Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince - Book 2005

what, people arguing about Snape?

Like DD says, he trusts him, so why wouild Snape turn behind his back and betray him? He wouldn't. He may be rough on people, but he would never never never never never go against Dumbledore!!!!!!!!!!

DD can make mistakes. Snape would betray him because Snape is a bad person. What's to stop him from turning against DD?

Are you saying DD wrong?

DDseem very abnormal in this book so mayb he was

to err is human. DD is human, therefore he can have falacies in his judgement.

Give some examples other than the death of DD, and the Vow that proves Snape is evil, after he got a job at Hogwarts.

he spied on DD

🙂

Yeah, what did he tell Bella and Narcissa then???

what do you mean

He could have told the things Dumbledore was up to to Bella and Narcissa or any of the other Death Eaters for that matter. Have you ever thought of this at all? What if the Dark Lord was getting suspicious of Snape's activity at Hogwarts? Dumbledore wouldn't want that to happen, so he had Snape kill him, to make it look like he was plotting against Dumbledore the whole time.

why would Snape report to Narcissa or Bella. he has no reason to. If DD asked Snape to take him out, then why did he act the way he did afterwards

potion side effect, or that the potion didn't completely wear off, or the fact that Snape could be acting, so the other Death Eaters wouldn't think anything about it.

Snape was acting. that's why he fooled DD and the others

He was acting for Dumbledore not for the Dark Lord. He's a double agent. He pretends to be working for the Dark Lord, but in reality he's working for Dumbledore.

double agent, yes. but for Voldy.

^ yup

again I doubt it. No matter what, I am going to say Snape is good. And I hope I'm right...I would hate to think I was wrong, after backing up him and all

wot wud you do if he werent 'good'