‘gaysrok’

Originally posted by FeceMan
Okay.

South Baptists who do shit = bad, bordering on evil.
'GAYSROK' = freedom of expression.

my point was that in america our freedom of speech extends to hate groups, so long as they dont incite violence (boy do i hate repeating myself. boy do i hate repeating myself. boy do i hate repe--)

in order to preserve our freedom, all forms of expression which are non-threatening must be allowed. then we leave it up to the american public to decide for themselves. thus, the KKK and those certain baptist groups make themselves look like assholes and americans in general have the sanity to ignore them and see them for the joke that they are. the same as someone who hates gays can go on hating them regardless of what a license plate says.
same as someone who is gay can go on feeling assured in themselves regardless of what some clown puts on their license plate. now, if a plate says "killgays" we step into another issue entirely and they go far beyond freedom of speech.

as i said before and i'll say again, *rhetoric alert!!!* we have to take the good with the bad. thats the only way this freedom is preserved, unfortunately.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Okay.

South Baptists who do shit = bad, bordering on evil.
'GAYSROK' = freedom of expression.

😱

I think I was heading somewhere like this in my earlier posts...

It would be perfect if people in today's society could differentiate between right and wrong in so far as to learn to accept one another's expressions... freedom to say and do what you believe in could be allowed to a certain extent.

If we could rid the world of the evil that corrupts it today, we would be able to be more accommodating of everyone's urge to express themselves freely.

Evil, sanity, right and wrong differ among different people.

-AC

Originally posted by Darth_Janus
Personal decisions meaning they are what? The alphanumerical on the back that IDs the car? A little sign one top? Whatever it is, if it's on a license plate, it shouldn't be there. Period.

Why not? I've said this alot in this thread.

Freedom of Speech.

Originally posted by alcoholicpoet
Why not? I've said this alot in this thread.

Freedom of Speech.

I'm sensing a pattern here...

Originally posted by Darth_Janus
I'm sensing a pattern here...

absolutely i sense a pattern as well.
the avoidance of the point "freedom of speech"

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Evil, sanity, right and wrong differ among different people.

-AC

Originally posted by PVS
absolutely i sense a pattern as well.
the avoidance of the point "freedom of speech"

I think there's a pattern of people justifying this breach of government neutrality with "Oh, they went and did this." In no way am I arguing that what hate groups do or believe is right. The idea that the KKK can congregate in this day and age is ridiculous, and its because of an -abuse- of said freedom of speech that such things can exist.

Long time ago somebody got their foot in the door and said "Oh hey, the law vaguely says I can just express myself however I want. No limitations and no regard for the consequences to others besides myself. Woo hoo!". And thus the same shit that spawned this debate was born. Your freedom to swing your fist ends well before the other person's nose. Same should be for freedom of speech. This isn't a magazine article saying gays are okay, this is a bloody license plate made by the state. I don't care what anyone says, such a thing shouldn't exist and neither should any other kind of customization. You want customization? Eat at Subway.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Please do not use word fagot.

just for the record,gays do indeed 'rok'

I for one would not want to see a licence plate with it on it.But if that woman wants something that stupid on a plate by all means let her.JM

Listen, I know everyone wants to wail away at JM's post, but let me throw something out there. Since we've already established it would be better to have something like "gaysrok," which is a belief, than "gayssuck," which is slander....

...how would you classify (using the same logic, please) "KKKisCool?"

That statement is not straight-out slander (and I'm not in favor of it, of course) and it supports a group that subjectively is disapproved of for the most part. Hell, you could say the same things about gays, could you not? Since that statement could be said about many groups, so what would be the problem?

Originally posted by botankus
Listen, I know everyone wants to wail away at JM's post, but let me throw something out there. Since we've already established it would be better to have something like "gaysrok," which is a belief, than "gayssuck," which is slander....

...how would you classify (using the same logic, please) [b]"KKKisCool?"

That statement is not straight-out slander (and I'm not in favor of it, of course) and it supports a group that subjectively is disapproved of for the most part. Hell, you could say the same things about gays, could you not? Since that statement could be said about many groups, so what would be the problem? [/B]

Wait wait wait a second.......who ever said that "gayssuck" shouldn't be allowed....same thing......its aboot the freedom here (at least I think so)....I don't think she'S allowed to have a license plate like that cause I think gays are cool but I think she can have one because its her own choice to have one.......same with Bigots, Nazis....and even Creationist....

Oh and JM...you are a bigot....but you are right anyways.....

I said it a few pages ago 😛

I know slander is acceptable by freedom of speech standards, and if you want to pride yourself in using the same manner of speaking as JM, then by all means go ahead.

Originally posted by botankus
I said it a few pages ago 😛

I know slander is acceptable by freedom of speech standards, and if you want to pride yourself in using the same manner of speaking as JM, then by all means go ahead.

I don't know idf it is acceptable...I think everyone has the right to state their opinion.......and JM is right when she says: "But if that woman wants something that stupid on a plate by all means let her" .....although I wouldn't have added stupid....

And whi did you change it to KKK.......but still its te same thing.....

Originally posted by Bardock42
Wait wait wait a second.......who ever said that "gayssuck" shouldn't be allowed....same thing......its aboot the freedom here (at least I think so)....I don't think she'S allowed to have a license plate like that cause I think gays are cool but I think she can have one because its her own choice to have one.......same with Bigots, Nazis....and even Creationist....

Oh and JM...you are a bigot....but you are right anyways.....

I am no bigot my friend and that does not make any sence.JM 🙄 😆

Originally posted by Jackie Malfoy
I am no bigot my friend and that does not make any sence.JM 🙄 😆

Actually yes.....sayijng "something that stupid " aboot Homosexuality is bigot (unrational intolerant).....

Fine. She's a bigot and you're a slanderer. Everybody happy?

Originally posted by botankus
Fine. She's a bigot and you're a slanderer. Everybody happy?

I sure am......

Also I don't see why I am a slanderer....

Actually, I'm a slanderer myself for calling you that!