Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Carver now, having been happy and having agreed to the ruling Galan typed out, wants the entire concept of 'WWH' struck out.Even though we can always just say it's Green Scar, which avoids all of that. Green Scar is the Hulk we saw on Sakaar, on Earth punching everyone out, and in the Dark Dimension with Umar. In Vegas, in New York.
Or not. At this point I think Carver's always angry.
All you did was bait in this thread to keep the argument going. Your baiting kept this topic up. After all of the ridiculous baiting you did, I then saw the flaws. All you had to do was let the topic go, but its always Dark being Dark.
https://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=684281&pagenumber=5
So yeah.
Originally posted by carver9
All you did was bait in this thread to keep the argument going. Your baiting kept this topic up. After all of the ridiculous baiting you did, I then saw the flaws. All you had to do was let the topic go, but its always Dark being Dark.https://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=684281&pagenumber=5
So yeah.
Jesus.
So now you're angry at me for........ changing your mind?
For pointing things out to you?
Originally posted by Smurph
inoffensive* lolSo basically, when arguing about WWH/WBH, refer to Green Scar to be safe
And when arguing about Superman, ignore PC unless included in OP
👆
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998No. It's a comic book feat in the comic discussion thread. We never have to specify which version of the character is on the page.
TBH, I actually more interesting about, if say, I posted a feat from Pre-Crisis, but it's in Comic Book Questions & Discussion thread, do I need to specify such things?
Since recently I'm basically just active in this specific thread. And this thread technically isn't a Vs thread
You just can't rely on it in a vs thread unless the OP includes it. Which is mostly how people deal with PC stuff anyways.
Originally posted by Smurph
No. It's a comic book feat in the comic discussion thread. We never have to specify which version of the character is on the page.You just can't rely on it in a vs thread unless the OP includes it. Which is mostly how people deal with PC stuff anyways.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Yeah it's still up for discussion. Thor fighting Godzilla is allowed, we discuss anything and everything comic related there.Including Punisher's Skull Thong.
So I really don't have much time and energy participate in many Vs threads. Currently I'm reading all Hal's stories(which some posts in the dicussion thread can tell). Hopefully I can one day manage to finish it(but it truly is some daunting projects, which may take a long years to even finish one lol)
Edit:
Also, are these respect threads allowed? I assumed it's allowed
Originally posted by ODGHey, I'd be all for the WWH character name either going away completely or just being used synonymously with Green Scar too, but the rule is still easy to follow.
Yes, carver9 should determine KMC forum rules. 👆 All given a chance? Funny. Given that I initially posted my thoughts on 7/6/25 and on the night of 7/9/25 when I started posting again, the adjusted mod ruling was already in place? Maybe back off from your appeal to authority fallacy, pal.Anyway, I ain't arguing against the adjusted mod ruling.
Because I understood the original mod ruling.
All I did was argue against the notion that the original/adjusted mod ruling was meant to fairly balance Marvel vs. DC. It wasn't. It's a lopsided, nonsensical ruling that has little to do with comic narrative.
But as Philosophía, Galan007 and I have all pointed out repeatedly, so long as you refer to 'Green Scar' there is no controversy.
Sure, that begs the question why the mod ruling was instituted/revisited in the first place, but unless the mods want to invite such discussion, who cares?
Fwiw, I don't care *how* we define "WWH"(the character) either. Could be ruled as a different version(with a cap on his powers), like we have now... Or we could [re]amend the ruling, and simply make the term "WWH" interchangeable with "Green Scar". The semantics of it do not matter to me in the slightest. /shrug
Either way, a clear and concise forum vocabulary obviously needs to be in place, and using the more appropriate "Green Scar" tag still gets the Hulk fans almost everything they want in a versus thread anyway(short of having WBH-mode instantly active.) What I'm saying is: I still don't understand the problem here, but if others foresee some sort of huge/crippling issue, I'm always open to opinions I guess?
Originally posted by Galan007*Though I would add that we need to ensure the later iteration of WWH shown was in fact WWH -- not an alternate, not an illusion, not the product of mind phuckery, etc. It needs to provably be *THE* [616] WWH we're talking about(I haven't read the pertinent issues, so I'm not sure what the context is either way.) IOW, we can't have any legitimate reason to question the statements made. [/QUOTE]
*sigh*
g007-psyduck
|
|
|
V
Actually
.....
I think this was Samuel Sterns pretending to be Green Scar in Hulk's mindscape. NOT Hulk.
So Carver's scans were from Immortal Hulk #32.
In later issues, it's shown that it was actually Sam Sterns fooling the idiotic Savage Hulk, who was too simple-minded to see that it was him pretending to be Green Scar:
The Leader even trapped devil Hulk:
Sam telling the personalities (and us) his plan:
Him actually shifting into Green Scar mode to fool the simple-minded:
In short, this post:
Originally posted by carver9
Said on panel that he's the strongest (there's another time it was said as well... that he is the strongest amongst the Hulks)...
Was completely wrong. Sam Sterns was saying he was the strongest, lmao, even as he was fooling the simple-minded and slow.