Darth Malak Vs Luke Skywalker(ROTJ)

Who's badder Luke or the betrayer(from afar)

Well, Malak can destroy most Jedi knights, and Luke is a barely trained padawan (despite his potential, before you prophecy spouters go off on a tangent) so he would definately get owned.

I agree, Malak whoops Luke in an instant. No contest.

i guess maybe malak........naah, NJO Luke for sure would eat him for brunch.

NJO Luke>Malak
Malak>ROTJ Luke

i suppose so

Malak

Malak would own Lukes ass, i mean i dunno why every1 is considering Luke so great. he barely defeated vader, he has almost no knowledge of the force(only powers i saw him use are push and mind trick) so defiantly Malak

luke all the way!!!!!!

Luke all the way? For what reasons? This isn't a ball game. You just don't shout a team go cry and hope for the best. Let's see some logic behind Luke winning this battle.

3 people voted for Luke? I bet my ass none of those people knows who Malak is.

i voted for malak

And a tie. What's the tie? Malak convinces Luke he sucks and they go play Pazaak or something? Nuts, I say...

hahahaha

i voted luke
and i know WHO is malak

You know who Malak is, you mean.

And Luke would have no chance with Malak. Keep in mind that ROTJ means Return of the Jedi, not Really Omnipotent Teenaged Jerk.

i don't want to argue with you
but i have my reasons i mean luke in the ROTJ
took out vader
and i believe vader is better then malak
that is my reason

vader is better than malak, but he was also better than luke, his loss against him ddint have anything to do with who was better.

yes but luke at full potential would" eat him for brunch."
so that is my reason and i have right to do that?or not?

Well, here's my offer... take it or leave it.

I'm just asking (note-asking... I'm not pressuring) a reasonable argument as to why A) Luke in ROTJ is better than Malak, an ancient Sith lord in the golden Era of the sith. And B) Old creaky mecha-Vader is, too.

full potential yes, but he wasnt full potention in ROTJ.