Originally posted by jinzin
he's crappy because he not only lost, but he got flat out owned.. he's also been EASILY defeated by shang chi, and a third tier MA like Moon Knight.. He doesn't have any feats that portray him to be anywhere near even Kitty Prides level of skill much less guys like Cap and Wolverine.
He got flat out owned because he's inferior to Spiderman in every single way except fighting skill, logic dictates that he stood no chance.
Originally posted by jinzinI never said it would negate every point made, but the point of the matter is comics aren't made to accurately portray matches. They're meant to tell a story. Characters will pretty much always fight to a stalemate or an inconclusive fight, because that's how comics work. Spiderman doesn't even fight the same against guys like Cap (who he idolizes) and Logan (who he really doesn't bother with unless he insults his wife), as he would against someone of Venom, Carnage's, or Toxin's level. Spiderman won't use the environment or hit the same or any of that. It's just how it is. I don't have a tendency to go with "it's crap just because" because I more than anyone else will explain my point on any position based on fighting, strength, or any other logical basis. I know the supporters on Wolverine's side like the "I like it because it makes my character look good, and I'll ignore what doesn't. Because when it all comes down to it, featwars are just pointless circular arguments that don't conclude to anything because the fight on the forum hasn't happened the same way.
I'm not sure why you think their actions or luck would change so drastically on the forums as to negate every point those feats make.
If we're to believe that the only reason spiderman is getting hit is because it's in his personality type (a logic which I've heard but don't personally subscribe to), then again I defect to the fact that CIS isn't left out of these debates. The reason why I bring them up, is because when something happens, and happens often then I think it has some level of validity in these debates, I know that you havea tendancy to go with "it's crap because it's crap" but I disagree with that, and I disagree with you when you discard feats of highly skilled MA's doing well against Spiderman based on popularity alone.