Originally posted by h1a8sorry, but i couldn't disagree more.
If multiple simple ways exist to defeat an opponent, you can't just pick the one you prefer if it contradicts the movies.Sentinels have been shown to efficiently kill humans with their tentacles, as seen during the invasion of Zion. While a bomb or laser could also be effective, it might not be the smartest option since they both use more energy and the bomb endangers them. Your argument assumes they would always fly away from Otto at the start of the fight (to be safe from the bomb effects) and then throw bombs, which is an unreasonable expectation for how they engage humanoid combatants.
The evidence suggests they are actually that limited in intelligence, as they never once used lasers or bombs against individual targets, even when hundreds were being destroyed by machine guns. They aren't independent thinkers - they are machines following a programmed directive. It makes sense that they use bombs to destroy ships from a distance while relying on their tentacles to eliminate humanoid targets up close. This is also efficient from an energy usage viewpoint.
My stance is that if a character performs an action at least once, but has many contradictory low showings, I prioritize that one instance over the weaker ones. For example, if a Sentinel had been shown using a bomb or laser from a distance on a humanoid even once - despite 100 instances where they didn't, even while being massacred for hours - I would favor that single showing. However, we don't even have that one instance here. Their programming dictates their behavior, and they have only ever used bombs against ships from a distance and lasers to cut through hulls. Again, they are not individuals making tactical choices - they follow a set program.
the very fact that sentinels DO have tow bombs as standard equipment, but didn't use them at all during the battle of zion tells you just how much they, like so many other characters in cinema, were gimped for the sake of the plot....but thankfully that's not something we have to factor in with versus battles. plot based dipshittery doesn't apply here. 🙂
like i said earlier- if plot stupidity wouldn't have been a factor, the machines could have just sent one or two machine ambassadors into zion, and just had them nuke the entire damn thing in one fell swoop (like they did to the UN in animatrix). but of course that can't actually happen IN the movie, because neo would have never transitioned into digital jesus and saved humanity if it did.
but at the end of the day, sentinels have tow bombs (which they have deployed multiple times on screen). they have basic knowledge about ock and his abilities. they have a directive to kill him. assuming they wouldn't deploy a tow bomb for a fast and efficient victory is nonsense tbh. even if you want to argue that tow bombs "only" lock onto metallic targets or whateverthef*ck, that still obviously wouldn't be a problem because-
https://postimg.cc/R61FXCgj
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zerono offense, but you didn't really mention anything new tbh.
Anyways, I did what I came in this thread to do, and explained about the TOW bombs, that was my primary reason for coming into this thread 😛