Originally posted by wicker_man
Personally I think this band are overated. If Imagine had been writtein by anyone else it would have been dismissed as cheesy, but because it was Lennon it gained this Godly like status. The Beatles are just another band...FACT.
please be joking?
the beatles were like no other! without the beatles rock and music would not be what it is today.
'imagine' music without the beatles...it would be totally different
Originally posted by the welsh one
please be joking?the beatles were like no other! without the beatles rock and music would not be what it is today.
'imagine' music without the beatles...it would be totally different
Not only is that post typical of a 16 year old looking for instant respect, but Imagine wasn't even a song by The Beatles.
Nice try, though.
-AC
Originally posted by the welsh one
please be joking?the beatles were like no other! without the beatles rock and music would not be what it is today.
'imagine' music without the beatles...it would be totally different
And what about music without Sabbath or Zeppelin, Hendrix or Dylan?!?
Like I said just a band.
Originally posted by wicker_man
And what about music without Sabbath or Zeppelin, Hendrix or Dylan?!?
Like I said just a band.
but along with the bands you named they were great for the future of music
its a shame that now you cant really name bands that are around now that were as good as those bands
Originally posted by the welsh one
why do you never discuss music YOU like
I do, all the time, but it's irrelevant to this discussion.
You asked me who I would say is as good or better, just so you can say "No, they're not.", I've been there a million times and it's pointless. It's not about my taste, or your taste, or anyone's taste.
It's about you saying you can't make the claim of "These bands are as good.", you can, if you think they are. Antiquity (That means older) does not give bands an untouchable barrier.
-AC
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I do, all the time, but it's irrelevant to this discussion.You asked me who I would say is as good or better, just so you can say "No, they're not.", I've been there a million times and it's pointless. It's not about my taste, or your taste, or anyone's taste.
It's about you saying you can't make the claim of "These bands are as good.", you can, if you think they are. Antiquity (That means older) does not give bands an untouchable barrier.
-AC
if you did name a few bands you think are better than the beatles and i did say they 'no thier not', why would it matter anyway.
but i like the beatles and there have been bettr bands i think
but at the moment the only bands that i think would compare to them would be red hot chillis or...... ill come back to you
Originally posted by wicker_manWithout Sabbath there would be a big difference. I don't think Led Zeppelin and Bob Dylan made as a big a difference as some people think. The Yardbirds and Deep Purple have influenced nearly every band influenced by Led Zeppelin and Nick Drake is almost as influential as Bob Dylan in the world of mellow acoustic stuff.
And what about music without Sabbath or Zeppelin, Hendrix or Dylan?!?
Like I said just a band.