Football (Soccer)

Started by Phat J527 pages

i know, its like work reading it and having to reply.

ill get back to you tomorrow, i dont feel like it right now.

Oh I know, all that reading...

-AC

maybe you could put out a shorter version for the lazy ones amongst us.

Or is it a typical "Poor amazing Arsenal robbed, Crap lucky Liverpool" post?

Oooooooooooo.

so who should man city sign then? is bridge good enough for citys ambitions?

Originally posted by Bicnarok
maybe you could put out a shorter version for the lazy ones amongst us.

Or is it a typical "Poor amazing Arsenal robbed, Crap lucky Liverpool" post?

If you can't read, I won't oblige you.

-AC

Originally posted by Deano
so who should man city sign then? is bridge good enough for citys ambitions?

City are not good enough for city's ambitions.

Who have they bought though?

Robinho, Kompany and Bridge. Why do people assume that in the first season, people are gonna wanna go there? Had they did what Chelsea did, they'd be alright. Chelsea got a great manager and bought LOTS of new players.

-AC

the difference between chelsea and man city is that chelsea was actually a decent somewhat successful club before they won the lottery and got bought up. city has been shit for a long time and the transition wont be so quick if at all.

Originally posted by T.M
City are not good enough for city's ambitions.

Thats quite a good statement, kind of hits the nail on the head when thinking about Man City´s future with big buying power and all.

The big question is whether big names will want to go to City, ok Robinho went there which I must admit surprised me.

But I just can´t see any real big names going there.

I'm sure they will, in time.

time is illusion vvd. u shud know this

Originally posted by T.M
City are not good enough for city's ambitions.

Congratulations! Despite the attempt at making a mystical insight, that made absolutely no sense whatsoever! Hoo-rah!

Looks like Spurs for the cup. Again.

Plus we've got Defoe. Again.

Also, I really hope Arsene's Arsenal acquire Arshavin. It would be too perfect.

spurs flogged defoe for a reason. he was shite.

so obviously the best thing to do is buy him back 🙂

Maybe he got better🙂

Arshavin was a Euro flash in the Pan, if Arsenal buy him they are daft.

I was wondering why do Arsenals opponents fans sing songs insinuating that Wenger is a child molester, because of the age of the team of is there some history there? (Its a serious question not a wind up so don´t go on the rampage)

Originally posted by Bicnarok
Maybe he got better🙂

Arshavin was a Euro flash in the Pan, if Arsenal buy him they are daft.

I was wondering why do Arsenals opponents fans sing songs insinuating that Wenger is a child molester, because of the age of the team of is there some history there? (Its a serious question not a wind up so don´t go on the rampage)

it was reported a long while ago in the english press that he was seen in thialand holding hands with a young boy.

any one see rafa's rant?

i saw a bit of it yeah. he had a fact sheet prepared and everything.

You can hardly call it a "keagan" style rant, he appeared quite composed. I wonder if the sort of gamesmanship mentioned has an effect on the referee´s and other teams at all.

YouTube video

Rafa has lost it.

The Wenger thing is because he signs young players, and other fans wish they could find similar youngsters. Obviously Dos Santos excepted, who is the new Ronaldinho.

On another note: Bentley! Hahaahahahaha. £18 million. The old ones are the best. Good old Spurs.

Bargain on Defoe though. £9 million for a year's worth of not being able to use him.

They make Man Utd look like penny pinchers.

rafa is a genius on three legs