Yes, but what are you implying Reed does if he does indeed have no resources. He is quite adept at tactics but so too are two of his opponents (Storm and Cyclops have lead for years as well), and any tactic he concocts in that brilliant mind is no secret to Emma Frost.
Emma is doing alot isn't she battling off Sue. While reading Reed's mind and messing with the other two. Not saying she isn't strong but this is over extending her if you ask me. Sue alone has proven a match for her and I think that without her the X-Men team can't beat the other three.
Morality is an attribute made up to stop them doing things in the comics. Not here.
Thanos has no qualms about killing. He doesn't go around killing off major characters. It's just reputation. Unless you count the infinity gauntlet etc. In which he's a rare exception and it was a one off. Nobody in comics actually kills regularly, moral or not. Because of sales and consistancy. You aren't making any sense.
Drop the morality curtain. It doesn't work.
In the comics, yes. Thanos is a "killer"....we're told. As I proved above, not alot of killing actually gets done. Because of sales. I can't believe I have to explain the same points more than once.
No. Listen to me please, please.
If Thanos fought Captain America. He could kill him by blinking. He wouldn't. Not because of morals, but because of the fact that Captain America isn't going to be killed off is he? The EXCUSE may be "Mercy" or "morals". But that isn't why is it?
When was the last time Hulk went on a killing spree and killed loads of known names?
Often? Or never?
The fact is, moral character or not, killing NEVER gets done ALOT in comics to the major names because they are major names. They COULD do it with their powers, they don't because of business. Here, business isn't relevant.
In deciding the outcome of this fight, do the rules state that it is not allowed that a poster envision Reed coming up with a strategy based upon what is available, who is available, and the opponents in the particular battle, in order to win?
It's not about these specific characters, it's about you making stupid claims like "being under the same confines as everyone else" when these unique characters in Marvel are all different.
I'm asking that the man not be limited to stretching: if anyone agrees with that statement, they are arguing at cross purposes with me because I'm not saying anything else.
He won't Wolverine will make sure of that.
You take out Emma or any other telepath in her place though and the other three aren't up to the job.
Sorry Johnny takes out Storm Reed or Thing take out Wolverine. You see what I'm saying if Emma can't help because Sue is attacking her the X-Men have no chance.
Did you skip where I said it's not about these specific characters?
Every person in Marvel is unique, why are you going to lengths to put them all in the same confines? Stupid isn't it?
Don't put Torch against Wolverine if you know he can crisp him. But don't create the thread and take away Torch's power just for the purpose of having a thread.
Gender: Male Location: Kicking pigs out of the screen.
So now we are going from using comics to hypothetical logic, good.
Then this is PIS, I explained this explicitly.
Why doesn't flash ko all of his opponents in a picosecond?
Sales thats why, does that apply here, no.
Thanos WILL kill captain america by blinking, in this forum, he's not bound by CIS like SS may be.
Go make a thread, and everyone will say, "thanos will kill cap by blinking". Thats acceptable.
If I go make a thread and say "spiderman will knock off punisher's head, that isn't.
Thats the difference, you are disagreeing with a person who agrees.
Thanos will do it in this forum though, he has no quams about killing, thats pis.
Spiderman can kill, but he won't, thats him.
No thats sales, dude I agree with you, I just had this argument about hulk, and I sympathise with you.
Often? Or never?
The fact is, moral character or not, killing NEVER gets done ALOT in comics to the major names because they are major names. They COULD do it with their powers, they don't because of business. Here, business isn't relevant.
-AC [/B][/QUOTE]
I sympathise with you again, amazing, in fact I just said it in another post.
You can use the rules to make a thread where all of this can happen, just debate there.
The rules suck, but they're there to keep it fair.
Hasn't already been proven that Sue has already beat Emma once thats all you need then. If Emma gets taken out the X-Men loose. If Emma can stay in the fight and away from going toe to toe with Sue then their chances increase to a toss up I feel.
Why won't he? The only reason he doesn't kill in the comics is because of sales. He has the power to kill. So if it's a fight between him and Punisher, to the death, for the win. Why are we taking away Spidey's options?
Admitting they suck but claiming they keep it fair?
KMC Community Forums
Aug 28th, 2005 06:08 AM
