"Cap isn't overrated? I didn't belittle it, Cap IS overrated. Don't make me look like the bad guy here when you're the one who keeps coming back constantly after being proven wrong. You said it yourself, the guy had 5-7 comics with not a "jewel" in the bunch...and yet, he's still too popular for Spidey to overcome? "
please don't be ludicrous, you haven't proven me wrong in the least except with your opinion of how this fight would turn out. As far as I know you can't PROVE someone wrong with opinions. lol.....ridiculous.
and you're obviously misreading my posts again, Spiderman's the one who has 5 to 7 ongoing titles at any given time. plus a plethora of one shots and what have you, he faaaaar outweighs the "overused" factor when compared to any of these other three (and given wolverine's ridiculous amounts of guest appearances per month, that's saying alot.) so please don't try to discard cap's flooring of spidey as a simple popularity contest. Especially when it happened in spiderman's own friggin comic.
"When it was you who brought Spidey fighting guy who took over the world and gave it away when he was bored with it (Doom) just to find a scenario where Spidey was so "easily" defeated?"
Yeah, this happened to be in a fist fight though, it's not like doc. doom takes over the world using his brute force alone, which is hat you're implying,,,,,,once again your reply is riddled with logical falacies.
"And you dare call me pathetic? After I explained to you just how powerful Spidey was compared to the peak humans, and that the methods and ways in which they beat Spidey (which they shouldn't do in the first place) where redicoulous? Not to mention how others as well as I have explained how Spidey vs. Cap, Spidey vs. Wolvie, and Spidey vs. DD are almost non-fights from a vital standpoint. Looks like you need to checkup on your logic....hypocrite."
once again, your entire argument is based on us the readers forgetting about every showing that a street-level has showed against spidey simply because you disagree with it, not really much of an argument at all.
and non fights? please anything that ends in a draw where both characters are at a lethal stalemate, is anything but a nonfight.
"And your snippy little comment about how I used the crap writing argument, you could prove my other statement wrong by calling it crap writing, just proves you're desperation to get one of your stupid claims across. Yes, I did use the crap writing argument (not primarily) and I say this with pride because unlike you jinzin, I can admit when something's crap writing, like, I never said that Spidey would mutilate Superman, he'd be murdered. But as for these guys, they aren't Supermen, they aren't even superhumans period. And going up against a superhuman, especially one as uniquely set with his powers as Spidey, they don't have much of a chance."
And yet even more assumptions from you about my character. I've admitted to crap writting all the freaking time, the actuall diff between me and you is that I don't discard a comic book occurance based on the writing not being all that great, if I were to do that,,,,,well we all know how many super heroes simply wouldn't even exist i we are to stay to the confines of reality, spider-man for instance. To simply disregard comic book occurances becasue you don't agree with them is stupid, it's a contradiction to why people read super hero comic books, in a world of very lax physical and logical principles. Is it great writing to say that a radio-active pider bite causes super-human abilities in a person? pffffft I think not, it's hardly award winning material, because this simply can't happen, so under that same argument I could very well argue that spiderman doesn't exist according to the "crap writing argument". However, i digress.
cosmo kramer, you've said everything i no longer need to reidderate,,,,thank you.