Originally posted by Lestov16
👆1. This isn't comics. This is the second time you've been told that.
2. Practically every character you mentioned is either a matter manipulator or cosmic entity.
3. As I stated, even if that rule were true, Apoc has been shown manipulating structures way more durable than Thanos aka an entire Egyptian city, so even by your rules, Thanos is still going to have trouble here
4. Again, you act like Apoc encases people inside of their surroundings rather than literally convert their matter into the elements of their surroundings. Apoc doesn't just trap people in walls. He literally transforms their matter into the wall itself. Thanos has no onscreen defense against this, and you know it
1. If the rule of logic holds true - that a matter manipulator can manipulate anything and anyone without specific resistance feats - then it applies across all mediums. Comics are just one example. Arguing that this isn't comics is irrelevant; we're discussing logic and reasoning, which are universal.
2. It doesn't matter because you don't get to make less logical than mine exceptions to your rules about resistance to matter manipulation. More durable beings are inherently more resistant than less durable ones unless stated or shown otherwise. That's the standard. Assuming that a being who can manipulate paper can also manipulate a nearly indestructible material is absurd.
3. Thanos is vastly more durable than the pyramids, many times over. The pyramids are just sand and stone - it's not even close. A fighter jet could demolish a pyramid with ease, but it wouldn't leave a scratch on Thanos.
4. The movie contradicts your argument at the end. Re-watch the scene where Apocalypse dies. Regardless, Apocalypse wouldn't be able to manipulate Thanos in the first place.