"You wanna throw out all "bad writing" examples, fine.
You wanna go by everything that has happened in comics, regardless
of "writing," fine by me."
Like I said stan lee wrote the story for that example and a few of the others i used, I would think his "writing" would be the law and the letter,,,,,or should at least be good guidlines to follow.
You wanna call stan lee a bad writer? shame on you.
so what if spider-man beat a herald of galactus, Wolverine almost got the drop on galactus himself, but because he only had bone claws at the time his attack was feudal.
Ummmm wolverine beat a guy who knew what wolverine's moves were gonna be before he even made em, I'm pretty sure in an all out fight, he would be an iincredibly tough foe for spiderman to fight much less beat.
There are claims that we disregard spiderman's feats, and yet when we bring up how wolverine has fought spidey to a stalemate, and how DD has given spidey serious trouble, and how DD did dance circles around venom (who beats on spidey's ass regularly) all we get is the bad writing excuse. How about the fact that wolverine has almost killed hulk before, how about the fact that the cap downed namor,,,,,,see the list could and does go on and on and on for any one of these for respective characters.
When we brought up the fact that captain america can strategize and calculate where spidey will be before he gets there and can sheild sling the webhead in the face off of a bankshot,,,all we got was a "no he can't" argument when this is something that Captain America regularly does.
Don't tell me that we're simply disregarding spidermans feats (cause like i said i've seem em, I've been impressed, I've seen some more,) esp. when team spidey does the same exact thing to us. Against all three of these guys, spiderman is gonna lose.