ben shapiro is a divisive shitstain who would improve society by drinking draino. a true lord of edgelords right up there with milo.
__________________
Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
I was just explaining to Surtur in the other thread how some people just hate Palestians, they don't want compromise or peace, they want them all eradicated. Period.
So you indeed feel that Ben Shapiro is pro genocide?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
More like he despises the one that hate Jews just for being Jews. That is what it sounds like to me. If he had the power I do not think he would be rounding the arabs up to wipe them out.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Surt, Shapiro is under the impression that all Arabs in palestine hate Jews:
Per Shapiro, the entire population shares the ideology of the terrorists who want to kill jews. Hence, Shapiro's comments don't just apply to the "arabs" who actually hurt people, but the entire population of Arabs in Palestine. Hence when he wants Jews to kill all who seek to kill them, thaose would include all Arabs in Palestine as, per Shapiro, all arabs in Palestine wants to kill jews.
It doesn't mean he wants every man woman and child who are arabs dead. He's just passionate about people who want to kill Jews just for being Jews.
Yes or no: if Shapiro had the power would he exterminate all arabs in Palestine?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Some voters who voted for Trump did not vote for Trump because they supported him. They just didn't like Hillary that severely.
Still, some who voted for Trump but did not like either. He was viewed as the lesser of two evils.
Still, some voted for Trump because they liked various things about him but shortly after he took office, their opinion soured.
And, lastly, we have the supporters who have and still support Trump: this group is the "supporters" group and it is for sure, a small group (from 44% high to 29%, now). It just so happens we have numbers to back this up with the break down on approval ratings.
This article certainly has a lot of fanfare so I figure I should do my best to debunk before the deification hits its peak. Before I begin, I want to preface a few things. Ben Shapiro is a fun political commentator, but he is not even in my top five in regards to right wing intellectuals. He is a very smart guy, but there are titans in the movement that dwarf him in knowledge. The article begins by complaining about his rhetoric and behavior regarding ANTIFA. Robinson claims this indicates that Shapiro is a provocateur like Yiannoupolous or D'souza. I think this is utterly absurd. Using callous verbiage occasionally to drill in your point does not accurately represent one's body of work. Shapiro can use strong language sometimes but he usually presents himself with class, that certainly outstrips Yiannopolous, Spencer, or Taylor. Occasional vulgarity does necessitate a lack of class especially considering the amount of money that was spent preventing ANTIFA's rampage his comments seem justifiable. After the attack on rhetoric, the article begins by attacking his statements regarding racism in America. There are four points of contention that Robinson had with Shapiro's comments on racism.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Point 1: Before I begin it is imperative to note that it is not just Asian immigrants which earn more then whites do.
(please log in to view the image)
And yes, I understand most of the ethnic groups inside of this picture are technically Asian, but most were not mentioned in the study which was cited. Before I begin deconstructing immigrant income, I want to clarify a few things. Regardless of their wealth in proportion to the rest of their countries citizens, it is worth noting that these income groups have lower net worths then white households. This is due to their comparative lack of wealth to the native population when immigrating.
So regardless of the wealth of Asian immigrants it is and was considerably less the average white's net worth. What the medium income among ethnicities indicates is that education is a far more valuable determiner of wealth then ethnicity. To illustrate this point I will show college completion rates among ethnic groups and then look back at the chart which I previously showed.
(please log in to view the image)
This is self-explanatory, lower education means lower income. A further illustration of this point would be the income of Nigerians in comparison to blacks and whites. The average median income for blacks in 2015 was about 36,544 dollars. The income for Nigerians, on the other hand, was $62,086. If we compare education rates between the two ethnicities, this discrepancy becomes clear. According to the Migration Policy Institute, "some 73 percent of fathers and 53 percent of mothers in Nigeria immigrant families have completed college. ".(Most of these families complete college in the US). By the same study, only 18% of fathers and 15% of mothers have received a completed college education. Source: https://www.jbhe.com/2012/05/compar...cks-in-the-u-s/
Point 2: I think it is important to note the overstep made in the article. Robinson claims, "of course people who have full-time jobs usually aren’t in poverty, the problem is that black people disproportionately can’t get jobs.)". That was not the conclusion of the cited article. The aforementioned article cites a study by four federal reserve economists. The study uses four variables to account for job discrepancy: education, age, marital status and the state a person lives in. While these certainly are valid and fair variables there are myriad factors which affect employment discrepancy specifically single motherhood and pre-market job skills. The study even realizes this flaw and notes it in there conclusion:
Perhaps the biggest flaw is the fact that it does not account for geography. To quote David Andolfatto, Vice President and Economist, and Andrew Spewak, Research Associate,
Andolfatto who conducted his own study on the subject gleaned this result,
Point being, the issue is not nearly as clear-cut as Robinson would portend. There are many factors at play here, and racism/discrimination has not been cited as the main one in any of the studies I have looked at. The reason I do not believe the primary factor is discrimination is that the African-American unemployment was comparable to white unemployment before the Civil Right Act. The difference was usually about 1% between the two races. Surely, discrimination would affect unemployment greater than that? Walter Williams has had some fantastic commentary on this subject,
He points to the minimum wage laws as to why fewer blacks are employed per capita today then there were before the Civil Rights Act.
The last reason he cites is the low education standard which plagues African-Americans today.
The poor education given to African-Americans in conjunction with steep minimum wage laws seems like a far better and more realistic conclusion than "discrimination." To learn more, I would read: Race & Economics: How Much Can Be Blamed on Discrimination?
Point 3: I would never be so foolish to assume that black discrimination in the 1900s does not contribute to low income and net worth. Despite that this point is extraordinarily weak. As I have already discussed, many factors contribute to unemployment. All Shapiro is saying, is that single-motherhood contributes to low unemployment and income. This is empirically true for both whites and black. The effect is irrelevant to his point. Moving on.
Point 4: Again Robinson cites an article which is not exactly congruent with his conclusion.
The study cited notes the possible lack of accuracy it possesses. This is another vast oversimplification. Regression analyses are always going to be fraught with lack of constancy and control. I am not going to give an economic lesson, but I would look into Austrian theory on this subject if you are interested. There is an excellent paper written by William Willbanks which discusses the "Myth of a Racist Justice System." He concludes that poverty is more of a factor than race that determines a black man’s chance of being arrested. Personally, I am no fan of the police state. I think the state over arrests all of its citizens. I believe it is overaggressive and tyrannous and encroaches most of our civil liberties. That being said, I doubt race is a determinant factor.
This concludes the first third of the article. I will be working on the other two next.
No, he despises them all. It's in his words, he makes no distinction between Islamic Jihadist and the Palestinian father trying to scrap out a living for his family. They're all scum in his eyes
So what would you say to people trying to say he is pro genocide?
Btw, damn fine work debunking all that. It was beautiful
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
So you do indeed think he is pro genocide? Yes or no, is Ben Shaprio pro genocide?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Yes you did, and then since then you have made other posts.
Do you agree with Rocky yes or no? Simple question. You are behaving like you do so I just want to set the record straight.
Rocky thinks he is pro genocide and more or less compared him to Hitler. Are these things you are on board with?
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
No worries take your time, it's not that important. It'll be interesting to read whenever it's posted though. I get the feeling ownage will commence.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Gender: Male Location: The Proud Nation of Kekistan
Yeah DarthSkywalker0 just kinda shits on literally anyone else here kek
I'm just waiting for his opponents to go "TLDR"... even though they were willing to read the lengthier article on Ben Shapiro and circle jerk to it.
__________________
Shadilay my brothers and sisters. With any luck we will throw off the shackles of normie oppression. We have nothing to lose but our chains! Praise Kek!
THE MOTTO IS "IN KEK WE TRUST"
KMC Community Forums
Dec 11th, 2017 11:45 PM
