The Official BLEACH series Thread

Started by Q99524 pages

Btw, just how many mook soul reapers does each company have?

It must be a lot to do all these killings (which makes it extra-sad that there's maybe a dozen who stand above the masses).

Originally posted by NemeBro
No tl;dr?

I am almost insulted.

No, I read it. Seemed like information you know that I already know. In fact, you seem to make the same case as I made at the end.

But, sure, tell me more. Persuade me to believe you are not subscribing solely to some moral absolute ideal (not idea because it seems like you feel your position is supremely absolute/perfect which is not the same thing as an "idea"😉.

Anyone else think the Quincies are just pawns to a larger menace lurking in the background?

A bigger threat than the one that is currently making the G13 shit their pants in a way Aizen never did. mmm

Damn.

So now we'll be cutting back and forth between Ichigo's battle against Kirge and the invasion of Soul society?

I was highly disappointed with this chapter, I was expecting an all-out battle chapter. For shame Kubo.

Originally posted by dadudemon
No, I read it. Seemed like information you know that I already know. In fact, you seem to make the same case as I made at the end.

But, sure, tell me more. Persuade me to believe you are not subscribing solely to some moral absolute ideal (not idea because it seems like you feel your position is supremely absolute/perfect which is not the same thing as an "idea"😉.

I believe we had a failure to communicate earlier. I interpreted your use of "solely" as referring to my own moral beliefs in general.

But in this case, yeah, I am subscribing to the belief that some of Mayuri's actions are wholly, absolutely evil, regardless of why they were done.

So who wants to bet the lieutenants are gonna have second thoughts about hanging with Soul Society once they learn their superiors were okay with committing mass genocide? They're already suspecting shinigami are behind it and don't look happy one bit.

Originally posted by NemeBro
I believe we had a failure to communicate earlier. I interpreted your use of "solely" as referring to my own moral beliefs in general.

In a brief, text based, conversation on the internet? No way. awesome

But, yeah, you're probably right.

Originally posted by NemeBro
But in this case, yeah, I am subscribing to the belief that some of Mayuri's actions are wholly, absolutely evil, regardless of why they were done.

AHA!

See! 😠 😠

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yup, you do. This is why you fail.

If you think what he has done, ever, is wrong, you are a moral absolutistuniversalist. 🙂


fixed

Absolutism is a refusal to allow leeway in a moral system.
Universalism is the impulse to extend a single moral system into other situations.

!Relativism = Universalism
!Universalism != Absolutism

Originally posted by Zampanó
fixed

Absolutism is a refusal to allow leeway in a moral system.
Universalism is the impulse to extend a single moral system into other situations.

!Relativism = Universalism
!Universalism != Absolutism

Incorrect. You made my post wrong by changing it.

It would be absolutism because he believes his moral assessment to be objectively correct. AKA, absolute.

Nemebro believes that what Mayuri has done is wrong regardless of the situation. That's the very definition of moral absolutism.

"Moral Absolutism is the ethical belief that there are absolute standards against which moral questions can be judged, and that certain actions are right or wrong, regardless of the context of the act.

...

It holds that morals are inherent in the laws of the universe, the nature of humanity, the will of God or some other fundamental source."

Also, I do not like moral universalism because it is actually a different flavor of moral relativism wrapped up in a disguise that it is moral absolutism with limits. It's not. It is limited to an anthropic interpretation making it not truly a moral "universalism". It wants to pretend to be moral absolutism...sometimes, but it lacks the objective base that absolutism can stand on (because it can appeal to a higher power or source that is supposedly objective in nature). Basically, it's moral relativism with an anthropic restriction.

Ichigo learns of this after his family is attacked and Rukia introduces herself while trying to save him. She senses his ability and passes on her powers to aid him, and the rest is history.

dadudemon is correct, I am applying moral absolutism to Mayuri in this case.

I want to see the Royal Guards or the Zero-Division!

I want to see Orihime nekid.

Love Bleach!!!!!

Bleach is awesome!!! Check out our Bleach amv!!!!!! in HD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Id2kbzTRptM&feature=plcp

Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
I want to see Orihime nekid.

*brofist*

But this is a weird comment.

I get the distinct feeling that nothing happened in Bleach, this week.

And that dude's "release" form is gayer than Astner and I posting pics of our bodies.

It's like 1/3rd of a good chapter.

We got a hint about Uryu, and we got him reveal how he's going to stand up to Ichigo- final form. But little in the way of fighting and those two tidbits don't really add much.

I actually liked the release lol.

So who's stronger, Ichigo's dad or Uryu's dad?