Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Originally posted by Ushgarak
Well, Bioshock spent much longer than that in development and didn't add a heck of a lot more.
Do you not agree that it did come out a much better game, in your opinion? Whether it added a lot more, not a lot more (Still more) or nothing more is not really the issue, I don't think so anyway.
I believe...sorry, the company name eludes me, but whoever it was, didn't spend enough to feed most African nations on that game (Bioshock), whereas people are just pointing out that Halo 3's overall $50 million budget should have been more focused on Bungie making a better game for a THIRD in the series, than getting Master Chief on Mountain Dew cans and lunchboxes.
Originally posted by Menetnashté
It's the best game I've played this year...bioshock bored me. I played for about an hour and a half at my friends before I got bored. Besides your powers it was pretty lame, and you have to rely so damn much on respawn...felt to repetitive, though the first boss was pretty cool and so were the big brother's. Even though they were for the most part all the same, at least what I saw.
Whilst I don't believe you should be berated for having the personal opinion that Halo 3 is game of the year, as it's your right, you should at least play Bioshock or pay attention to a game you are dissing.
I don't like Halo, but I at least know enough to form judgement.
Originally posted by Spartan005
Halo 3 deserves the game of the year award over bioshock IMO. I will admit that I haven't beaten the game yet but after I have I highly doubt my decision will change. Sure its a great game... and theirs pretty much nothing wrong with it but the only thing it has is singleplayer.
Your name is Spartan005, you have Master Chief all over your KMC identity, so be honest; Halo 3 was going to be game of the year to you no matter what year it was released, wasn't it? That's you opinion and you have a right to it, but don't act like you're some impartial fan who gave any other game a look in.
-AC