Saitama runs the marvel hardcore gauntlet

This is still going on?

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Why act all surprised?

That's been h1's whole m.o. since 2005.

He does the exact same thing in other threads and Movie Versus. It's not a secret, it's "basic knowledge", as our rules would say.

Originally posted by Astner
This is still going on?

Originally posted by Smurph
Seriously though, Carver, you emphasized that it would take a comic book high herald or trans tier to blitz so fast that the victim experiences the blitz after the blitzer has already blitzed.

That was your criteria:

You asked for my thoughts. My thoughts are "here's a picture of Wolverine doing that too"

You might say "but Wolverine is still in motion! Platinum Sperm was even faster"

To which I would say:
a) talking is a free action
b) Wolverine is a low meta
c) ergo, art is ambiguous

I accept that Platinum Sperm is faster than Wolverine by a massive margin. I am just pointing out that your proof of that fact is, in fact, not proof.

The speed fts are not comparable but I get what you're saying.

Originally posted by Smurph
This isn't surprise, I just wanted to see if h1 would cop to being a troll.

A troll ignores evidence. I don't.
If I stated something incorrect then you should prove me wrong. This is a debate forum. We are suppose to debate. Just stop with the flame derailing posts ok.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Awesome. It's a good thing I'd have even more than the starting distance, then, from horizon to horizon, just to be safe. So if I wanted to, as I'd be Sentry, I could hit at [FT]L, right?

You didn't understand that i answered the question in the previous reply?

Originally posted by h1a8
You didn't understand that i answered the question in the previous reply?

Ok, so if I can achieve it in a fight as Sentry, then the only thing that's stopping Sentry from achieving a [FT]L bullrush is him not wanting to bullrush at FTL.

Hm.

Why do you think that is?

Originally posted by h1a8
A troll ignores evidence. I don't.
If I stated something incorrect then you should prove me wrong. This is a debate forum. We are suppose to debate. Just stop with the flame derailing posts ok.

And it's not flame posting. You've repeatedly said that you know DS Sentry's capabilities and you know how he fights. It's therefore relevant that you have literally never read any of his (very few) appearances.

You point to your basis of knowledge; I'm just inquiring about that basis.

Originally posted by Philosophía
It was pretty hard to tie you to a metaphorical table and extract that yes so, suffice to say, it came as a surprise when it finally came out.

Ok, so if I can achieve it in a fight as Sentry, then the only thing that's stopping Sentry from achieving a [FT]L bullrush is him not wanting to bullrush at FTL.

Hm.

Why do you think that is?

Because of character. Who thinks to circle around building speed to ftl before bullrushing? Not me. Just you probably. I didn't think of that until you mentioned it. Sentry would think (like all of Saitama's earlier enemies) that Saitama is someone he can pinky flick kill.

Characters must only not have the creativity to think of wild tactics, but have the propensity to do them, and it be feasible to do/work.

Besides, Saitama doesn't have to stand there still. He can become 100x images or just stay moving beyond Sentry's perception.
Lastly, Saitama was hit to the moon with a scratch. I don't if a bullrush is going to do anything to him, lightspeed or not.

Originally posted by Smurph
Fair, you don't just ignore evidence. You ignore the comic book entirely.

And it's not flame posting. You've repeatedly said that you know DS Sentry's capabilities and you know how he fights. It's therefore relevant that you have literally never read any of his (very few) appearances.

You point to your basis of knowledge; I'm just inquiring about that basis.

If I say that DS Sentry doesn't fight a certain way. Then it is either true or false. If true then everything you are saying is irrelevant. If false, then anyone can clearly post proof proving otherwise.

Anything other than that is flaming and derailing the thread. We are here to debate, nothing more.

Saitama was hit from earth to Jupiter moon with enough force to shed stars from a distance and he got up as if nothing happened. Sentry isn't even tickling him with a hit.

Originally posted by h1a8
Because of character. Who thinks to circle around building speed to ftl before bullrushing? Not me. Just you probably. I didn't think of that until you mentioned it.

See, this is what I like, talking to people that think differently.

So if you'd use your flight slam into your opponent for maximum damage, and you'd know that in a straight line you wouldn't be able to make as much damage as you want, you wouldn't even think to build up speed, and just go straight into him anyway?

That's persistence. I like it.

Btw, I already mentioned this is not in relation to Saitama, it's just a hypothetical exercise.

Originally posted by h1a8
Because of character. Who thinks to circle around building speed to ftl before bullrushing? Not me. Just you probably. I didn't think of that until you mentioned it. Sentry would think (like all of Saitama's earlier enemies) that Saitama is someone he can pinky flick kill.

Characters must only not have the creativity to think of wild tactics, but have the propensity to do them, and it be feasible to do/work.

Besides, Saitama doesn't have to stand there still. He can become 100x images or just stay moving beyond Sentry's perception.
Lastly, Saitama was hit to the moon with a scratch. I don't if a bullrush is going to do anything to him, lightspeed or not.

What's the difference from Surfer flying at 100 times the speed of light and reacting to things vs Sentry flying FTL?

Originally posted by h1a8
Because of character. Who thinks to circle around building speed to ftl before bullrushing? Not me. Just you probably. I didn't think of that until you mentioned it. Sentry would think (like all of Saitama's earlier enemies) that Saitama is someone he can pinky flick kill.

Characters must only not have the creativity to think of wild tactics, but have the propensity to do them, and it be feasible to do/work.

Besides, Saitama doesn't have to stand there still. He can become 100x images or just stay moving beyond Sentry's perception.
Lastly, Saitama was hit to the moon with a scratch. I don't if a bullrush is going to do anything to him, lightspeed or not.

Sentry wouldn't be in character though since CIS is off. So, he would be using his full capabilities for combat no idiot ball.

Originally posted by h1a8
If I say that DS Sentry doesn't fight a certain way. Then it is either true or false. If true then everything you are saying is irrelevant. If false, then anyone can clearly post proof proving otherwise.

Anything other than that is flaming and derailing the thread. We are here to debate, nothing more.

As you've admitted, you won't do that because you would rather spend pages talking out of your ass until somebody walks you through the comic that you won't read.

Pointing out trolling doesn't derail anything but the trolling.

Originally posted by Old Man Whirly!
an infinite mass bullrush will have no effect you say mmm

Originally posted by Smurph
Well, no. If you're making an assertion, the burden of proof is on you. It's up to you to read the comics, assess DS Sentry's character and make your case.

As you've admitted, you won't do that because you would rather spend pages talking out of your ass until somebody walks you through the comic that you won't read.

Pointing out trolling doesn't derail anything but the trolling.

so post a quantifiable speed feat for saitama then. no head canon or fanmade calcs. something directly stated on the page.

i will be waiting. 🙂

Fts been posted that no one here can perform

Originally posted by carver9
Fts been posted that no one here can perform

post them again

if you wanna make stupid statements like "no one here can perform"

you better back it up with some fooking evidence

this isn't middle school anymore