Originally posted by plenTpak52
Wait since when do women have a higher tolerance for pain?
Relax Lils. I'll field this question.
When was the last time you squeezed something the size of a watermelon out of something that starts out smaller than a quish?
I dunno if it really backs the arguement of who has a higher pain tolerance. But it IS an example of women withstanding extreme conditions.
Originally posted by plenTpak52
Wait since when do women have a higher tolerance for pain?
Since it was their genetic role to give birth to live young, which is very painful or so I'm told.
Cyclops--that's... lame... you can't let somebody join a government run organization based solely on their sex... If that had been a guy you can bet the judge would have just laughed at him. When people's lives are on the line, you can't be making exceptions like that.
they would be able to if their bodies were built to carry and deliver a child. But that claim will not happen due to physical differences between men and female.
I'd compare it to passing a kidney stone, but it'd be a kidney stone that would be too big for the urethra to stretch....Like the size of a golf ball or something.
OUCH!
Originally posted by Linkalicious
Relax Lils. I'll field this question.When was the last time you squeezed something the size of a watermelon out of something that starts out smaller than a quish?
I dunno if it really backs the arguement of who has a higher pain tolerance. But it IS an example of women withstanding extreme conditions.
EDIT, oh i get it.
i don't see what a pain threshold has to do with this arguement anyways.
If you get shot....it's gonna hurt regardless. If it's a stomach or chest wound, you'll be on the floor whether your threshold is high or low. If you get hit in the leg, you won't be running or probably walking at all...don't matter if your threshold is high or low.