Halo 3

Started by Superboy Prime200 pages

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
The main reason it is so praised in general, not "What do a couple of people think?".

I'm not saying the contrary isn't possible. If you like Halo, if you enjoy it, go for it, have fun and have a blast. I love Gears online, a lot do not. Way of the world.

I just have a distaste for misplaced credit and hysteria.

-AC

I loved GOW's online multiplayer. But then I got every achievement and I somewhat slowed down. Then I decided not to pay for the new maps...and it died for me. Needless to say Gears of War's online is fun. And I could care less if people either prefer GOW or Halo...fact of the matter is I get to play both on my Xbox 360. Its a win win situation to me w00t Oh yeah...not to mention Bioshock...and Mass Effect and...*stops*

I still don't have an XBOX360 and my Wii died.🙁

Really my 360 just got the Ring of Death.

Is Sargent Johnson unkillable in this game too? XD

Originally posted by Superboy Prime
Undeniably multiplayer?

I loved Halo before I even played on Xbox live. I just constantly played Campaign over and over again because it was, and still is a lot of fun. I know a lot of people who are like that too.

But meh say what you will.

Yeah the reason I was in love with halo was because of the campaign... not the multiplayer. IMO Halo's campaign is the best part of the game and the multiplayer is just an added bonus. In fact last Saturday I had some friends over and we played the original until 4 am lol

Oh... and I just spent about 2 hours playing the forge and it is AWESOME. Me and beowulf on this forum were trying to make an infection game type on High ground and the possibilities were endless. We stuck a grav lift on accident underneath the hatch in the bunker and it works perfectly for keeping the "zombies" out. Then we started barricading the entrances and windows and put teleporters and explosives everywhere... its a great addition to the game. And at the end we just started making weapons appear and beat the shit out of each other with them and launched scorpion tanks across the map. Go Bungie!

I'm really wanting to play this game.

Originally posted by Skeets
I beat the campaign a few minutes ago with 3 friends.
It was pretty weak.Halo 2's campaign was much better.

🤨 what makes you think so?

Halo 3 blew the shit out of the second one IMO

I also think the campaign is better than the previous ones.

One reason is that level design is alot better than the other two Halo's.

Each level is generally different than the next.

Originally posted by ESB -1138
Really my 360 just got the Ring of Death.

Damn that sucks. I'm still waiting for mine. The good thing is it'll be new and I'll have plenty of Halo time before it breaks.
Originally posted by Smasandian
I also think the campaign is better than the previous ones.

One reason is that level design is alot better than the other two Halo's.

Each level is generally different than the next.


Awesome. I've heard a lot of good things about the first level in the jungle. Sounds a lot better than the previous ones, only downer is the endings been ruined for me already lol.

Originally posted by shin_gear
Is Sargent Johnson unkillable in this game too? XD

Originally posted by Lana
Because I decide what I think is worth telling someone off about, and calling someone a fool isn't.

And you are trolling. You admitted it by saying you wonder if that's going to instigate AC. Not only that but you are disrupting the thread. So knock it off.

So, this must explain why you told me to "Cut out the namecalling RIGHT DAMN NOW!!1" when I told one of your closest friends they were making a fool of themselves in one topic, correct?

And, how's it a trolling post despite it mentioning Halo 3?

Anybody wanna start some custom matches?
I'm on with 2 friends at the moment.

Shoot...anyone still playing Halo 2? 🙁

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
We're not talking about overall hype, we're talking about the main reason the franchise is praised, which is undeniably multiplayer.

-AC


Actually, AC, most of the people in real life I know play Halo for the campaign. I play multiplayer maybe 5% of the time I do on campaign. To them and I multiplayer is simply an added bonus. Personally it was the books that got me into it. The multiplayer is strong, but so is the campaign. Editors talk about multiplayer because they like interactivity with others, and in this case, quite possibly because the multiplayer beta testing for Halo 3 came out a few months prior to launch. Try not to be so quick to jump to presumptions, this isn't simply what a "couple of people" think, despite your perception of things.

Do you think people got Halo 3 more for the multiplayer, or cause they wanted to find out how the series would end in terms of the plot? How they would 'finish the fight', in Bungie's terms?

Precisely.

Everyone who's bought it that I can talk to in Uni classes have been raving about the Campaign mode, not the Multiplayer. More than one head has been smacked for spoiling it.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
No, it's quite clearly Xbox live, with its millions of members interacting with each other. That's the phenomenon, that's what gets praised, not dragging four controllers or another Xbox around to your friend's house.

-AC


It's a matter of opinion, AC, it isn't a factual matter. Xbox Live is just an option, so is system link, split screen, etc. Yes, multiplayer is indeed a general overview, it doesn't point straight to Live.

Have you not heard of a LAN party? Drinks? Partying? Yelling and backslapping? It can be just as fun as Live sometimes, even better in some aspects. Thinking of it as a chore, which you seemingly described it as, is a rather limited and shortsighted way to see it as.

Shin, you reported me for calling someone a fool, and everyone calls anyone "fool". That's why.

Originally posted by DarkC
Actually, AC, most of the people in real life I know play Halo for the campaign. I play multiplayer maybe 5% of the time I do on campaign. To them and I multiplayer is simply an added bonus. Personally it was the books that got me into it. The multiplayer is strong, but so is the campaign. Editors talk about multiplayer because they like interactivity with others, and in this case, quite possibly because the multiplayer beta testing for Halo 3 came out a few months prior to launch. Try not to be so quick to jump to presumptions, this isn't simply what a "couple of people" think, despite your perception of things.

It's certainly not as many compared to the amount that praise it for multiplayer, which is why the boom started and which is the main reason the game is praised by fans a lot. Because they discuss it and play each other.

Using personal experience is irrelevant, because the multiplayer has been Halo's most successful part since Halo 2, two out of three games in the franchise since it was available. It's the most praised part.

Originally posted by DarkC
Do you think people got Halo 3 more for the multiplayer, or cause they wanted to find out how the series would end in terms of the plot? How they would 'finish the fight', in Bungie's terms?

If we're to assume most people buying it have live, then I'll say multiplayer. Again, it's praised for a reason and the boom happened because of the interaction. I'm not denying the game itself isn't praised, it is, hugely, but not in comparison to the multiplayer. Even in this thread a lot of people have said "The game's not that different...but the multiplayer is amazing this time. Cos of this, this and this.".

Originally posted by DarkC
Precisely.

Don't be quick to jump to assumptions.

Originally posted by DarkC
Everyone who's bought it that I can talk to in Uni classes have been raving about the Campaign mode, not the Multiplayer. More than one head has been smacked for spoiling it.

So? Your university is not the world and among the net, it's more praised for its multiplayer. That is why it has rose in popularity.

Scenario: Live doesn't exist, is Halo as popular? Any other answer besides "No" is naivety of monumental proportions.

Originally posted by DarkC
It's a matter of opinion, AC, it isn't a factual matter. Xbox Live is just an option, so is system link, split screen, etc. Yes, multiplayer is indeed a general overview, it doesn't point straight to Live.

It's not if you have sense. Halo's multiplayer hasn't been skyrocketing in popularity since Halo 2 because people love dragging Xboxes and TVs to their buddies' houses entirely, it's live. I'm not saying it's JUST live, people may obviously have enjoyed it first, and did, but multiplayer, now in this time, is what Halo is known for and praised for more, or very arguably as much, as the reason it exists. As if it was Bungie's doing to invent internet multiplayer.

Originally posted by DarkC
Have you not heard of a LAN party? Drinks? Partying? Yelling and backslapping? It can be just as fun as Live sometimes, even better in some aspects. Thinking of it as a chore, which you seemingly described it as, is a rather limited and shortsighted way to see it as.

Try understanding my points first.

I never said people didn't enjoy doing that or didn't do it at all, I said when you want to discuss why Halo's multiplayer is as praised as it has become, you're naive if you think it's because of system link.

It's through live.

-AC

Finished the campaign.

I hate to admit but I actually really enjoyed it. The story is pretty good, and the action is intense.

I still hate the Flood though.

Level 8 was shit, yeah?

I hated that level.

Really enjoyed the rest, though.

'Technically' better is a red herring for a final reading of graphics quality. Tech specs cannot tell you anything about implementation and are also useless for analysing areas such as animation and texture detail. Oblivion has a better tech behind it than Twilight Princess, but the latter actually has better use of graphics and is a more visually pleasing game.

That's an opinion, of course, and so it always is with graphics.

Meanwhile, I will re-iterate once more that there is no way you can clock Halo 3 for being very similar to Halo 2 without holding the same criticism of Bioshock. Most importantly in any case, it does not matter- sequels do not HAVE to be massively innovative to be any good.

Nobody said sequels have to be massively innovative to be any good or saying graphics being technically good and graphics being visually pleasing are one and the same always.

I certainly wasn't saying that, or that Halo isn't fun to anybody because it isn't pushing boundaries.

-AC

Didn't say you did say it. Still important points to bear in mind.

Originally posted by Violent2Dope
I still don't have an XBOX360 and my Wii died.🙁

So...just get a 360 and there's always cialis for your E.D.

Problem solved.