The Beatles

Started by Kram3r43 pages

Originally posted by bakerboy
Yeah, this post by you is one good example of your stupidity.

You sucks, your music knowledges sucks and your posts sucks.

Reported for flaming.

Originally posted by bakerboy
Yeah, this post by you is one good example of your stupidity.

You sucks, your music knowledges sucks and your posts sucks.

Learn to type, spell, read, comprehend and just live without making yourself look so racist, nationalist and idiotic.

It's not very polite.

-AC

Originally posted by Kram3r
Reported for flaming.

Ohhhhhhhh, so sad. Dont forget the Centauri's posts.

About the last post by centauri, nothing to add. So boring and silly as always.

Oh, do feel free to shut up.

You're only in this forum because you reply to me. If I weren't here you'd have nothing to say.

-AC

For sure, i have been four years in these forums only for answer you.

What would be about my life without centauri's stupid posts? Really horrible.

Exactly, and you prove it by replying.

Go on, prove me right, because you do nothing but post when I do.

I went to your profile, looked at your last posts and wasn't surprised to find almost every reply in this music forum was to, or about, me.

-AC

Originally posted by wicker_man
Personally I think this band are overated. If Imagine had been writtein by anyone else it would have been dismissed as cheesy, but because it was Lennon it gained this Godly like status. The Beatles are just another band...FACT.

please be joking?

the beatles were like no other! without the beatles rock and music would not be what it is today.

'imagine' music without the beatles...it would be totally different

Originally posted by the welsh one
please be joking?

the beatles were like no other! without the beatles rock and music would not be what it is today.

'imagine' music without the beatles...it would be totally different

Not only is that post typical of a 16 year old looking for instant respect, but Imagine wasn't even a song by The Beatles.

Nice try, though.

-AC

Originally posted by the welsh one
please be joking?

the beatles were like no other! without the beatles rock and music would not be what it is today.

'imagine' music without the beatles...it would be totally different

And what about music without Sabbath or Zeppelin, Hendrix or Dylan?!?
Like I said just a band.

Originally posted by bakerboy
Ohhhhhhhh, so sad. Dont forget the Centauri's posts.

About the last post by centauri, nothing to add. So boring and silly as always.

That it? Hardly worth replying to, though they're also hardly worth reading so I'd suppose the two would go hand in hand.

Originally posted by wicker_man
And what about music without Sabbath or Zeppelin, Hendrix or Dylan?!?
Like I said just a band.

but along with the bands you named they were great for the future of music

its a shame that now you cant really name bands that are around now that were as good as those bands

Originally posted by the welsh one
but along with the bands you named they were great for the future of music

its a shame that now you cant really name bands that are around now that were as good as those bands

You can.

"Good" is opinion.

-AC

what bands do you think are as great as those bands? Sabbath or Zeppelin, Hendrix or Dylan

Why does it matter?

I'm saying you can say there are bands as good or better than those, if you like their music more, because you can.

-AC

bands like sabbath and beatles arnt too easy to find though

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Why does it matter?

I'm saying you can say there are bands as good or better than those, if you like their music more, because you can.

-AC

why do you never discuss music YOU like

Originally posted by the welsh one
why do you never discuss music YOU like

I do, all the time, but it's irrelevant to this discussion.

You asked me who I would say is as good or better, just so you can say "No, they're not.", I've been there a million times and it's pointless. It's not about my taste, or your taste, or anyone's taste.

It's about you saying you can't make the claim of "These bands are as good.", you can, if you think they are. Antiquity (That means older) does not give bands an untouchable barrier.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I do, all the time, but it's irrelevant to this discussion.

You asked me who I would say is as good or better, just so you can say "No, they're not.", I've been there a million times and it's pointless. It's not about my taste, or your taste, or anyone's taste.

It's about you saying you can't make the claim of "These bands are as good.", you can, if you think they are. Antiquity (That means older) does not give bands an untouchable barrier.

-AC

if you did name a few bands you think are better than the beatles and i did say they 'no thier not', why would it matter anyway.

but i like the beatles and there have been bettr bands i think

but at the moment the only bands that i think would compare to them would be red hot chillis or...... ill come back to you

Why is that relevant?

You said you cannot say there are any bands now as good as those he named, you can say that. It's all opinion.

-AC

Originally posted by wicker_man
And what about music without Sabbath or Zeppelin, Hendrix or Dylan?!?
Like I said just a band.
Without Sabbath there would be a big difference. I don't think Led Zeppelin and Bob Dylan made as a big a difference as some people think. The Yardbirds and Deep Purple have influenced nearly every band influenced by Led Zeppelin and Nick Drake is almost as influential as Bob Dylan in the world of mellow acoustic stuff.