Originally posted by General G
As much as I enjoyed GOW's campaign, I like Halo's more, hard to figure out for me, I thought Halo's was much more intense.
Agreed.
GoW was in-your-face action because of the close environments...but in Halo it can get so intense when you have Wraiths, Banshees, Grunts in Turrets, Choppers and even snipers to worry about all at the same time in an open field. If that does not describe intense I don't know what will.
Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
I have, and I have been destroyed. I already know for a fact that playing lone wolf gets you killed against MLG's, but honestly 90% of the time you're just playing some random joe on LIVE, not an MLG with his buddies, so you don't have to worry about it. Though yesterday I played against four bungie guys who helped build Halo 3's matchmaking system.. I kicked there asses in team objective.And before anyone says anything.. I don't like the lonewolf mentality. I'm a team player, which is why I prefer GOW's multiplayer to Halo's.
I just got too used to playing Hardcore on Halo 2--which is the MLG equivalent in matchmaking. I played against a team of bungie employees last night. They had the fancy recon helmet and it was VIP on the Pit. I was totally ripping them a new one. Then their VIP spawned in the second floor room in the base(you know...the room you don't have any access to unless you spawn there) He camped there for over 8 minutes. Our VIP died...we lost. Cheap ass mother ****ers.
Originally posted by Superboy Prime
I just got too used to playing Hardcore on Halo 2--which is the MLG equivalent in matchmaking. I played against a team of bungie employees last night. They had the fancy recon helmet and it was VIP on the Pit. I was totally ripping them a new one. Then their VIP spawned in the second floor room in the base(you know...the room you don't have any access to unless you spawn there) He camped there for over 8 minutes. Our VIP died...we lost. Cheap ass mother ****ers.
😆 😆 😆 😆 PWNED!!
Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
I actually meant "they" as in the industry.. since 60 fps is standard these days...as for 30fps.. thats quite a bit of interesting info... do you have a source?
Compare it to Call of Duty 4, which runs at 60 fps.
Most games on the 360 run at 30 fps. Bioshock, GOW, R6:Vegas, Ghost Recond, Oblivion, Orange Box
Originally posted by BackFire
Yeah, it's still perfectly playable at 30 fps.But man, after playing COD4, which runs at 60, and going back to playing Halo 3 or something, it's really noticeable. You don't realize it until you get used to 60 fps and then try and go back to 30.
Yeah, definitly.
Look at Madden 08 comparision video between the 360 and PS3 version.
Very noticeable.
I just wanted to say that a while ago I bought Halo, just to see what all the fuzz was about. I played the singleplayer campaign for an hour or two, got bored to death and gave up the game, and deemed the series overrated by a billion times. However this week, I finally got a chance at trying the multiplayer parts of Halo, Co-op campaign and Deathmatch, the quality of the game increased tenfolds, so I might give the games another chance. However, would it be stupid to jump straight to Halo 3? Must I play through the other two first to understand the plot etc, or is it independent enough?