Inglourious Basterds

Started by Rogue Jedi16 pages

Not by much, but it did have that opening scene where the chicks are talking and talking and talking and talking and talking at the beginning. STFU and make your bewbz bounce, Rosario.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Not by much, but it did have that opening scene where the chicks are talking and talking and talking and talking and talking at the beginning. STFU and make your bewbz bounce, Rosario.

Wow, that's not sexist or anything.

Can we please just get back on the topic of Inglourious Basterds...

Originally posted by Blinky
Character development was severely lacking. If you disagree ; go f*ck yourself.

Quit the language! One more and you'll be given a warning.

Originally posted by Selphie
Wow, that's not sexist or anything.

Can we please just get back on the topic of Inglourious Basterds...

Wow, and it wasn't sarcasm or anything 🙄

K

Movie sucked worse the second time.

You have "The Crow" as your sig so... yeah, not gonna take you that seriously.

K. Cuz The Crow wasn't totally epic, was it? 🙄

Originally posted by Blinky
Character development was severely lacking. If you disagree ; go f*ck yourself.

I just don't have the time. 😬

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
K. Cuz The Crow wasn't totally epic, was it? 🙄

It was terrible, imo.

Originally posted by SnakeEyes
It was terrible, imo.
OK,I respect your opinion, why not respect mine that I thought Basterds was shit? The Crow has a huge following, much larger than Basterds I'd bet, and I'm not the only one here who thinks it's shit.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
K. Cuz The Crow wasn't totally epic, was it? 🙄

I certainly enjoyed the story as I LOVE revenge stories. I also enjoyed the dark, gothic look and feel for the film. Also, the character development was really nice.

However, the acting was just horrible. Terrible. There were a couple decent actors in it. But all around, just terrible. For me, that almost ruined the film.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
OK,I respect your opinion, why not respect mine that I thought Basterds was shit? The Crow has a huge following, much larger than Basterds I'd bet, and I'm not the only one here who thinks it's shit.

Actually, no, IG would have a much bigger fan following because it was successful and it's new.

Also, IG did well more than twice as well, domestically, and 6 times as well, worldwide, as The Crow did.

Domestic: $120,540,719
Worldwide: $311,710,915

And the average grade for the film by "readers" is B+ with the vast majority of the grades being "As".

The "F" and "D" votes are less than 12% of the "A" vote, indicating that the movie was "hated" far less than it was liked. (This will be used in a second to compare to The Crow.) It had a total of 100 D and F votes out of 1334 votes. (only 3 more votes to make IG LEET, baby. LEEEEET!)

http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=inglouriousbasterds.htm

Here's how The Crow breaks down:

Domestic Gross: $50,693,129
No word wide figures.

Average grade is a B- with a plurality of votes coming it at the "Bs" mark. The film got 70% Fs and Ds as it did As...meaning, many more people rated this film very poorly than rated IG poorly. Almost twice as many people...and that's with The Crow getting 300 votes less.

http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=crow.htm

In other words, just looking at the numbers, more people watched IG in the theaters. More people also rated it higher. And far less people give the movie poor markings.

Personally, I don't think The Crow even holds a candle to IG. IG ist still my favorite movie of the year.

Originally posted by Impediment
Quit the language! One more and you'll be given a warning.

I know you have to uphold the rules 'cause that's your job. I don't mind, though. Blinky and I are homies. I know he wasn't serious. However, thanks for keeping a vigilant eye and doing a good job as a mod.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I know you have to uphold the rules 'cause that's your job. I don't mind, though. Blinky and I are homies. I know he wasn't serious. However, thanks for keeping a vigilant eye and doing a good job as a mod.

Oh, okay. F*ck it, then.

Again, I think that IB is a very well made film. Christoph Waltz deserves nothing less than an Academy Award nom for his role as Landa. Still, my only major gripe is the pacing. Its.................so................slllllloooooooowwwwwww.

Why's it being abbreviated to IG? Doesn't IB make much more sense?

Originally posted by dadudemon
I certainly enjoyed the story as I LOVE revenge stories. I also enjoyed the dark, gothic look and feel for the film. Also, the character development was really nice.

However, the acting was just horrible. Terrible. There were a couple decent actors in it. But all around, just terrible. For me, that almost ruined the film.

Actually, no, IG would have a much bigger fan following because it was successful and it's new.

Also, IG did well more than twice as well, domestically, and 6 times as well, worldwide, as The Crow did.

Domestic: $120,540,719
Worldwide: $311,710,915

And the average grade for the film by "readers" is B+ with the vast majority of the grades being "As".

The "F" and "D" votes are less than 12% of the "A" vote, indicating that the movie was "hated" far less than it was liked. (This will be used in a second to compare to The Crow.) It had a total of 100 D and F votes out of 1334 votes. (only 3 more votes to make IG LEET, baby. LEEEEET!)

http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=inglouriousbasterds.htm

Here's how The Crow breaks down:

Domestic Gross: $50,693,129
No word wide figures.

Average grade is a B- with a plurality of votes coming it at the "Bs" mark. The film got 70% Fs and Ds as it did As...meaning, many more people rated this film very poorly than rated IG poorly. Almost twice as many people...and that's with The Crow getting 300 votes less.

http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=crow.htm

In other words, just looking at the numbers, more people watched IG in the theaters. More people also rated it higher. And far less people give the movie poor markings.

Personally, I don't think The Crow even holds a candle to IG. IG ist still my favorite movie of the year.

I know you have to uphold the rules 'cause that's your job. I don't mind, though. Blinky and I are homies. I know he wasn't serious. However, thanks for keeping a vigilant eye and doing a good job as a mod.

Did I say IG made less money? A movie doesn't have to make alot of money to have a huge following. Boondock Saints FTW.

Originally posted by Kovacs86
Why's it being abbreviated to IG? Doesn't IB make much more sense?

Yeah, it technically should be initialized as "IB" or "I.B." But, I am too lazy to reach down that far on the keyboard. Really, I should have abbreviated to "Ig." but that was too much thought.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Did I say IG made less money? A movie doesn't have to make alot of money to have a huge following. Boondock Saints FTW.

1. You're missing it.

2. Prove that The Crow has more of a following that Ig.

Originally posted by dadudemon
1. You're missing it.

2. Prove that The Crow has more of a following that Ig.

I can't. I said "I bet", not "It does".

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I can't. I said "I bet", not "It does".

You said "The Crow has a huge following, much larger than Basterds I'd bet..."

So, you believe it so much that you'd be willing to bet on it. That's more than a solid convinction.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You said "The Crow has a huge following, much larger than Basterds I'd bet..."

So, you believe it so much that you'd be willing to bet on it. That's more than a solid convinction.

Take things too literally much? 🙄 🙄 Fine, here's a dollar.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Take things too literally much? 🙄 🙄 Fine, here's a dollar.

*Relishes the dollar*

*Eats the dollar on a hot dog...cause it has relish on it, now*

*Poops it out, 18 hours later*

*Relishes the dollar again for old times sake*

*Eats the rerelished dollar on the poop dog, for old times sake*

18 hours? Felt like IG was at least that long.