Originally posted by Mr Master[ and your interprtations of them making them your opinions.
Not my opinion, it's just the facts.
Originally posted by Mr MasterAlready stated my thoughts on what constitutes one.
hey if you can post a scan of a Multiversal feat,
or tell me in what issue I can find one,
I'll gladly agree.
Originally posted by Mr MasterYou can say it wasn't, but that's quibbling. Its still a universe, like it or not.
But if you're using Phoenix holding a Timeline (which isn't a whole Universe)
Originally posted by Mr Masteryes because being greater than a universe means that you are less than a universe... oh wait...
as a Multiversal feat,then I have to disagree.
Originally posted by Mr MasterSure because logic and reasoning are such nusances...
And I'm by no means trying to change your mind. But only On Panel proof,
and even better if it's accompanied by a corresponding official Handbook bio,
will change mine.
Originally posted by Mr MasterWhich totally over rides onpanel evidence cause handbooks are always right even when they're wrong most of the time...
A Timeline, certified on panel, as we know they are 150 Years in the Future (a 616 Timeline)
and certified in Two Official Handbooks as being such.[b/]
Originally posted by Mr MasterTiny universes are still universes. Just as a baby elephant is still an elephant or a baby human is still a human.
[B]I agree, all Timelines are Tiny (Baby) Universes connected to a Parent (Whole) Universe.
Originally posted by Mr MasterYeah, and its still the same thing that its parents were. It might not be as big but that doesn't change what it is.
This is why the Phoenix Consciousness said: when Unity broke out across the Megasystems"[/b]
Originally posted by Mr MasterI'd hope not. Because if you were doing it intentionally you'd be trolling.
I don't think I'm demeaning the feat friend.
Originally posted by Mr MasterOr your interpritation of it. You also seem to downplay Phoenixes importance whn it comes to the creation of the alternate timeline and the preservation of the 616 timeline. Ignoring the fact that if it weren't for phoenix at that point in time then 616 would have become the "here comes tomorrow" timeline. And it was her forcing scott to stay with emma that severed the timeline from 616.
I'm just clearing up what happened in truth in Here Comes Tomorrow.
Originally posted by Mr MasterUh huh... that makes it sound like you brought up the What if just so you wouldn't be preceived as doing that. But we both know that's not the case. As while I may not agree with your interpritations you do not intentionally misinterprate or interprate differently the feats you talk about.
If I were demeaning the Phoenix's feats,
I would demean her truly full blown Universal feat when she destroyed
that Alternate Universe in a What If.Which I conceded did happen, because it did, on panel and in the bio.
Originally posted by Mr MasterCertianly sounds like you're trying to downplay the fact that it was a universe.
I'm not claiming that it wasn't a Universe, I'm simply stating that it wasn't a Whole Universe,
which is a fact according to Marvel,
because again, it was a [B]Timeline belonging to 616, 150 years in the Future.[/b]
Originally posted by Mr MasterAnd it was still a universe. add the modifiers on that you want, it doesn't change what it was.
I agree, just not a whole Universe.Whole Universe > Universal Timeline
Originally posted by Mr MasterLike with phoenix dealing with D'ken and the M'kron crystal?
I agree ... Universal Timeline (Tiny Reality) > GalaxyI agree, the Phoenix is definitely more powerful than one of Eternity's countless Aspects.
I have to disagree, because it wasn't just a threat.
In this story, the entire World was afflicted by Sublime,
surely another Hero (if one existed) would have been involved.As all entire Earth span stories involve multiple characters from separate books.
Or how about when the avengers fought ultrion and only the avengers showed up?
Or when the Zodiac attacked and only the new warriors showed up?
Or the times when only a certain team dealt with a certain group/villian in their own little book?
Or its also quite a bit like superman having numerous powers to deal with a given threat but either "forgets" or just doesn't use everything that's available?
Originally posted by Mr MasterWhy? Because I felt that she dealt with the univere she was holding with such ease that she wasn't having to concentrate to deal with it that she might be able to deal with more than one at a time even if the same size level?
Well then cool.But you know, you're re-defining the term Multiversal,
like you told me Marvel was doing with the term Omniverse.
Its really not an unreasonable stretch to think that a person who can hold a universe almost absent mindendly (not paying attention to it the entire time, even looking away for a moment with no visual or mentioned strain) she couldn't possibly deal with more than one?
Originally posted by Mr MasterStill a universe.
but we'll leave it at that.A baby, as stated on panel above.
Originally posted by Mr MasterIf I were to hold a sugar glider in my hands, and it was no effort, are you to say that because I had never held two sugar gliders that I couldn't? Even given how easy it was for me to hold the one? I've held a sugar glider in my hands, it was easy. I think I could hold two based on how easy it was.
"[B]It lost it's Parents when Unity broke out across the Megasystems"[/b]
Originally posted by Mr MasterAnd I'm sure at the times that his statements weren't supposed to be hyperbolic... or else you figure that they were intentionally trying to show he doesn't alway know what he's talking about.?
Only it wasn't just a hyperbolic quote.
Originally posted by Mr MasterDoesn't mean he's any less a putz.
He was depicted artistically On Panel performing the feat.