Child pornography

Started by Rogue Jedi21 pages

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Go back and read my point. You will never stop kids getting harmed, so instead of trying to achieve the impossible, try limiting the damage of the inevitable.

Would you rather have a man jerk off to child porn and never hurt a kid, or have a man go out and kidnap a kid to satisfy his urges?

"They're both as bad!" is not an acceptable answer, as they are not.

-AC


on this, i have to agree with AC. 🙄

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Well it's not more a pipedream than assuming child pornography will be erased.

Paedophilia will always exist.

-AC


yeah, they can say this and say that, but good old child porn will always be here. it sux, but there it is.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
on this, i have to agree with AC. 🙄

i to agree with him on this one too, theres a distinct difference between limiting the damage and letting it have free reign

it is everywhere, and there are more important things to worry about in this day and age.

If you knew a comet would hit Earth, unstoppably, you wouldn't waste time trying to stop it would you? You'd spend time trying to think of ways to limit the damage it would cause.

The same applies to paedophilia.

-AC

i would call bruce willis and tell him to "drill, byatch!!!" 😂

Originally posted by ~Flamboyant~
So you can be arrested/fined even if you accidently stumble across it?
Originally posted by ~Flamboyant~

If you were caught with it, it would be up to you to prove you accidentally stumbled on it nd didn't willfully seek it.

i know. damned if you do and damned if you dont, right?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
i know. damned if you do and damned if you dont, right?

No, not exactly.

you would definitely be questioned, no doubt.

I guess that also goes for pix in the family photo album ; like say the the pix of babies ? running around naked ?

Yes it surely must.

yeah. its like "are those severed heads buried under you floorboards, mr. gacy?"

Child porn is gross

Teenage porn is okay...

No. Its still gross imo. You should be an adult before you enter into pornography.

Originally posted by Alliance
No. Its still gross imo. You should be an adult before you enter into pornography.

I'd go even further, you should be at least 50 year old before you enter pornography...why? I don't know, i jsut like to have opinions without any reasons for them.

My reasons, thanks for asking, would be that children are prone to be exploited sexually. Hence why, when you become a legal adult (18 in the US) it is assumed that you have the intelligence capabilities to manage your own body and display full rights/responsibilities as a citizen.

Why not bundle pornography with the rest of the package?

Originally posted by Alliance
No. Its still gross imo. You should be an adult before you enter into pornography.

Whether it's gross or not is totally IRRELEVANT.

There are 20 year olds who think adult pornography is gross...does that mean we should end all adult porn?

A 14 year old is already a sexual being....responsible ? That depends on the individual. Some 20 year olds are sexually irresponsible as well....I don't think they should be banned from doing something they want to do, if they want to do it....

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Whether it's gross or not is totally [b]IRRELEVANT.

There are 20 year olds who think adult pornography is gross...does that mean we should end all adult porn?

A 14 year old is already a sexual being....responsible ? That depends on the individual. Some 20 year olds are sexually irresponsible as well....I don't think they should be banned from doing something they want to do, if they want to do it.... [/B]

What about the parents? Should parents have no say? Also, how would you judge if a 14 year old is responsible on a case to case basis?

The thing is government states that ADULTS are capable of making decisions and fending for themselves. Children/Minors are not.