X3 news

Started by ayjay175 pages

he had a cameo in X-1 aswell....he was on the tv

Who has a cameo in X1...Beast?

well im not sure about beast in x1 but...

if they surf the net at all they'll know that beast and gambit are the two most wanted characters to be introduced, they'd be stupid not to include them...

plus colossus needs a bigger part...

I heard that singer was gonna put Gambit in X3 as the featured character like Kurt was in X2.....with a new director..that idea might not happen...but Collusus (I know spelled wrong) will get a bigger role...I missed it the first time I saw X2...I had something in my eye and it took me 6 seconds to get it out...if only it would have taken me 4.

I'm sure that the producers might make Gambit the featured character in the film if they want to make it better than the first two...they are giving the fans what they want, and if Gambit will make the film bigger than expect him as the featured charcter. That's my two cents.

finally a voice of reason...give us what we want...

gambit should be in x3 yes, but giving him alot more screen time than the others is not really fair...

Originally posted by ayjay
he had a cameo in X-1 aswell....he was on the tv

Uuuummm....... 😕

You have your X-Men films confused, Beast had a cameo in X-Men 2 on a television screen inside the bar as Hank. He had NO cameo in the first X-Men film.

o0o crap..was that the second one..o0o yeeh...hhaha..ma bad

wow, I never noticed a Beast in X2.... Mainstream, I heard different, I thought Singer made it clear that he would not put Gambit in the movies because he looked too much like Cyclops, his personality too much like Wolverine's (god forbid anyone steal a little of the action from him!) and that he did not want to take the spot light off of the other characters (doesn't sound too fond of Gambit) the only reason Gambit has a chance of being in the next movie(s) is because there is a new director, a good thing after all in my opinion.

i want GAMBIT! >__<

Originally posted by gambitindaflesh
wow, I never noticed a Beast in X2.... Mainstream, I heard different, I thought Singer made it clear that he would not put Gambit in the movies because he looked too much like Cyclops, his personality too much like Wolverine's (god forbid anyone steal a little of the action from him!) and that he did not want to take the spot light off of the other characters (doesn't sound too fond of Gambit) the only reason Gambit has a chance of being in the next movie(s) is because there is a new director, a good thing after all in my opinion.

I read Singer interview in the lastest Wizard book...he was gonna make Gambit the featured Xman in X3..just like Nightcrawler was in X2. I think Gambit is like Wolverine because he's a loner..but he's more of a laddies man..would be pimp...Wolverine more of a dirty savage type.

Oh, shoot, and to think I didn't want Singer...

pimp??? NO, he's not like that, he just is horny. Mostly for Rogue!

okay...pimp may was the wrong word then...horny for Rogue card throwing superhero then!

Ooo, I like that!

LOL, that fits well with me too.

something tells me your a big Gambit fan mysteriox

I agreee wih you Kei. I think Storm Rogue and Gambit should be a main character in X3. My name is Storm so I am really a fan of Storm and I think she should be in X3. Also I dont think logan should be a main charactor again. He may be a popular charactor but 2 movies are enough.

yeah....the Xmen movies are really just Wolverine movies if you think about it.