Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
The way the panels are shown, in addition to the SFX, suggest that they launched their attacks at that instant, and together.Nope. The reason his Gold neutralized Gaara's sand was because it mixed into the Sand, making it much harder for Gaara to manipulate it. He didn't slow the Sand's momentum by forcing his Gold to act as a wall to 'cancel out' Gaara's Sand Tsunami. He stopped it by making the Sand harder for Gaara to control.
While I agree with the first part, what actually occurs suggests otherwise. So what we think is happening is not really happening because Gaara launches his after YK's.
Incorrect: the sand types did not readily mix. In fact, we see them "splat" off of each other. So that theories out.
We actually know the reason: the gold sand is heavier so it neutralizes Gaara's sand's movement as long as YK keeps enough momentum.
Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
I meant impurity in the sense that the Gold dust mixed in with the Sand. Hence the word impurity in my sentence being in quotes. 😐
I know this. The fact that your previous section, that I replied to, still contains this "impurity concept" does not change what I said.
Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
The explanation given was that Gold was heavier, and that by putting it into the Sand, he could stop Gaara/Shukaku from manipulating Sand. You seem to be thinking that he stops the Sand by using his Gold dust to put up an equal and opposite amount of force and momentum.
You're almost there with me.
He says it's heavier and dulled the movement of Gaara's sand.
So I'll agree that it's actually both of what we're saying. Mixing is not the reason: it's the density of the gold "dust" sand that nulls Gaara's sand's movement. it does not mix, readily, either...it's more bouncing off. Look at the panel, again. It seems to actually stop the sand almost completely like two balls in a classic momentum test in a highschool physics class.
The second time they clash, it all falls down as one big blob...but Gaara still has his sand rise from the "sand" and continue onward. So it's what I was saying and what YK was saying: it's a momentum stopper.
Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
I think you are pulling shit from thin air.
I got it from your keyboard. uhuh
Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
If you concentrate too much chakra into your feet while climbing a tree, your foot goes into the wood, cracking the bark, and leaving a nice small hole in the shape of your foot. There is no way that would happen if a lesser amount of chakra was being used to grip a much larger area than that of your foot.
The first part is actually a chakra control problem: concentrating too much into one area, instead of deeply into the tree and at the precise moment of contact, results in a failure, like you describe.
I see, now, why you said it's shit: the idea makes so much sense it makes your post that I replied to look like a newb post. estahuh
Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
In addition, if he were gripping close to a thousand tons of Earth by concentrating chakra on his feet, how do you explain Ma & Pa not moving from where they were standing when Naruto was hit? Were they gripping the thousand tonner Chakra scroll they were standing on with the super duper version of the tree walking chakra technique?
Are you trying to prove my point because it makes perfect sense if that's exactly what they were doing.
I'm confused...it looks like you're supporting my position.
Originally posted by Demonic Phoenix
How do you explain Naruto [b]completely stopping a moving giant snake while on a tree branch in the Forest of Death, with said tree branch being unaffected around Naruto's feet? The tree branch was 1000 tonnes? [/B]
That's quite easy to explain:
1. The tree was ginormously huge so it obviously had quite a bit of its own inertia.
2. Kishi doesn't think of every thing.
3. If Naruto was just "gripping" the surface, he would have slid right off with a chunk of bark attached to his feet.
So where do we stand? From what I can see, you've only supported my points. Why? Is this some secret "I agree with you" technique. hmm