Wolverine vs. Spider-Man

Stark said max power but: his suit was temporarily drained from slowing the fall from the building and landing on the ground or he didn't want to kill Peter. Either way it wasn't full power. Tony's repulsors weren't even working at the time. Tony had no problem bursting out of the web once his suit was powered up again.

My point in showing the webbing feat was only to illustrate Peter's webbing abilities and in no way was I trying to show that his webbing could overwhelm Tony's full power uni-beam....because it couldn't. 😬

Originally posted by masterbruce
So he attempted to fire his most powerful beam with the intention of missing?

Originally posted by masterbruce
now you're reaching.

Originally posted by masterbruce
The proof is conclusive that Tony only intended to blind Parker, which he succeeded, by amping his beam to maximum power, therefore so bright Parker couldn't see.

Going by your logic however we can say that the people who dropped the napalm on Wolverine only intended to make a crater underneath him. The proof is pretty conclusive in the fact that even Wolverine's pants were just fine so obviously the napalm was designed to only effect rock. 🙄

Sounds kinda retarded to use circular reasoning that begs the question doesn't it? But hey, that's your logic after all.

the beam only stopped cuz Parker's webbing covered it...or else Peter wouldn't be able to see at all.

he didn't 'announce' the attack...he gave a voice command to his suit.

Originally posted by masterbruce
the beam only stopped cuz Parker's webbing covered it...or else Peter wouldn't be able to see at all.

he didn't 'announce' the attack...he gave a voice command to his suit.

Your pathetic excuses are falling rather short. It's not a valid feat. you've failed to prove that it is valid as speculation (especailly that which contradicts which was stated on panel) is not a valid argument.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Reaching....

Your pathetic excuses are falling rather short. It's not a valid feat. you've failed to prove that it is valid as speculation (especailly that which contradicts which was stated on panel) is not a valid argument.

what you say doesn't make sense. You're saying Iron Man announced his attack so Spiderman can avoid it...does that make sense to you, huh huh?

Originally posted by masterbruce
what you say doesn't make sense. You're saying Iron Man announced his attack so Spiderman can avoid it...does that make sense to you, huh huh?

But it doesn't matter what you say either. It's PIS plain and simple. And nothing you say is going to change that as you obviously don't know how to make the feat valid, as all you're offering up are lame excuses.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Yes, it makes perfect sense. If he doesn't want to kill him but wants it to look like he's doing his job.

But it doesn't matter what you say either. It's PIS plain and simple. And nothing you say is going to change that as you obviously don't know how to make the feat valid, as all you're offering up are lame excuses.

you're like a brick, except a brick doesn't offer poor logic.

So you're telling me that Tony, would knowinlgy waste a lot of power to his armor by using a beam that he INTENDS to miss at full power??? yeah no logic there.

My explanation is much more logical. Tony intends to blind Parker by amping to max power. Parker is blinded and scared and fires his webbing like never before and coveres tony in web.

It's not PIS just because you don't like it.

Originally posted by masterbruce
you're like a brick, except a brick doesn't offer poor logic.

Originally posted by masterbruce
So you're telling me that Tony, would knowinlgy waste a lot of power to his armor by using a beam that he INTENDS to miss at full power??? yeah no logic there.

Originally posted by masterbruce
My explanation is much more logical. Tony intends to blind Parker by amping to max power. Parker is blinded and scared and fires his webbing like never before and coveres tony in web.

"Maximum power doesn't mean maximum power"

Yeah, that's completely "more logical".

Originally posted by masterbruce
It's not PIS just because you don't like it.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Said the pot...

It makes perfect sense if you have common sense.. oops, guess you don't then. Take the spidey googles off and put down your fanboyism and you'd understand that this feat is PIS.

If by "more logical" you mean "retarded and full of fanboyism" then yes, you are alot "more logical" than I am or ever will be.

"Maximum power doesn't mean maximum power"

Yeah, that's completely "more logical".

You're right, It's PIS because it's PIS. and its not not PIS because you like it, "more logical" .

do you see any beams shooting out in the scan? no, I see only bright light.

gee, to you, that must mean a beam shot out and not a bright light! And I'm the illogical one without common sense?

what you're saying completely contradicts onpanel illustration.

Also, do you know what a dimmer light is? I have a couple in my house, and when I turn them on MAX POWER, the lights go brighter...gee what a shocking revelation.

Originally posted by masterbruce
do you see any beams shooting out in the scan? no, I see only bright light.

Originally posted by masterbruce
gee, to you, that must mean a beam shot out and not a bright light! And I'm the illogical one without common sense?

Originally posted by masterbruce
what you're saying completely contradicts onpanel illustration.

And now YOU asre going to get nitpicky about the way the artist depicted the scene? Then should I get on your case again about the different angles that the webbing was shooting off from which would be impossible to acheive from parker's standing position?

Originally posted by masterbruce
Also, do you know what a dimmer light is? I have a couple in my house, and when I turn them on MAX POWER, the lights go brighter...gee what a shocking revelation.

Again, more lame excuses. You are so much "more logical" than me that you're just about as "more logical" as Quanchi, phenomenol, 2damnloud, rutog, spidey-dude or stormfront.

They're alot "more logical".

we have all seen what ironman blasts look like, and they don't like like just a light...it's ALWAYS in the form of a beam.

you're just being stubborn because you want to save face since i've proved your interpretation to be ridiculous and unfounded.

but then, what should one expect from a jubilee fanboy? 🙄

Originally posted by masterbruce
we have all seen what ironman blasts look like, and they don't like like just a light...it's ALWAYS in the form of a beam.

The webs shot off at angles that were impossible to acheive.

Originally posted by masterbruce
you're just being stubborn because you want to save face since i've proved your interpretation to be ridiculous and unfounded.

Originally posted by masterbruce
but then, what should one expect from a jubilee fanboy?

😆 Based off of me having a sig and avatar of her? Guess that makes everyone a fanboy of the sig and avatar they sport doesn't it. "MASTERBRUCE"

At least I don't overhype her to levels she's not... unlike certain spiderman fanboys do with spiderman. 😉

Originally posted by Creshosk

At least I don't overhype her to levels she's not... unlike certain spiderman fanboys do with spiderman. 😉

I'm no fanboy of spiderman. You're just a grade A douche.

Originally posted by masterbruce
I'm no fanboy of spiderman.

Denial is an ugly thing... fitting that you're sporting it.

Originally posted by masterbruce
You're just a grade A douche.

But then you're also still a douche yourself.

Originally posted by Creshosk

Denial is an ugly thing... fitting that you're sporting it.

*clap* *clap*

How old are you, really? jeez, some posters here are immature 🙄

Originally posted by masterbruce
*clap* *clap*

How old are you, really? jeez, some posters here are immature 🙄

Originally posted by masterbruce
*clap* *clap*

How old are you, really? jeez, some posters here are immature 🙄

Yeah, that's another pot calling the kettle black.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Coming from the one who decided to use a feminine hygeine product as an insult first?

Yeah, that's another pot calling the kettle black.

umm...you resorted to insults first. 😐

Originally posted by masterbruce
umm...you resorted to insults first. 😐

Oh wait, that was you calling me a brick...

Originally posted by Creshosk
Oh you mean when I called you a brick?

Oh wait, that was you calling me a brick...

brick is not an insult...it just means you're very stubborn

also, I believe you accused me of being a spiderman fanboy first 😐