Thor vs. Hulk

Started by Enyalus141 pages

Originally posted by rorschach_beast
thank u

🙂 im her 4 u man

Originally posted by rorschach_beast
read the comics man
itl'l tell u everything u need to know

I have read the comics. I have every single out of their fights, and I have read each one more than twice, and I have never, seen Hulk:

A)Beat the shit out of Thor?

B) Hulk pick up Mjolnir, swing it, and blast Thor away?

You said:

Originally posted by rorschach_beast
Well
i think the hul has them both

he has beat the shit out of thor
picking up his own hammer and swinging it, blasting hs ass away

So again I ask you:

When the hell has the Hulk ever beat the shit out of Thor, as Hulk has never put Thor down, much less beat the shit out of him?

When the hell did Hulk ever pick up Mjolnir much less use it against Thor?

We are using comics which are cannon, not the "Ultimate Avengers", and "Hulk vs." crap.

Originally posted by kgkg

Thor has made Savage Hulk practically beg to throw his hammer away.

😠

Hulk was characterised horribly in that story-threatening to kill an innocent woman if Thor didn't throw away his hammer. Savage Hulk would never do that. Whoever wrote that story should be shot.

Originally posted by BUSTER1
😠

Hulk was characterised horribly in that story-threatening to kill an innocent woman if Thor didn't throw away his hammer. Savage Hulk would never do that. Whoever wrote that story should be shot.

Didn't Stan Lee write that issue......

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Didn't Stan Lee write that issue......

Say it ain't so

Originally posted by BUSTER1
😠

Hulk was characterised horribly in that story-threatening to kill an innocent woman if Thor didn't throw away his hammer. Savage Hulk would never do that. Whoever wrote that story should be shot.

because his future encarnation hasnt done the same thing? 🙄 maestro did the same damn thing.

WWH came and destroyed Manhattan forgetting about the ppl and casualties.

hulk backhanded and broke rick's back.

come on hulk is a douche back from way back in the day i dont know why ppl are surprised.

hell his power is just his repressed anger and school yard bully that every geeks longs to be able to and unleash. 😉

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
because his future encarnation hasnt done the same thing? 🙄 maestro did the same damn thing.

WWH came and destroyed Manhattan forgetting about the ppl and casualties.

hulk backhanded and broke rick's back.

come on hulk is a douche back from way back in the day i dont know why ppl are surprised.

hell his power is just his repressed anger and school yard bully that every geeks longs to be able to and unleash. 😉

🙄

Maestro was an insane alternate future version of Hulk, who was warped by a century of seeing everyone and everything he loved destroyed.

WWH was concerned about casualties-he gave the peoplw of Manhattan time to evacuate, and when fighting Zom/Strange, he saved innocent bystanders from a collapsing building.

It was Bannerless War Hulk who backhanded Rick and broke his back, whilst under the influence of Apocalypse. When Hulk realised what he'd done, he ripped out Apoc's armour and fled in shame.

Originally posted by SuperiorTech

damn, i cant believe i forgot that one, i am a wolverine fan.. i could kick myself in shame i embarrassed logan and myself. 🙁

Originally posted by SuperiorTech

I believe that Hulk's behaviour was being affected by an outside source in that story. Wolverine even states that Hulk would not have deliberately endangered an innocent bystander before.

Hulk very rarely purposely endangers "innocent's lives"

Unfortunately his definition of innocent is someone who has not angered him.

Originally posted by BUSTER1
Say it ain't so

Stan Lee did write it. That fight was incredibly well written in my opinion including the characterization.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Stan Lee did write it. That fight was incredibly well written in my opinion including the characterization.

So you have no problem with the Hulk acting in a cowardly manner, threatening an innocent in order to gain an advantage in a fight-even though 1 thing that is consistent about Savage Hulk is his tendency to fight only when provoked and to leave innocent people alone. Hell, his 1st fight with Juggernaut started because Cain threatened an innocent family and Hulk stepped in to help them, as he knew Cain was wrong to attack therm

Originally posted by BUSTER1
So you have no problem with the Hulk acting in a cowardly manner, threatening an innocent in order to gain an advantage in a fight-even though 1 thing that is consistent about Savage Hulk is his tendency to fight only when provoked and to leave innocent people alone. Hell, his 1st fight with Juggernaut started because Cain threatened an innocent family and Hulk stepped in to help them, as he knew Cain was wrong to attack therm

He wasn't acting cowardly just smart. It served to portray the difference in power between Thor and Hulk rather clearly. Thor is just that more powerful. I don't believe Hulk would have truly damaged that woman, and as we saw in the end of the issue it was Hulk who won the moral battle. He just wanted to be left alone while Thor wanted to keep on fighting despite the destruction they were causing.

Stan Lee wrote that issue very well in my opinion.

Originally posted by BUSTER1
I believe that Hulk's behaviour was being affected by an outside source in that story. Wolverine even states that Hulk would not have deliberately endangered an innocent bystander before.

This was around the time when he was being controlled off and on by Tyrannus, I only posted it because it reminded me of what happened when he fought Thor and no Hulk is not being effected or under anyones control in this scan.

Originally posted by SuperiorTech
This was around the time when he was being controlled off and on by Tyrannus, I only posted it because it reminded me of what happened when he fought Thor and no Hulk is not being effected or under anyones control in this scan.

Oh yeah, so why did Wolverine comment on how Hulk grabbed and threatened an innocent bystander, if it was in Hulk's nature to do so?

Originally posted by BUSTER1
Oh yeah, so why did Wolverine comment on how Hulk grabbed and threatened an innocent bystander, if it was in Hulk's nature to do so?

Like I stated prior to this he was being controlled off and on for a couple of issues by Tyrannus. In that time he went on rampages, destroyed towns and even killed a plane full of people while being controlled. They had it all over the news Wolverines comments were in regard to those incidents that's why when hulk didn't harm the girl wolverine comments that it's good that he is not completely off the deep end.

Tyrannus was looking for hulk at this point he was not in control.

And it was only further along in thier fight that he actually took control of him.

Like I said I only posted it because it reminded me of the incident with the women when he fought Thor.

Thor still wins.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
He wasn't acting cowardly just smart. It served to portray the difference in power between Thor and Hulk rather clearly.

it's called cunning, savage hulk has always been depicted using his simple thought processes effectively in battle.

Thor kills Hulk.