Ok Twisted Sister " In my opinion " (better say that or you will probably have a bad case of PMS) suck. Slayer shit on Twisted Sister, their pathetic in my opinion and dont even deserve to be on that list. Slayer is much more talented than Twisted Sister ever was
Dave lombardo is more talented than TS's drummer, king and hanneman are better rythem players and jeff is more of a talented lead player. That's all as far as talent go.
You didn't destroy anyone. You GOT destroyed. The fact that you like Twisted Sister is shit but that's not why you aren't credible really, so I'm not included there.
Your whole arguement was based around "Opinion aint wrong". To which you got proven blindingly wrong. Done.
[QUOTE=4826809]Originally posted by Alpha Centauri You didn't destroy anyone. You GOT destroyed.Hmmm, weren't you the one that said "Twisted Sister? I don't think anything need be said.
Kerry King is one of the best leads of all time, so way to invalidated yourself by calling him the worst ever." ?
Are you illiterate? My whole argument was based on the idiotic logic of thinking liking one band discredits someone's opinion on music ANDbased on my greater knowledgeof what makes a guitar player better or worse than others due to the fact that I have played the instrument for nearly 20 years. Spanked!
Liking them doesn't make you not credible in THIS discussion, I meant overall. I don't think anything needs to be said either.
Yes? What? This was a discussion about guitarists, so calling him the or ONE OF the worst EVER was what invalidated you. The Twisted Sister comment just sort of (aka does) render you invalid for calling out anyone's music taste doesn't it?
One: I'm quite clearly not illiterate, coming from someone who's been making mistakes left, right and centre.
Two: You're making a continued assumption. 20 years or not, as I said. There are guitarists of 30, 40 years who believe that Hendrix isn't the best ever. He is, so this isn't a case where that provides you with some kind of impenetrable shield.
Three: Your whole arguement was based on what opinion is and what fact is. Being that you were hiding behind "My opinion cannot be wrong" the whole time, and THAT got proven wrong, so did you. Hence why you started cowering behind your one line posts.
dude!! its all screwed up.. u wanna know y??
-Iron maiden should be top 10 AND above Black Sabbath (remember Ozzfest incident??)
-Greenday should NOT be on the list thus replaced by Audioslave(greenday just sucks)
-Meatloaf deserves more respect(father of Rock n' Roll)
-Sex Pistols should NOT be on list(too punky n stupid/lame)
-Judas Priest should be No. 1 (their the Gods of Metal for Heavens sake!!)
tq...
First of all the list sucked. I think they mixed up hard rock with metal cause thats all it was.
Nirvana DID deserve its spot
The Pixies should've been in the top thirty
The Clash should've been in the top ten
And why the hell was Boston on the list?
It's an image worth pondering for a moment. Maybe, when you cut past the instrumental and songwriting virtuosity, the funny voices and characters, what is left is a man alone in his recording studio for days at a time.
2. Black Sabbath (More Awesomeness than you can Shake a Stick at)
Awesome, is all I can say... (Except Van Halen should have been 5, imo) But I have a complaint: a lot of those are metal bands (doesn't bother me, but it's still not a "true" top 100)
KMC Community Forums
Aug 24th, 2005 03:18 AM
