The Beatles

Started by Punkyhermy43 pages

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You think people should be rated musically just because of how they fared successfully in general?

why do you ask?

you can think of the beatles whatever you want. why are you trying to drag this?

So can you discuss music, or do you honestly just turn up to fangirl out and bump the thread?

LOL.

did you read the response i got from you above right there?

if that is your "discussion" as it often is; chalking up half arsed assumptions about the posters involved.and then basing whatever "argument" you have, which also will be the daily centauri special of big sentenced words talking little ideas, on those assumptions so... erm no thanks.🙂

Poor, very poor.

Originally posted by Punkyhermy
why do you ask?

you can think of the beatles whatever you want. why are you trying to drag this?

I'm asking because I want to know what you think, you can answer the question can't you? Or are you honestly more concerned with replying AT me than TO my posts that are relevant to the thread?

You...DO want to discuss The Beatles don't you?

Originally posted by Punkyhermy
LOL.

did you read the response i got from you above right there?

if that is your "discussion" as it often is; chalking up half arsed assumptions about the posters involved.and then basing whatever "argument" you have, which also will be the daily centauri special of big well sentenced words talking little ideas, on those assumptions so... erm no thanks.🙂

You just proved my point. You can't discuss The Beatles, you don't WANT to discuss them, you want to bump the thread and fangirl out to annoy others.

Sad woman.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm asking because I want to know what you think, you can answer the question can't you? Or are you honestly more concerned with replying AT me than TO my posts that are relevant to the thread?

You...DO want to discuss The Beatles don't you?

fair enough.

so no. i don't think that.


You just proved my point. You can't discuss The Beatles, you don't WANT to discuss them, you want to bump the thread and fangirl out to annoy others.

Sad woman.

-AC

fail.

i don't want to "discuss" the beatles with you.

If you cant debate, don't reply. It's a lot more admirable.

alright, AC first of all, by arguing between the two of you all you are doing is spamming the thread anyways, which is what you were complaining about, is it so hard to ingore one post of fangirl-ism, imo there are entirely worse people who spam by making a pointless thread to spam all over kmc. Secondly, its not like its off topic, its just expressing a likenesss for a Beatles song through the post of a lyric or something along similar lines.

Originally posted by Mr. Bacon
alright, AC first of all, by arguing between the two of you all you are doing is spamming the thread anyways, which is what you were complaining about, is it so hard to ingore one post of fangirl-ism, imo there are entirely worse people who spam by making a pointless thread to spam all over kmc. Secondly, its not like its off topic, its just expressing a likenesss for a Beatles song through the post of a lyric or something along similar lines.

I appreciate the defense of your OTF partner in crime, but impartiality is nice. I'm not abusing her, I'm stating the obvious.

You ask if it's hard to ignore; no, not initially. She, however, is bumping this thread all the time after it falls off the page. Sometimes with nothing more than a line, a lyric or a word. That is not only very ignorant but it's against the rules.

If you're going to defend someone, make sure they're in the right first.

I've seen you around and you don't seem like a bad person, or remotely annoying, you've done nothing to give me any reason to have a pop at you, so don't take this as one. I'm just suggesting you don't be so quick to defend.

Originally posted by Punkyhermy
fair enough.

so no. i don't think that.

Well then can we agree that The Beatles are often rated incorrectly? Their music receiving praise for the cultural force they were, I mean. Because they were not a cultural force purely off their music. Lots of people liked it, but that doesn't and hasn't ever meant anything regarding quality in music.

If someone thinks they are the best band who made the best music ever, fine, subjective taste. However, to say they made the best music BASED ON facts that have NOTHING to do with music, is ignorant, no?

Originally posted by Punkyhermy
fail.

i don't want to "discuss" the beatles with you

You just can't.

You want to sit here gushing over them and bumping the thread needlessly, as mods have noticed, because you're a female, biased fan of The Beatles.

The worst kind of fan of any band.

No offense, but it's proven to be quite accurate throughout history.

-AC

hmm i see your point however, im saying at least if its bumped its not like this

"random bump" that happens all the time at least its pertinent to the topic, all the two of you are doing is creating an endless argument over a couple posts that are not harming anyone. shrug

She actively searches for the thread just to post a lyric that is of no use or purpose whatsoever, then gives a bs reason as to why, when if she had actually said that in the initial bump, there's not be a problem.

At least bump it with something to discuss, she doesn't do that, cos she doesn't want to discuss them, she wants to find someone to mindlessly gush and fangirl with.

-AC

thats not true, thats just your perception, ive had many intelligent conversations of all Beatles aspects with her outside KMC

The discussion's about what she posts on KMC, not everything Beatles related she's ever said or done.

So what? She has them with you, therefore she isn't looking for someone to fangirl with HERE?

Hardly.

There's simply a limit to which you can discuss any band really. Especially The Beatles, and my only point is that if you cannot think of anything better than exchanging "I like this song.", "I like it too.", then what's the point? Certainly don't bump a thread for it, and certainly don't moan when people express opinions that aren't rabidly positive.

She goes around calling the man Sir Paul, she's a Beatles kiss-ass.

The point is, we are now keeping this thread up. There's a reason it falls off the page; nobody currently gives a shit enough to discuss them. Punky wants the thread up cos she likes them, that isn't our problem.

-AC

he is a knight, i have never known her to be a gushy fan girl, ever.

So? So is Alex Ferguson.

Originally posted by Mr. Bacon
he is a knight, i have never known her to be a gushy fan girl, ever.

I know that, but people are reasonable and sensible enough to call the man Paul McCartney.

Sir Paul? Pretentious in ways The Mars Volta would find offensive. It's correct, and it's up to her, I'm just saying she's not making her case for not being a fangirl any better.

Either way, you're biased because you are her friend, so your side of the argument is tainted from the off.

-AC

no im not biased, you are assuming things about her that just are part of her personality. so what if she calls him that, do you call all people in sports or movies by their rightful name? i doubt if she met him in person she would say "Sir Paul"

Originally posted by Mr. Bacon
no im not biased, you are assuming things about her that just are part of her personality. so what if she calls him that, do you call all people in sports or movies by their rightful name? i doubt if she met him in person she would say "Sir Paul"

So then being a fangirl is part of her personality, ok, great.

You're biased because you're her friend, to deny it is ludicrous.

The fact that your first and only reply to me, ever in this forum, was and will continue to be in defense of her is evidence.

It's obvious, you defend your friend because she is your friend. Let's not turn the thread into a debate about that anyway.

-AC

I defend her one because youre making assumptions about her when you dont know her, and two you jump to conclusions, being a fangirl isnt a part of someones personality at all. That would imply shes a fangirl of everything she likes, which is just "ludicrous". I have disagreed with her on many occaisions on various topics, i dont automatically agree with her just becasue were friends. Im done with this discussion, this thread is dedicated to the beatles, as long as its pertinent to the beatles, i dont see a problem.

Originally posted by Mr. Bacon
I defend her one because youre making assumptions about her when you dont know her

I'm making assumptions based on evidence in this thread and the way she acts.

You are defending her because you know her. I never see you coming and defending anyone in similar positions. You're biased for your friend, why deny it?

I don't need to be her friend off KMC to make the claims I am.

Originally posted by Mr. Bacon
and two you jump to conclusions, being a fangirl isnt a part of someones personality at all. That would imply shes a fangirl of everything she likes, which is just "ludicrous". I have disagreed with her on many occaisions on various topics, i dont automatically agree with her just becasue were friends. Im done with this discussion, this thread is dedicated to the beatles, as long as its pertinent to the beatles, i dont see a problem.

You don't see a problem, good for you. Many of us, including mods, do. She bumped a thread needlessly as she often does, so I called her on it.

You are hardly ever in this forum, so you might know her, but her conduct here is obviously new to you. It's not new to me.

-AC

centauri, i've said it before and i am forced to repeat it again; you're delusional.😬 i can't see why people on this forum bother to entertain and feed your very limited, oft repeated view points on muzzik.

also, your biggest problem is that you attempt to extract music away from the things that nurture and cultivate it. it is not something in of itself. "music" exists because the human condition does.it is created by and because of people culture society.

take that away, and you have just molecules of air beating in rhythms unacknowledged.😬