Batman vs Spiderman

.....................................................................................................................

..................

........................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................

................................

.................................................................................

......................................................................................................................................................

.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

sorry about that one double post......now do you understand why comparing deathstroke and spiderman is so laughable?

Some of it made sense. Breaking hawkman's harness. Tazering black canary. Ruining green arrow's arrows. But the green lantern and flash thing was lame duck.

lame duck?

anyways....I can understand the falsh thing being screwy in a very very technical sense....but at face value it makes sense.....and the GL ring works on will power man....always has...always will....if deathstroke had more willpower than GL he'd win....and that's just what was happening....

It clearly states, DS is "faster where it counts." as in a combination of relexes and timing, which is withing his character.

Yeah sure. Batman has beaten Hulk. Crossovers are complete BS. But you don't DISREGARD IT. It's happened. In that case, every time Spider-Man beats a superhero that's 10 times stronger than him is complete BS and should be disregarded too. You don't exclude things that happen. Therefore Batman defeating Superman or Hulk is comic FACT.

Spider-Man was no match for Superman during their crossover, so how could Spider-Man be a match for a simple human that managed to get the best of Clark Kent?

Batman > Superman/Hulk > Spider-Man

thank you mrheavysilence......finally someone who shares the same veiwpoint on comic facts.......DOWN WITH THE BAD WRITING ARGUMENT......cause we all know everytime spidey gets beat it's because of bad writing....bad bad writing....

Originally posted by MrHeavySilence
Yeah sure. Batman has beaten Hulk. Crossovers are complete BS. But you don't DISREGARD IT. It's happened. In that case, every time Spider-Man beats a superhero that's 10 times stronger than him is complete BS and should be disregarded too. You don't exclude things that happen. Therefore Batman defeating Superman or Hulk is comic FACT.

Spider-Man was no match for Superman during their crossover, so how could Spider-Man be a match for a simple human that managed to get the best of Clark Kent?

Batman > Superman/Hulk > Spider-Man

everytime anyone says that spiderman is gonna lose.....all the spidey fans rally up and start a bunch of hipocritical fanboy taunts....😂 goofy bastards......lol. anyways, it's making a point of batmans inhuman speed and presicion..........

Jinzin, do you you really think that if Superman and Batman all of the sudden decide to go all out that Batman would win?

In Canon Batman has NEVER beat Superman. Heck even out of canon in DKR Batman didn't beat Superman by himself.

In Hush the only canon fight Batman was almost killed by Superman who was holding back, and fighting mind control.

hell no....never said that he would either......but he has beaten superman...on multiple occasions......

it still doesn't take away from the fact that a fast flying superman got clocked in the face by batman.....

Bat had a kryptonite ring, and nearly broke his hand. And Superman wasn't flying as fast as he could cause he was holding back.

And what really could Batman do to Spidey before Spider-Man webbed him up? Or webbed him, and threw him?