Originally posted by Q99
A jutsu on her person is shown talking about jutsu expiring.It could be called the 'mug mug' jutsu, the point would be the same.
The jutsu is shown in constant use in the fight itself- she's visibly part paper the entire time!
She could be talking about fireball and it still wouldn't be an argument for her not spending most of her time in paper form.
No she is not "paper" the entire time. You just said, previously, most of the time. Now you're changing it? Bad form. We also know from on panel evidence that she is not partial paper the entire time.
Lastly, all of your points are irrelevant or wrong to what I stated.
Originally posted by Q99
That everyone but you is in on? C'mon.No-one at Naruto Wikia thinks she doesn't spend most of her time in paper.
No-one else here does.
I can find no-one who agrees with you on this topic at all.
You're lying and moving the goal posts. Stay on topic.
What you're lying about is that everyone agrees what the tech was that she could no longer maintain. No more of this lying stuff. Do not shift what is talked about to fit your dishonest agenda.
Like I said, almost every location I can find (minus the Naruto Wiki discussion page) shows that jutsu being the massive paper bomb attack she did against Tobi. Then add in that Databook III clearly tells us what her "paper body" tech is actually called (and even gives us pictures), then we can end the discussion/debate.
Originally posted by Q99
Look at the first date in the post I made:on this information and its validity cannot be vouched for."
Go to the talk page for elaboration:
"Which info is false ? It seems correct to my knowledge. --speysider (talk) 16:15, [b]March 9, 2012 (UTC)
In the chapter the paper ocean thing was used, Konan talked about how her "Paper Person of God" technique was dissipating because of her having used too much chakra. However, she never specifically mentioned the paper ocean thing to be that technique. Therefore, the assumption that she was referring to this technique can be regarded as false info.--Kind-Hearted-One (talk) 16:33, March 9, 2012 (UTC)"
March 9 2012![/B]
I am open to you actually proving that the disclaimer has been on the page since March 2012. However, that disclaimer has been on the page for over a year. I, seriously, looked through dozens of edits and still could not find when they added the disclaimer. I stopped after looking through 50 edits and nothing you said matches up. It looks like the first mention of "false info" occurs in August of 2011. The next section occurs after august, in March, and that post is asking "what false info" which clearly supports what I am talking about. I was off by 3 months, however: it's been 9 months, not a year.
My point was, that disclaimer has been on the page since the last time we argued about Konan last year. We had our argument in September. Now is it clicking?
Originally posted by Q99
And you're also skipping over: Previous topics resolved in favor of it not being the correct name.You're the one being dishonest here.
Incorrect and that was again, dishonest of you. You're going out of your way to lie, still. It was resolved back in 2011 when they referenced the databook: the databook clearly indicated the tech you are referring to as being Shikigami no Mai.
Originally posted by Q99
Last post by a mod from the past debate:
"I'd say the names match the abilities pretty well, actually. The Paper Angel Technique, in my opinion, is not the giant chasm of paper Konan created. I think it refers either to her ability to turn herself (and other things) into paper, or her ability to control that paper. When Konan mentioned her technique was cancelling, her hair ornament and all the other paper flowers started to fall apart. —ShounenSuki (talk | contribs | translations) 11:46, September 17, 2010 (UTC)"The posts by non-mods after agree.
Again, you're being dishonest. You're lying directly right now, it's absurd.
You are taking only snip-its of the conversation to fit your dishonest agenda. It was resolved, by an Admin, on the Naruto wiki, by referencing the Third Databook.
"The databook reference cites the information in the infobox (rank, classification, etc.) A translation of the entry itself can be found here. ~SnapperTo 21:54, April 26, 2011 (UTC) "
And, again, only two people had differing opinions on what I was talking about.
Here one is:
"The unexpected kinjutsu of the title is Tobi's use of Izanagi. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:45, March 10, 2012 (UTC) "
That was directly address with this:
"Sealed within an ocean of paper ... a secret technique protects Nagato Konan displays her ultimate paper technique, trying to send Madara into the abyss My paper angel technique wore off It's sure it, and also what you said Omni ... it can work both ways. --Elveonora (talk) 16:58, March 10, 2012 (UTC) "
Now no more of your lies and agenda, please. You have been thoroughly destroyed, by this point.
Go ahead, now start posting another old section at me and pretending it is some how relevant. I'll be here, working.
Originally posted by Q99
They came to a clear conclusion different from what you say.
The did not. Just the opposite.
Originally posted by Q99
Do not accuse people of dishonest when you haven't read what you're talking about.
Wrong: you stop being dishonest with your approach to the topic by both ignoring the decisive counter arguments to your fanboy agenda. I read the discussions before this recent argument even began. I read them earlier today when I linked you with the "let me google that for you" as well.
So, again, stop with your dishonest approach to the topic. Stop ignoring the portions that have destroyed your approach. Stop ignoring every time I reference the Third Databook that clearly and decisively ended this discussion.
Originally posted by Q99
And gee, seeing the jutsu actively turn off, and seeing it on constantly on the rest of the time, and seeing her mention that she's low on chakra (yes, not completely out, but exhausted and clearly low and turning off persisted jutsu), and seeing no-one but you think that she isn't in paper form most of the time, and having actually seen her operate in a logia-like fashion where major damage to paper does nothing all counts for nothing?
More lies. Stop lying.
You are also contradicting yourself.
She is not "paper" the entire time. You just said, previously, most of the time. Now you're changing it? Bad form. We also know from on panel evidence that she is not partial paper the entire time.
So there goes your entire argument, again.
And, before I allow you to continue to move the goalposts...
This argument started with you saying she was out of chakra when she clearly was not.
Originally posted by Q99
Not impressed.Not impressed with insults either.
No insults occurred. Stop playing a victim.
You should have actually addressed those points that clearly show how wrong you are. You avoided them. Your entire approach to the topic has been childish, as of late. You ignore the portions that show you are wrong and then take other portions out of context to fit your agenda. How can you expect to be taken seriously?