Order based on who would win a fight

Originally posted by h1a8
The first scan is inconclusive (what's the issue number).
The following scans are Thanos teleporting, not opening portals where someone (not him) is able to run through.

The argument is that Thanos (using only his own power or current standard equipment) can open portals exactly like how he did against Gladiator.

Saint originally claimed that Thanos can bfr Mangog exactly like he did Gladiator. Thanos was in his chair when he did that. I asked Saint to prove that Thanos can do that WITHOUT his chair (or that Thanos did it without using the chair).

This next evidence should end this argument…

Let’s be clear where his setting is a recliner not his OG chair.

Originally posted by Ambient
First scan is the Infinity Abyss series his been shown to port people in and out for they’re mission

This next evidence should end this argument…

Let’s be clear where his setting is a recliner not his OG chair.

Phuck you Ambient, I had a beautiful series of posts where I overran my image limits because I posted so many scans lmao.

Hahaha.

Well it's on the previous page. Nearly 20 scans from the last few years, if people ever want to use it as a reference.

Obliged, goes against my style though.

That style being: How would I debate in a bar, while drunk, befoe phones were a thing.

.

Originally posted by Ambient
First scan is the Infinity Abyss series his been shown to port people in and out for they’re mission

This next evidence should end this argument…

Let’s be clear where his setting is a recliner not his OG chair.

Why is this thread 6 pages long? I wasn't asking for proof to argue. I was asking for proof so that I can accept the truth.
All you or Saint had to do was provide proof. You encourage his trolling.

So Thanos can bfr Mangog if he wanted to and therefore is greater than him.

So thread
Tyrant, Thanos, Mangog, Kurse
End of the thread

👆

lollll

Originally posted by h1a8
In other words, he can't do anything to Mangog, if Bfr is off.
Thank you for that.

Now on to my true intent.
Bfr is not option for Thanos here.
Why?
Because the Bfr feat against Gladiator doesn't count in a forum fight.
Think about why before you respond.

Originally posted by h1a8
I can do such things because I know the truth (that's the only way someone is justified for doing such things).

...

Originally posted by h1a8
Why is this thread 6 pages long? I wasn't asking for proof to argue. I was asking for proof so that I can accept the truth.

[...]

So Thanos can bfr Mangog if he wanted to

Originally posted by Smurph
lollll

...

So you know, it took 6 pages to post proof. Good you know that.

Because I was having fun with a guy who was arrogant when he really had no reason to be. You were arguing from a position of ignorance, and tried to pass it off as if you knew what you were talking about. So I thought I'd see how far you'd go. How you'd shift your goalposts etc.

I found it interesting that the very scan you used, had the chair destroyed in the very next panel, and the very storyline you used, had Thanos opening portals without his chair lol. Index fingers indeed. Writer intents etc.

If you would have said Thanos can bfr Mangog (gave no details) then I would have been slightly skeptical but more trusting. But when you said, "like he did Gladiator", I thought immediately that Thanos used the chair and he doesn't have the chair in a forum. So I had a problem with that.

Here's my take, you didn't know of the other instances either outside of the Gladiator showing. That's why you were trying to argue with me that the chair is standard equipment lmao and was reluctant on showing proof when asked. You did research and found other showings LATER. That's when you wanted to make a bet. But you pretended to know (or recall) of all of them up front when you didn't. Which made me even more confident that such showings don't exist (you kept arguing wrong things like chair is standard equipment).

Originally posted by h1a8
If you would have said Thanos can bfr Mangog (gave no details) then I would have been slightly skeptical but more trusting. But when you said, "like he did Gladiator", I thought immediately that Thanos used the chair and he doesn't have the chair in a forum. So I had a problem with that.

Here's my take, you didn't know of the other instances either outside of the Gladiator showing. That's why you were trying to argue with me that the chair is standard equipment lmao and was reluctant on showing proof when asked. You did research and found other showings LATER. That's when you wanted to make a bet. But you pretended to know (or recall) of all of them up front when you didn't. Which made me even more confident that such showings don't exist (you kept arguing wrong things like chair is standard equipment).

I didn't know of the other scans (or, having read the comics, it just really didn't register).

But I remembered that BRB destroyed the chair (it's literally the next page). . And I half remembered the portal away (it's the end of the story).

So I was fairly confident the chair wasn't needed. Then I just went through a couple of Thanos stories and found tons of examples.

However, you simply didn't tolerate the possibility you were wrong. And kept doubling down.

Moreover, when faced with possibilities that you WERE wrong, you just started bringing in unrelated items - the chair being destroyed being a plot point (lol), the left index finger being some kind of proof (double lol)....by this time, I had already collated a fair few of the scans, so decided to string you along because I wanted to see what kind of poster you were.

You:

1. Attempted to pass ignorance off as fact
2. Attempted to throw red herrings (the 'plot point'😉
3. Attempted to use your interpretation of 'writers intent' (lol) as proof (by this time I had long-refreshed my memory of Thanos opening the portal after said chair was destroyed, so I knew I had plenty of proof)
4. Dressed all these attempts up in arrogance where you made it appear as though I was lying.

Look, you say 'like with Gladiator ' was what set you off - but in the VERY NEXT PAGE, the chair was destroyed. Anyone who has read the comic would have seen this, especially if they were asserting truths of any kind based on these showings. So you had merely seen one or two panels, and thought you were unassailable.

Anyway, shall we move on to the other points of argument? You did say we could argue other points. I am not done yet, and will have my pound of metaphorical flesh lmao.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Here's what happened.

I didn't know of the other scans (or, having read the comics, it just really didn't register).

But I remembered that BRB destroyed the chair (it's literally the next page). . And I half remembered the portal away (it's the end of the story).

So I was fairly confident the chair wasn't needed. Then I just went through a couple of Thanos stories and found tons of examples.

However, you simply didn't tolerate the possibility you were wrong. And kept doubling down.

Moreover, when faced with possibilities that you WERE wrong, you just started bringing in unrelated items - the chair being destroyed being a plot point (lol), the left index finger being some kind of proof (double lol)....by this time, I had already collated a fair few of the scans, so decided to string you along because I wanted to see what kind of poster you were.

You:

1. Attempted to pass ignorance off as fact
2. Attempted to throw red herrings (the 'plot point'😉
3. Attempted to use your interpretation of 'writers intent' (lol) as proof (by this time I had long-refreshed my memory of Thanos opening the portal after said chair was destroyed, so I knew I had plenty of proof)
4. Dressed all these attempts up in arrogance where you made it appear as though I was lying.

Look, you say 'like with Gladiator ' was what set you off - but in the VERY NEXT PAGE, the chair was destroyed. Anyone who has read the comic would have seen this, especially if they were asserting truths of any kind based on these showings. So you had merely seen one or two panels, and thought you were unassailable.

Anyway, shall we move on to the other points of argument? You did say we could argue other points. I am not done yet, and will have my pound of metaphorical flesh lmao.

Lol

Your dragging of h1 aside. I actually like Mango's chances of beating Thanos in h2h.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Here's what happened.

I didn't know of the other scans (or, having read the comics, it just really didn't register).

But I remembered that BRB destroyed the chair (it's literally the next page). . And I half remembered the portal away (it's the end of the story).

So I was fairly confident the chair wasn't needed. Then I just went through a couple of Thanos stories and found tons of examples.

However, you simply didn't tolerate the possibility you were wrong. And kept doubling down.

Moreover, when faced with possibilities that you WERE wrong, you just started bringing in unrelated items - the chair being destroyed being a plot point (lol), the left index finger being some kind of proof (double lol)....by this time, I had already collated a fair few of the scans, so decided to string you along because I wanted to see what kind of poster you were.

You:

1. Attempted to pass ignorance off as fact
2. Attempted to throw red herrings (the 'plot point'😉
3. Attempted to use your interpretation of 'writers intent' (lol) as proof (by this time I had long-refreshed my memory of Thanos opening the portal after said chair was destroyed, so I knew I had plenty of proof)
4. Dressed all these attempts up in arrogance where you made it appear as though I was lying.

Look, you say 'like with Gladiator ' was what set you off - but in the VERY NEXT PAGE, the chair was destroyed. Anyone who has read the comic would have seen this, especially if they were asserting truths of any kind based on these showings. So you had merely seen one or two panels, and thought you were unassailable.

Anyway, shall we move on to the other points of argument? You did say we could argue other points. I am not done yet, and will have my pound of metaphorical flesh lmao.

I knew the chair was destroyed right off the bat (it was destroyed very recently years after the Gladiator scene). That was my primary weapon (not only weapon) for arguing that it's not standard equipment.

So I didn't know (rather remember) of any instances of Thanos Bfr people outside the Gladiator showing. So when you tried arguing that the chair is standard then that made me think that scene was the only one. Otherwise, why argue the chair is standard when he's done it without the chair? Therefore, that must be the only time in both our minds.

There was no arrogance at all. You fed me that way. Stating that Thanos has Bfr someone without using the chair would have been better. But you didn't know (or remember) at the time. If that's the case then you shouldn't have argued anymore until you found proof. Arguing the chair is standard is stubborn and bias by you. If not arrogance.

Just so you know, when ever I ask for proof then I'm already willing to accept what truth comes out of it. I don't have any skin in the game.

Your mistake was trying to argue the chair was standard equipment.

You having ignorance doesn't mean truth.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
You having ignorance doesn't mean truth.

Does that have anything with arguing the chair was standard?

It does. In fact, it is symptomatic of your entire persona as a poster.

This all started with you putting words in my mouth, based on 'truth' based on ignorance.

So let's go on the next few points, shall we? Or do you wish to keep on this point, that Thanos can't open portals and has NEVER shown this ability (as you confidently asserted)?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
It does. In fact, it is symptomatic of your entire persona as a poster.

This all started with you putting words in my mouth, based on 'truth' based on ignorance.

So let's go on the next few points, shall we? Or do you wish to keep on this point, that Thanos can't open portals and has NEVER shown this ability (as you confidently asserted)?

You were the one who tried to argue the chair is standard equipment.
Would that be out of ignorance?

I'm not afraid to say my assumption was wrong. It was. But it was motivated by you trying to argue the chair is standard.

Originally posted by h1a8
You were the one who tried to argue the chair is standard equipment.
Would that be out of ignorance?

I'm not afraid to say my assumption was wrong. It was. But it was motivated by you trying to argue the chair is standard.

You first said that your truth - how this all started - was based on a post I made which made ZERO mention of the chair being standard. Moreover I like how your truth is now an assumption. Good. You are learning.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Oh, don't put words in my mouth. How does 'there are other options' = 'nothing he can do ', in other words? The two statements are completely different.

YOU started with this assumption that I assumed standard chairs. Nice deflection, though, I can see. Second or third time now you have ignored my question. Shall we move on to the next erroneous points you made?