That's true, Who Kid.
Batman is by far the most interesting and complex character. His creator's obviously spent more time on him, because they wanted him to be gritty and realistic. Dark and mean.
He's bound to win in a comic situation because he's the underdog.
But realistically, Supes has a million and one ways to kick the dark night into the next century...
I really love Batman, I always found him cool.
But it gets on my nerves when people say Superman is dumb because he's too powerful and not realistic and that they can relate to Batman, because "he's so human.
The only thing human about him is his body. But he's an incredible rich playboy with a dedicated butler, respected by the law (most of times), he lives in a gigantic mansion with a cool cave beneath it and rides a futuristic car. I also suspect he has some kind of healing factor, because despite all the punches and bullets he took, he still dances on the rooftops.
Yep, Superman is not realistic, I really can relate to Batman 😉.
Originally posted by nigel45
Well, how? What strategy can Batman use when Superman is going to be all over him in less than a second?
If he did, then say bye bye to Supes! With no powers, he is a goner!
Again, Batman is a detective, a super intellect man. He is not going to be in a situation that is going to allow Superman to kill him in a second!
that scenario would only happend if Batman goes without the any Kryptonite
If it was a random freak unplanned event, then I'm afraid that Batman would get creamed even before he has a chance to THINK about any strategies to employ. His only weakness in this fight would be his sense of morality - I think Bats is a little more unscrupulous, shall we say, lol.
In a planned battle, both of them would prepare, not just Bats. But being a trusting guy, I don't think that Supes would have an extensive list of weaknesses writting up about Bats....
Originally posted by nigel45
I think you quoted the wrong part of my post, cause your response didn't make any sense, at least not to me. And your arguement is that Batman wouldn't get into a situation where Superman could beat him, but that's the whole idea! These two are thrown into a situation, they don't get to choose it.
if you are throwing Batman with no prep time then ofcourse Supermans. He should win. That is not the question.
If Batman comes with Prep time you can just forget about that scenario of you having Batman destroy by Superman in seconds is out of the question!!!
Im sorry but you are dead wrong cause there are so many ways that villians have tried to get rid of Supermans powers such as the kryptonite or blocking the yellow sun rays and putting on a red sun rays which Superman cannot gets his powers.
I love Superman but with prep time and the weaknesses that has been shown to have, Batman has a good chance at winning.
I mention one instance already where Batman was giving powers to bring Back Superman back to normal by some She-Devil.
I can understand him winning against the Hulk which is far cry. I still cannot believe they let that happend but they did
Originally posted by Draco69
Batman never defeated Wonder Woman (unless you count Ra Ghul plan). Batman attacked her at the embassy. She kicked him out. Batman attacked her again by the dam. He did manage to smack her into a wall but WW stopped holding back and beat him down. The cover says it all for what happened next.
nah, i heard someone mention it! What happend next???
Originally posted by x_danny_x
nah, i heard someone mention it! What happend next???
Nothing important. The entire story revolved an ancient rite called the Hiketia. It's an oath that a person must fulfill. The oath decrees that a person (supplicant) becomes somewhat of a servant for another person (the supplicated). The supplicated must take care of the supplicant. And the supplicant must serve the supplicated. If either one of the persons disobey the oath. They get evisecerated by the Harpies. Wonder Woman (with her luck) got Hiketia'ed by a female murderer who killed these pimps because they made her sister a junkie and a prostitute. Batman tracked her down but she somehow escaped. The female murderer invoked the oath on WW and now she had to protect the female unless she wanted to be torn to pieces. Batman was completely ignorant of the oath at first and wanted to bring the female to the police. WW said no. Batman foolishly punched WW in the stomach. WW kicked his a$$ out of her house. Batman eventually figured the oath out. But by then it was too late. The female murderer killed herself to free Diana from the wrath of the Harpies.
Well, screw all the Batman/Wonder-Woman talk...
I say give Batman preptime(a kryptonite ring and matching thong), give Superman preptime(a antikryptonite suit)...now who will win??
Yeah Batman is "known" for being well-prepared for each and every battle BUT Superman has been known to take preparations when facing a foe of great stature...It's only fair...
Originally posted by x_danny_x
hmmmm are you saying that Superman has the same intelligence level as Batman?????????????
Well even if Superman is NOT as intelligent as Batman, that doesn't make him an idiot. I would think that Batman has him beat in cleverness and ruthlessness for sure, but they're both intelligent, and I don't know if Batman is significantly MORE intelligent, but he has other mental attributes that are probably superior to Superman.