Originally posted by Darth_Nefarus
I agree Maul has talent, but I think Sidious or Yoda is the best with a saber. Besides, you admitted earlier that Maul is Sidious' underling and did lose to him.
Don't make me bring up the prophecy lol
Yoda and Sidious wouldnt be good with lightsabers if they didnt have the force to guide them and keep them strong.......theyre bodies are fragile,all im saying is that WITHOUT THE FORCE Maul is best with a lightsaber.
He's a Maul fan, and his personal bias shows in his avatar, pic, and his words. I really don't find any reason more to listen to him. He has little nice or constructive to say, and he has yet to persuade me of anything.
As for three minutes, that's a disgrace as well. Do try and realize that Vader is a fallible creature like the rest. If he was infallible, there would be no episodes four thru six, because Obi Wan wouldn't have won.
And also, without the Force, people are most likely to lop off limbs. The Force is what makes a lightsaber a Jedi's trademark weapon. Only with its subtle flows and guidance can a Jedi master the weapon without killing himself or harming himself. Without the Force, Maul's a Zabrak with a potential saberwound in the making.
Originally posted by Darth_Nefarus
and how can this be proven?
couldn't you argue Anakin or Obi-Wan could be better? they're not fragile or old
you're missing the point.....they are better. do you think that if yoda didnt use the force, and never had it, that he could do all those flips and live for that long? if none of them ever had the force, Maul is the best with a saber.
my personal bias is me speaking the truth....janus you can do me a favor and never talk down towards, or about me ever again, ever. im here about the facts, if maul was matched up against sumone he couldnt beat, i would admit it. i just happen to like him, doesnt make him the best. so dont try and say things about me that arent true, got it?