Originally posted by Guestdude
No. A nuke is hot in general for several second/But it is not 100 million degrees celcius for longer than a millionth of a second. It immediately cools down after it reaches this temp
“The hottest part of any explosion occurs in the initial stages”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/03/28/ask-ethan-how-can-a-nuclear-bomb-be-hotter-than-the-center-of-our-sun/?sh=40174c56460bIn fiction, lifting strength is never the same as striking, Batman can’t lift a car, but he could punch someone though a brick wall.
So, we need to compare Superman’s attack power to thors, not his lifting strength
Best quantifiable attack for Thor is probably, the jotunheim bolt, when he sent a shockwave la hundred times larger than the Grand Canyon.
A lower end feat would probably be his shockwave he created when attacking malekith or Thor.
Nowhere does that article state what you are saying.
1st, the article is talking about atomic bombs, not hydrogen bombs.
2nd, plenty of sources will tell you that 99% of the entire thermal energy of a hydrogen bomb is during the 2nd pulse which lasts for MANY SECONDS. If you can't find a source then I'll provide you with one
I didn't say lifting strength = striking strength. Pay attention
I said striking strength > lifting strength
In particular,
Striking strength = lifting strength + other factors.
Lifting strength gives the lowest amount ones striking strength can be. Not the highest.
The jotunheim feat isn't a striking feat. That's an energy projection feat. It's not practical in combat. Thor can't apply that move unless someone sits or lays there and allows Thor to do that.
Lastly, the feat isn't what you think it is. The land mass was mostly frozen and hollow underneath. Thor melted a critical area and created a domino effect. A good punch could have achieved the same result. We even see how the land mass is held up by random beams (can't think of the word) UNDERNEATH.