Batman vs Spiderman

Started by who?-kid343 pages

Originally posted by lifeisaglich
Batman's jaw is deadly most vulnerable to spidey's attack. But then again batman is the better fighter.

No he isn't. Their fighting styles are very different, you can not compare them.

Was Bruce Lee a better fighter than Cassius Clay ? Is Picasso a better painter than Vermeer ? You can argue the rest of your life about these questions, but it's no use : different styles.

You simply can not compare different styles.

Only the fighters.

"what...did you see it over the net or what?

was the action kickass though?"

Oh I got free tickets for a special screening from work.

The action was pretty kickass, but a little blurry.

My major gripe was that the guy they chose to play Batman had the worst Batman voice i've ever heard and he looked kind of like a sissy. He looked pretty bad in costume too.

This movie did kick the crap out of the last couple Batman movies. (I'd say it was better than all of them.) It is a little slow paced in the beginning though.

(SPOILERS)
Bruce Wayne becomes Batman.

Originally posted by 8bitChris
"what...did you see it over the net or what?

was the action kickass though?"

Oh I got free tickets for a special screening from work.

The action was pretty kickass, but a little blurry.

My major gripe was that the guy they chose to play Batman had the worst Batman voice i've ever heard and he looked kind of like a sissy. He looked pretty bad in costume too.

This movie did kick the crap out of the last couple Batman movies. (I'd say it was better than all of them.) It is a little slow paced in the beginning though.

You're still a cheater.

Originally posted by 8bitChris
(SPOILERS)
Bruce Wayne becomes Batman.

Gasp!

Originally posted by who?-kid
No he isn't. Their fighting styles are very different, you can not compare them.

Was Bruce Lee a better fighter than Cassius Clay ? Is Picasso a better painter than Vermeer ? You can argue the rest of your life about these questions, but it's no use : different styles.

You simply can not compare different styles.

😆

Because different styles are simply a matter of opinion.

despitye one style being able to handle another style, since you know they'd be used against each other in a fight.

I guess your fighting style that you personally use can take on jet li right? I mean since it's just a different style and all. 😆

look at him doing what he does best, i guess everyone needs a hobby.

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
look at him doing what he does best, i guess everyone needs a hobby.
Attacking illogical thought, it's what I do. 🙂

Originally posted by Creshosk
Because different styles are simply a matter of opinion.

Wrong (again).
I guess your fighting style that you personally use can take on jet li right? I mean since it's just a different style and all. 😆

Hm, was I talking about me vs Jet Li ? No sir. Have I implied such a thing ? Nope. I was talking about Cassius Clay against Bruce Lee.

Two great fighters with each their own way of fighting. Which one is the best ? I don't know. Same thing with Batman and Spider-Man. You can argue all you want, but you can not PROVE one has a better fighting technique than the other.

I DO know however who is the fastest, the strongest and the most durable (tip : he ain't wearing a cape). Now THAT's something we can not argue about.

man the most unorthodox, and unique fighting style is better, besides he has better speed etc. that makes him notches above the best a martial artist can hope to aspire.

most styles eventually bleed of others as derivatives anyway.

Originally posted by who?-kid
Wrong (again).
😆 😂 😂lol2

You just pwnd yourself dude. That was YOUR argument.

Originally posted by who?-kid
Hm, was I talking about me vs Jet Li ? No sir. Have I implied such a thing ? Nope. I was talking about Cassius Clay against Bruce Lee.

Two great fighters with each their own way of fighting. Which one is the best ? I don't know. Same thing with Batman and Spider-Man. You can argue all you want, but you can not PROVE one has a better fighting technique than the other.

You're kidding right?

Clay's style isn't exactly set up to go against any other style than boxing. Bruce lee's style is set up to go up against a broader range, including regular street boxing.

Boxers take alot of hits when boxing.

You really think you could just straight punch or jab a martial artist?

Originally posted by who?-kid
I DO know however who is the fastest, the strongest and the most durable (tip : he ain't wearing a cape). Now THAT's something we can not argue about.
Because once again, stats mean everything. 🙄

Originally posted by CorderaMitchell
man the most unorthodox, and unique fighting style is better
So could you take on Jet Li?

"Because once again, stats mean everything."

They are a much more reliable factor in a debate or arguement than the intangibles everyone else seems to be using.

How would you feel if you hired a lawyer and in court he said, "Yeah right, like facts mean everything." and then he rolled his eyes? You'd probably fire his ass right? After the judge and the rest of the courtroom were finished laughing their ass off.

And for the record, I think who-kid? is making a valid point.

There is no fighting style that is > every other fighting style in existence.

If you finished your post, I said that is even better with enhanced senses agility, etc, that even skilled martial artists hope to reach.

anyway are you having trouble uploading a signature pick, if you are i can help you get one up.

Originally posted by Creshosk
😆 😂 😂lol2

You just pwnd yourself dude. That was YOUR argument.

Do me a favor : read the last couple of posts, and quote me where I said such a thing. Or even implied such a thing.

Silly boy.

You're kidding right?

Clay's style isn't exactly set up to go against any other style than boxing. Bruce lee's style is set up to go up against a broader range, including regular street boxing.

Boxers take alot of hits when boxing.

You really think you could just straight punch or jab a martial artist?


Depends on the boxer and the martial artist. Duh.

Stop picking on Cresh.

Hey, that's not exactly picking 😉.

That's debating with a tiny sharp edge, nothing more. And it's not like he's an innocent sheep either.

If you're old enough to sit at the table, you're old enough to eat.
Cresh can dish it out, he has to take it as well.....

Yes I'm afraid I can't look over him much longer, he's simply picking on too many people.

Originally posted by who?-kid
Do me a favor : read the last couple of posts, and quote me where I said such a thing. Or even implied such a thing.

Originally posted by who?-kid
No he isn't. Their fighting styles are very different, you can not compare them.

Was Bruce Lee a better fighter than Cassius Clay ? Is Picasso a better painter than Vermeer ? You can argue the rest of your life about these questions, but it's no use : different styles.

You simply can not compare different styles.

Silly boy.

Originally posted by who?-kid
[B]
Depends on the boxer and the martial artist. Duh.
Obviously, but you were saying top of the top ones. But a boxing style won't really work against a martial art style is the problem. It's too rigid a form.