Homosexuality: Chosen or Genetic?

Originally posted by StyleTime
Agreed. Even if it is a choice, it's a choice people should still be allowed to make. Everyone thinks that those who believe it's a choice are implying that the act is immoral.

And people are able to make that choice, but not every choice one makes for their "personal" lifestyle..needs to be recognized as "morally" acceptable behavior in a society.

How is homosexuality moral by the way?

I'd love to hear you explain this..

Originally posted by StyleTime
Also, I noticed that you did this as well. People limit this to whether or not homosexuality alone is chosen. All sexualities will be determined the same way and not just one orientation.

That has been stated all along. Regardless of our "enviornmental" circumstances or our "genetics" We still have the ability to make choices. Neither genetics nor environment negate these "choices"

Originally posted by StyleTime
Also agreed. Attributing the onset of homosexuality soley to some degenerate domestic conditions is quite ignorant. Especially when there is no real evidence to support this fallacious claim.

A multitude of social situations have been linked to various types of sexual behavior. "Degenerate" domestic conditions are not the sole reason behind all these behaviors, however, many times..they do play a part in an individual's overall sexual development.

Originally posted by StyleTime
It hasn't been proven either way actually. There is definitely more evidence for the genetic side but it hasn't been PROVEN yet.

Not true at all. In fact many notable professionals agree that one's sexual orientation can not be solely linked to "genetic" factors. I've provided many quotes supporting this assertion scan back a few pages.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
How is homosexuality moral by the way?

I'd love to hear you explain this..

I would love for you to explain who its not moral... Without the aid of your religion, (as that can't be proved to be correct) Please enlighten us as to why being homosexual is so wrong...

"Not true at all. In fact many notable professionals agree that one's sexual orientation can not be solely linked to "genetic" factors. I've provided many quotes supporting this assertion scan back a few pages."

I agree that one sexual orientation isn't linked entirely to genetic factors🙂 If people really do believe its all genetic never fear there will be a pill one day to cure your problem🙂

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
I would love for you to explain who its not moral...

Well I believe the word "moral" ususally represents something that is deemed to be "good"

ie the expression of "moral" character...

So should ramming a dude up the anus, pretending another dude's wanker is a popsicle, or playing a game of 'fencing" with the male anatomy be deemed as a "good" thing?

You tell me bud..😉

...let me guess your answer.."morality" is subjective..there are no absolutes...right?

If you choose that answer..please tell me how ramming a dude up the bunghole can benefit the body physically, emotionally, etc? How does it benefit society? I'd really like to know these things.

Originally posted by whobdamandog
...let me guess your answer.."morality" is subjective..there are no absolutes...right?

If you choose that answer..please tell me how ramming a dude up the bunghole can be deemed as a good thing? How does it benefit the body physically, emotionally, etc?

Only if you were gay you would understand

Homophobes and straight people alike can go on for hours and hours...but you are still wrong......

You will only understand if you are gay

Originally posted by whobdamandog
...let me guess your answer.."morality" is subjective..there are no absolutes...right?

If you choose that answer..please tell me how ramming a dude up the bunghole can be deemed as a good thing? How does it benefit the body physically, emotionally, etc?

It's not like it's a prerequisite my friend.

And yes, some men do get pleasure out of anal stimulation, so what. People get stimulated in different ways. No different then you "ramming your penis into a female", unless you were mainly doing it to reproduce, which I'd advise against.

is it comprehensible.....

Originally posted by powerfulone1987
what does this have to do with being a homosexual male...............or HOMOSEXUAL WOMAN for that matter?

Ramming a dude up the butt has nothing to do with being a homosexual male? ...rolleyes...😆

Originally posted by powerfulone1987
And yes, some men do get pleasure out of anal stimulation, so what. People get stimulated in different ways. No different then you "ramming your penis into a female"

There's quite a difference between a vagina and an a - hole my friend...I'm sure most biologists would agree..😉

Originally posted by powerfulone1987
is it comprehensible.....

No my friend..none of what you posted made any damn sense..😆

of course it wouldn't to the likes of you.

is it comprehensible.....

Originally posted by powerfulone1987
Is it comprehensible.....

No my friend..and it never will be...😉 <---This is comprehensible

Originally posted by whobdamandog
Well I believe the word "moral" ususally represents something that is deemed to be "good"

ie the expression of "moral" character...

So should ramming a dude up the anus, pretending another dude's wanker is a popsicle, or playing a game of 'fencing" with the male anatomy be deemed as a "good" thing?

You tell me bud..😉

Moral now that tends to incline that being gay is wrong and evil...

I don't think gays are wrong, and I don't think there evil... between 2 consenting adults, They don't seem to be hurting anyone?? so wheres the wrong?? no ones being hurt...

Why must you use such vulgar language when describing gay sex???

Originally posted by whobdamandog
If you choose that answer..please tell me how ramming a dude up the bunghole can benefit the body physically, emotionally, etc? How does it benefit society? I'd really like to know these things.

I'll propose the same counter as the other thread...
Please explain why god "intelligently designed" the prostate gland, with the ability to have orgasms...

"Stimulation of the prostate gland in males has been compared to stimulation of the Gräfenberg spot in females in that prostate stimulation can result in a more powerful orgasm. Stimulation of the prostate gland can be accomplished through anal sex and anal masturbation."

Now this "body benefit" serves no purpose unless you are gay... Seeing as heterosexual sex can never stimulate the prostate gland....

If it causes half of society to be happy then let them be happy... theres loads of things in society that serve no purpose other then for our amusement...

Originally posted by whobdamandog
...let me guess your answer.."morality" is subjective..there are no absolutes...right?

If you choose that answer..please tell me how ramming a dude up the bunghole can benefit the body physically, emotionally, etc? How does it benefit society? I'd really like to know these things.

It feels good for both parties. That counts.

Men having sex with each other doesn't affect your life in any way, shape or form. So why worry about it, and say it's wrong, when it doesn't affect you in the slightest?

Don't forget that women sometimes engage in anal sex, too.

Also, is it wrong for a woman to have sex with another woman? With two men, they have anal sex, which may not be natural, but if they want to do it, fine with me.

Women can stimulate each other with their fingers. A man can do the same to a woman. A woman can give oral sex to another woman. A man can give oral sex to a woman.

So it can't be wrong for women to have sex with each other, because they are not doing anything that they wouldn't do with a guy. 😉

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Moral now that tends to incline that being gay is wrong and evil...

I don't think gays are wrong, and I don't think there evil... between 2 consenting adults, They don't seem to be hurting anyone?? so wheres the wrong?? no ones being hurt...

Why must you use such vulgar language when describing gay sex???

I'll propose the same counter as the other thread...
Please explain why god "intelligently designed" the prostate gland, with the ability to have orgasms...

"Stimulation of the prostate gland in males has been compared to stimulation of the Gräfenberg spot in females in that prostate stimulation can result in a more powerful orgasm. Stimulation of the prostate gland can be accomplished through anal sex and anal masturbation."

Now this "body benefit" serves no purpose unless you are gay... Seeing as heterosexual sex can never stimulate the prostate gland....

If it causes half of society to be happy then let them be happy... theres loads of things in society that serve no purpose other then for our amusement...

Also, some heterosexual men even get their wives to stimulate their prostate for them.

And I'm still clueless as to why whenever whobdamandog comments on this subject, he's talking about anal sex.

Being a homosexual is so much more than that.

Maybe the fact that he can't get pass that means that he has some subconscious issues with it.

Also, I don't hear whobadamandog saying anything about man and woman anal sex. Is that okay b/c it's a man and a woman?

And you're so focused on Male and Male relationships.
What about Female relationships.

So you see, you're not really making sense with your senselessness.

is it comprehensible.....

I think people should stop complaining about something that doesn't affect them. If people want to **** their arses, go right ahead, I don't care, because at least someone's getting some!

Originally posted by Makedde
With two men, they have anal sex, which may not be natural, but if they want to do it, fine with me.

is it comprehensible.....

Originally posted by powerfulone1987
why is it so unnatural?

Because the anus wasn't designed to be used that way. I agree with that, because it is true. But just because it wasn't desgned for that, doesn't make anal sex unnatural.

Originally posted by Makedde
It feels good for both parties. That counts.

Feeling good...does not equate to being good for you.

I may want to eat Ice cream for the rest of my life because it "feels good", but obviously there are various "health" problems that I would incur from such a diet, so I choose not to do it.

If I stick my wanker in a dog's butt..it might feel good, but obviously..it wouldn't be the right thing to do, and could cause harm to the animal..as well as to myself.

That's what seperates man from beast people..we can control our urges..even though we have these impulses to do things that "feel good", It doesn't mean we have to act on them.

Originally posted by Makedde
Men having sex with each other doesn't affect your life in any way, shape or form. So why worry about it, and say it's wrong, when it doesn't affect you in the slightest?

You are correct it doesn't, however, when they attempt to legalize it as being "acceptable" and "normal" behavior..it does affect my life in many ways. Regardless..as it has been stated to you all many times..the topic of this thread is not "Should Homosexuals be able to get married" it is "Homosexuality..Chosen or Genetic." Try to stay on topic.

Originally posted by Makedde
Don't forget that women sometimes engage in anal sex, too.

And this makes anal sex any more natural or any less of a choice how so? Let's skip all the BS sweety..that was a rhetorical question..obviously it doesn't..

Originally posted by Makedde
Also, is it wrong for a woman to have sex with another woman?

Of course it is. It's a bit harder for them to have intercourse though. I've never understood the point of a woman using a fake dildo on another woman..I mean..I thought she was supposed to not be into penis and all. Isn't it a bit hypocritical to call oneself a lesbian..and then be attracted to a plastic replica of the male genitalia?

Originally posted by Makedde
With two men, they have anal sex, which may not be natural, but if they want to do it, fine with me.

Fine with me. As long as they keep it to themselves...and don't try to get the government to legalize their behavior, or try to force a society into deeming it as an "acceptable" alternative to heterosexuality.

Originally posted by Makedde
Women can stimulate each other with their fingers. A man can do the same to a woman. A woman can give oral sex to another woman. A man can give oral sex to a woman.

Sure they can..doesn't make any of that stuff natural though..

Originally posted by Makedde
So it can't be wrong for women to have sex with each other, because they are not doing anything that they wouldn't do with a guy. 😉

Well they can't do everything a guy and girl can do..because they don't have the same sexual organs as a male..but if they choose to use plastic replicas of male sex organs..wouldn't it just make more sense to go for the real thing? 😕 😆

Where is your proof to say that it is not natural?

Originally posted by powerfulone1987
why is it so unnatural?

is it comprehensible.....

Get an 8 inch banana and try sticking it up your ass..

Then you tell me whether or not sticking a banana up your ass is a "natural" thing to do..

Is it comprehensible...🙄...😆