I want a new boyfriend!!!

Bardock> No, I disagree. Money, flowers and a piece of furniture do NOT have emotions. I can do with money, flowers and my furniture whatever the HELL I please.
So once again – I fail to see how you can compare love to money. It’s not the money that matters anyways, it’s what I do with it – what I want to USE it for that matters.

Mechmoggy> Ieew! I need to go wash my eyes now… You crazy brit, you…
🙂

Capt> ”Date them both, sleep with them both and have fun with them both. (Maybe even at the same time)”
…
Now that I have not tried in a long time… a long time…
(Falls backwards)
(Climbs back onto chair)

I suppose you can say I am entertaining both of them in a way. I’m flirting with both, and have given both a semi-invitation (not same evening, though) they can think about and act upon in due time.
No, I maybe should not jump into a relationship, but it’s almost a year since I threw my ex-husband out, and some evenings I just miss the cosiness and cuddling up.
I don’t fall in love easily. I do it kinda “backwards”… “Wait a minute, HE was actually kinda cool, intelligent, fun… Why didn’t I…”
There is no such thing as casual relationships. It will always be a question of WHO is more casual, and who is more “on” so to speak.
Now I’ve had the peculiar experience of being told by friends of both gents in question, that “he needs a girlfriend”. I wonder if I should’ve said “Where’s the line?” 😄

Originally posted by The Omega
Bardock> No, I disagree. Money, flowers and a piece of furniture do NOT have emotions. I can do with money, flowers and my furniture whatever the HELL I please.
So once again – I fail to see how you can compare love to money. It’s not the money that matters anyways, it’s what I do with it – what I want to USE it for that matters.

Yes I understand that you disagree....but this emotions don't really matter....you can do with the person what ever the hell you want too (I mean since they can protect themselves its a little harder but still).
You just have this notion that people are more important than furniture but in fact they are the same......and all we do we do for ourself ...even this "Love" Stuff......its easy to explain too......
The only difference is that by law you are not allowed to do everything you please with people....the fact is that you can so.....its no problem...we got taught that people have the same rights as we (and personally I think it is a good way to keep it) but its not a fact...from ones point of view one is the most important thing in the world....if someone else seems to be more important than oneself its just a borrowed importance.....that means if you want the person not to have any harm this has different reasons but not cause you feel compassion for them but that you got taught to feel compassion (you don't actually you would feel bad if you wouldn't and you feel better if you do) or you know that if they feel harm you will feel more harm cause they are the source of slome of your own joy......its all your own feelings for yourself that make it seem like you feel for another person....as that they are no more important than furniture, Stones, Plants, Suns, etc. (more important to you cause of your own importants maybe but not actually more important....)

Originally posted by The Omega

Capt> ”Date them both, sleep with them both and have fun with them both. (Maybe even at the same time)”
…
Now that I have not tried in a long time… a long time…
(Falls backwards)
(Climbs back onto chair)

I suppose you can say I am entertaining both of them in a way. I’m flirting with both, and have given both a semi-invitation (not same evening, though) they can think about and act upon in due time.
No, I maybe should not jump into a relationship, but it’s almost a year since I threw my ex-husband out, and some evenings I just miss the cosiness and cuddling up.
I don’t fall in love easily. I do it kinda “backwards”… “Wait a minute, HE was actually kinda cool, intelligent, fun… Why didn’t I…”
There is no such thing as casual relationships. It will always be a question of WHO is more casual, and who is more “on” so to speak.
Now I’ve had the peculiar experience of being told by friends of both gents in question, that “he needs a girlfriend”. I wonder if I should’ve said “Where’s the line?” 😄

don't get me wrong I adore men but the girlfriends I've had in the past were great..more like a compliment to my hetro relationships..hope I didn't cross the line,I just thought I throw the idea out there.
😄

I will be your Boyfriend Omega! droolio

Bardock> I think we’ll simply have to agree to disagree on the subject.

BadKitty> I tried a girl once, hence the reason I know I’m heterosexual. 🙂 But thanks for the suggestion (Hey, I’m European, it takes more than that to knock me off my chair).

Most probably.......but one is right and one is wrong (I am right by the way....)

You agree with Thomas Hobbes' philosophy on man?

Originally posted by shaber
You agree with Thomas Hobbes' philosophy on man?

Yes...mostly....you figured that?