Child pornography

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
Why is it acceptable to you that one minor, i.e. a 15 year old engage in sexual behavior on film, but not another, i.e. a 12 year old? Either it is wrong for minors to perform in adult films or it is not.

I didn't mean to state a specific age....if i did do so, i apologize.

Every child/teenager is different, and matures differently. However, seeing as there is an 18 year old age limit to perform in porn, i dont see the harm in lowering that age to 14.....if you're going to lower it at all.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
You actually have a really good point there Bardock, and the funny thing is that few people hardly ever think of it that way.

It's absurd that we can kill, eat, and torture an animal (atleast in Spain you can)...but you can't have sex with one...

Since when is sex the worst thing you can do to something ?

Funnily enough our views on paedophilia and apparently also bestiality seem to be pretty similar, don't look at me, I am surprised too.

Originally posted by Robtard
But where do those pictures/movies come from? A child is still being harmed in trying to do damage control.

Go back and read my point. You will never stop kids getting harmed, so instead of trying to achieve the impossible, try limiting the damage of the inevitable.

Would you rather have a man jerk off to child porn and never hurt a kid, or have a man go out and kidnap a kid to satisfy his urges?

"They're both as bad!" is not an acceptable answer, as they are not.

-AC

Originally posted by Bardock42
Funnily enough our views on paedophilia and apparently also bestiality seem to be pretty similar, don't look at me, I am surprised too.

Hmm.....go figure.....

Although both peadophilia and bestiality gross me out, I don't see that as means to treat them as crimes.

Now the term "peadophilia" is used so lightly, that they consider a 24 year old having sex with a 17 year old "statuatory rape" and that's ****ing rediculous....

To me, TRUE peadophilia is a grown adult having sex with a "real" child, like ages 10 and under....(sexual peaks vary, im using 10 as a generalization)...and then its wrong, because a child with no sexual drive cannot give consent to sex.

RAPE is wrong....having sex too young is not. ❌

As for Bestiality....I'm not crazy about that. An animal cannot give permission, they can only respond, and we can only translate there response to our favor. However, It's rediculous that we protect animals from "sexual abuse", but we don't protect them from being hunted, killed, tortured, and eaten.

If someone wants to protect animals, then they should protect them all the way, not just in "some cases"

OK so we have covered Child Porn & Animals, now can we cover Furniture ?

I mean I would object to these scandalous pictures on the net:

and..

would you not ?

i mean ...........

Originally posted by GCG
i mean ...........

droolio o0o0o0o babyyyy

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Well it's not more a pipedream than assuming child pornography will be erased.

Paedophilia will always exist.

-AC

i know, but think that theres more chance that all pedophiles will stop entirely than they will all be able to keep themselves happy with pitcures and videos and not molest a child. It'd be like giving a junkie Trainspotting and saying "There we go, they can see it, they wont need to do it."

Originally posted by tabby999
i know, but think that theres more chance that all pedophiles will stop entirely than they will all be able to keep themselves happy with pitcures and videos and not molest a child. It'd be like giving a junkie Trainspotting and saying "There we go, they can see it, they wont need to do it."

I'm not saying they will all keep themselves happy with pics, I'm saying that since child porn will always exist, I'd rather a paedophile sit at home jerking off to it than going out harming kids.

You can't get rid of attraction to kids, or child pornographers, so we might as well be thankful for the fact that there are some people out there who won't over step the boundary into actual rape and murder.

-AC

Originally posted by tabby999
i know, but think that theres more chance that all pedophiles will stop entirely than they will all be able to keep themselves happy with pitcures and videos and not molest a child. It'd be like giving a junkie Trainspotting and saying "There we go, they can see it, they wont need to do it."

I don't think there's a true solution. I don't think pictures of naked children should be thrown into the internet just to "satisfy" peadophiles. That's rediculous.

It's different if there were 14 and 15 year olds who wanted to take pics of themselves, and advertize thier nudity, or w/e, but for a younger child who has no real concept of sex...to make them take naked pics of themselves just to satisfy a bunch of old pervs ? ❌

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
I don't think there's a true solution. I don't think pictures of naked children should be thrown into the internet just to "satisfy" peadophiles. That's rediculous.

It's different if there were 14 and 15 year olds who wanted to take pics of themselves, and advertize thier nudity, or w/e, but for a younger child who has no real concept of sex...to make them take naked pics of themselves just to satisfy a bunch of old pervs ? ❌

Who's implying all this bs? I swear someone took my meaning and put it into a game of Chinese whispers.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Who's implying all this bs? I swear someone took my meaning and put it into a game of Chinese whispers.

-AC

You stated it's pointless to try to limit or stop Child pornography. I disagree. 👇

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
You stated it's pointless to try to limit or stop Child pornography. I disagree. 👇

What the hell are you on about?

First of all, I never said it's pointless to try to limit child porn or stop it where you can. I said it's pointless to work toward the extinction of it, because it won't happen.

Secondly; my whole point was limitation. It's going to happen, so let's be thankful that not everyone who watches child porn is necessarily a child rapist.

I hate it when people join message boards and don't read the messages.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
What the hell are you on about?

First of all, I never said it's pointless to try to limit child porn or stop it where you can. I said it's pointless to work toward the extinction of it, because it won't happen.

Secondly; my whole point was limitation. It's going to happen, so let's be thankful that not everyone who watches child porn is necessarily a child rapist.

I hate it when people join message boards and don't read the messages.

-AC

Ok

A quick KMC recap:

Step one: I post.

Step two, and here's where many people get lost: You READ it. Read it ten times if necessary.

Step three: You reply accordingly or you ask for clarification.

Hopefully we can avoid such misunderstandings in future.

-AC

Can you send me a voice message reading it to me. Reading is SUCH a chore.

Piss off, you rotund demon.

I'm joking, I don't mean at least half of that.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Go back and read my point. You will never stop kids getting harmed, so instead of trying to achieve the impossible, try limiting the damage of the inevitable.

Would you rather have a man jerk off to child porn and never hurt a kid, or have a man go out and kidnap a kid to satisfy his urges?

"They're both as bad!" is not an acceptable answer, as they are not.

-AC

They are both just as bad, one scenario you have a mad jerking off to pictures of a kid that was raped on the other you have him doing it himself to satisfy his urges. A child was raped either scenario.

I understand and can sympathize in part with your view of having one child being raped in hopes of appeasing 50 would be rapist, but I do not think it is the answer. There can be no even ground on this and allowing it in some instances could open a pathway for more.

Sadly, you're probably right, sickos preying on children will always exist in society, but so will murder, rape and torture and who wants to make concession to make those more acceptable?

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
A quick KMC recap:

Step one: I post.

Step two, and here's where many people get lost: You READ it. Read it ten times if necessary.

Step three: You reply accordingly or you ask for clarification.

Hopefully we can avoid such misunderstandings in future.

-AC

Ok

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Piss off, you rotund demon.

I'm joking, I don't mean at least half of that.

-AC

*Looks at phone*

Come on, I said voice message damn it. Can't you read?