Official Doctor Who Thread

Started by Toku King181 pages
Originally posted by Ushgarak
First of all, you should CERTAINLY have the courtesy to read what other people put in their posts, and do not mis-represent what they say. it is extremely bad form to do otherwise.

Why should I respect your posts if you don't respect mine?

Meanwhile- seen all three of them. Again, stop throwing titles at me. Anyone can do that

Anything that comes out of his mouth, whether he's bitching at the Doctor or trying to boss people around.

Because my posts actually have facts and points in them, and also because I bother to read yours before responding. You have to earn respect.

'Anything that comes out his mouth' is not an example! Again. Give examples that show he is more of what you say than any other companion. Come on, if this is such an obvious and glaring trait you should be able to do that.

Adric was a brash teeanger, sure, but not unduly so, and no more than Rose!

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Because my posts actually have facts and points in them

Gee, I must've missed those, because you have given me no proof to why Adric wasn't a brat.

and also because I bother to read yours before responding.

Yeah, so you insult me some more. No thank you to reading that.

You have to earn respect.

Earn respect from a hypocrite that constantly insults me about the same things he doesn't give reason to as well?
Well, I can't ignore you with the button, so I'll just ignore your posts by not caring to read ANY of it or reply.

You don't prove negatives, the onus is upon you to prove it IS true, not for me to prove it is not. Meanwhile I have been discussing things that actually happened in the episodes, whereas all you have managed to do is name episodes he is in, and pretend that is somehow proof. Pretty feeble, eh?

You'll find you cannot ignore me, incidentally, and you will also find that you will be warned again if you carry on basically ignoring what others say and mis-representing their posts.

So, who does everyone think is the worst Doctor of them all?
I'd go with Collin Baker. His outfit is ugly, and he's very unlikable. Heck, in that episode "Mark Of The Rani", I was rooting for the Master to kill him. Seemed like a much nicer guy.

Fair enough, you obviously are unable to argue your point at all, and I am glad that everyone will be able to see that. It is amazing how you could not see that not actually being able to provide a single example at any point in your argument, despite repeated requests, amde your argument weak.

Heck, I could do a better job with your argument than you did. I could easily find a point where Adric is annoying. Not that that would prove anything because at some point just about ALL companions are annoying., Trying to find a oattern where he is worse than most- that you cannot do.

Like I say, the only reason he has got this dislike is because his arguments are coming from a man, not a woman. Doctor Who fandom doesn't seem to care if it is a pretty woman doing all that. That is a shame to be sure.

I'm watching "Dalek Invasion Of Earth" currently, and damn it's cool. I can't get used to the Daleks' voice, though.
I also saw "The Deadly Assassin", and that was really good. A little too confusing at points, but still good.

Did anyone catch the news of a Dr Who film? That is to say at this stage its an idea only and there are no plans in the pipe line yet. What they did not make clear was it to be a TV film or for the cinema, well we will see sooner or later.

Hmmm, I wonder if anything will come of it.

The other Who films were all OK.

Dr. Who and the Daleks.
Daleks- Invasion of Earth 2150 AD.
Dr Who the movie.

So, it could be good.

No, there won't be a movie. That's just a lie. There's no talks at all about it.
Besides, most of the episodes are like mini movies themselves, and some two and three parters such as"Last Of The Timelords", "The Stolen Earth", "Doomsday", "Age Of Steel", and "Evolution Of The Daleks" could be considered movies themselves.

Originally posted by Toku King
No, there won't be a movie. That's just a lie. There's no talks at all about it.
Besides, most of the episodes are like mini movies themselves, and some two and three parters such as"Last Of The Timelords", "The Stolen Earth", "Doomsday", "Age Of Steel", and "Evolution Of The Daleks" could be considered movies themselves.

I did think that, take two episodes and you have a 90 min movie.

However, a movie would probably mean a much bigger budget and higher quality of production.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
I did think that, take two episodes and you have a 90 min movie.

However, a movie would probably mean a much bigger budget and higher quality of production.

All of the episodes I listed were movie level in quality.

Originally posted by Toku King
All of the episodes I listed were movie level in quality.

Not really...

Indeed- not at all, in fact! The Mill cannot possibly rival the output of a typical sci-fi film.

Anyway, Moffat has very recently said he has no objection to a movie, which is about as far as the concept has got.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Not really...

Yeah, they are. I watch LOTTL like it's a film.

It didn't have movie level production standards

Originally posted by Ushgarak
It didn't have movie level production standards

The scores, the video quality, the dialogue, the plots, and the acting are all from what you would see in movies.
So you think "Doctor Who: The Movie" was better in quality, then?

That was a TV movie, but the proiduction values were higher (example- the console room).

You liked the dialogue and plot in Last of the Time Lords? Holy hell... Not that that has anyting to do with film level standards but it still shows a massive want of discretion.

The video quality was NOT film standard, that is way too expensive, and nor where the effects or the sets.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
That was a TV movie, but the proiduction values were higher (example- the console room).

Wha? The console room in the new series is MUCH better than the TV movie, the effects are better, the dialogue's better, the acting's better, the plots are better, the continuity is better, the camerawork is better, and so on and so on.

You liked the dialogue and plot in Last of the Time Lords? Holy hell... Not that that has anyting to do with film level standards but it still shows a massive want of discretion.

So says the guy who likes the episodes with Adric.
LOTTL is one of my all time favorite Doctor Who episodes, and, imo, is one of the Master's greatest stories, next to stuff like "Terror Of The Autons", "Longopolis", "The Deadly Assassin", and so on.

Well i splashed out and bought the complete classic action figures wave 1.
Im still not keen on the new Who packaging.