Originally posted by Creshosk
That you're being baised for habving an opinon that differs from mine. 😉Or are only you allowed to claim that? 😕
That's not being biased. That's you not liking it. The FACT here is that Sue is powerful enough to take out all of them singularly. Possibly all at once save for Emma. Who she has beat one on one.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Denial again. 😛
Yes, I'm denying it because it's false. Continue harping on it all you like.
Originally posted by Creshosk
So he never carries gadgets and he always carries gadgets. . . It's amazing how you can contradict yourself in a single paragraph like that. It's truly awe inspiring.
Where? I'm not sure if he does or he doesn't, I'm not his accessoriser, nor are you. So neither of us are in a place to say that due to the rules, he is allowed no weapons.
Originally posted by Creshosk
So now I'm being basied for scripting a non-existent fight in favour of those I want to win, but you aren't being baised, even though you are scripting a non-existant fight in favour of those you want to win?
I'm not, nor have I ever, scripted it.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Oh, right that's your gig. . . I'm supposed to call you old man in retort for calling me boy right?
Do whatever you want.
Originally posted by Creshosk
The rules say that.With prep and gadgets reed owns these mutie freaks. . .
Where in the rules does it state NO gadgets? It states nothing that they wouldn't NORMALLY carry around in a chance encounter, right? My point above was that we don't know if Reed does or doesn't carry stuff around. That's all. Either way I believe he's quite formidable on his own. He can more or less take Wolverine straight out of the fight IF he so chose.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Who said major?
Perfect reply. So it's not major prep? Minor prep then. Reed already knows the X-Men well. That's not prep but it's probably all he needs as I'm sure we can agree.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Binging a weapon to a fight, indicates you knew about the fight before hand, unless you always carry it on you, then it's just being prepared.
Yes but being prepared doesn't count as prepping for a specific fight. We still don't know if Reed carries gadgets. To be honest, we don't need to find out because he can hold his own without them. I'm just saying neither of us know the answer. So we may as well agree to the stipulation that if he has something he regularly carries with him that could do the job, he's allowed to use it.
Originally posted by Creshosk
If you do not regularly carry it with you, then prep is required to retreive said item.
Agreed.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Wolverine's claws are part of him physically. He always has his claws with him. . . he doesn't need prep to get his claws, just as the thing doesn't need prep to get his rocks.
That was connected to my point about us not knowing if Reed has anything on him regularly. If he does he should be allowed to use it.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Who ever this AC person is. . .
You claimed that I said we should bend the rules for the F4. I never.
Originally posted by Creshosk
so Sue could take these four at the same time. Gotcha. 😑
Who said that? I said she could have an extremely good chance of taking out the specified three and with another three formidable members on her team, fighting the same people....following?
Originally posted by Creshosk
But it's unequal without them, remember?
No it's not. That was all part of my point about the possibility of Reed carrying gadgets. The general feel here is that if you don't know something, dismiss it. Which is wrong. We don't know if Reed has a gadget so we assume he doesn't? That's what I mean by being unfair and unequal.
Originally posted by Creshosk
See?
Yeah. By equal I meant if he has gadgets, let him use them. Provided he regularly carries specified items.
Originally posted by Creshosk
"Let's bend the rules for the FF"
It's quite apparant I didn't say that, haven't said it, nor would I ever say it. So lets drop this whole "I'm gonna assume what his comment means" shall we? Goodie.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Wolverine always has his claws with him, Reed doesn't always have his gadgets with him.
Aha, you just proved a point for me, cheers.
It's a random encounter, this fight. Reed doesn't always have his gadgets on, but this time...he might. Who knows? My point is again, don't rob him of something he MAY have. Just because he might NOT have it, don't go and say that he DOESN'T have it. It's like saying Cyclops might not have his visor on this random encounter, so therefore he won't have it.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Prep is needed to aquire these weapons.
Unless he happens to have it on him.
Originally posted by Creshosk
KMC rules are what we default to.
And those are what I am going by.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Who says it doesn't caount as prep? You.
Who says it counts as prep? KMC Rules.
Who's trying to bend the rules? You.
Who's being unfair? "-AC"
How is it prep if, on a random encounter, he has a weapon? How is that prep? You are saying that because he doesn't always have gadgets, he shouldn't have them. It's a random encounter so he might have them. I don't know if Reed does OR doesn't carry stuff with him. Nor do you. So my point is that we shouldn't take it in either way by giving him weapons or taking them away. I'm saying that we should just recognise the possibility.
I'm not bending the rules, nor am I trying to. So stop being a child.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Hyperion was posturing, so its possible sue was as well. You can't always count on what a character is saying to the other person during a battle when its a pschological warfare tactic intended to psyche the other person out.
Possible? Yes. Likely? Not psychologically. If Sue caught Emma off guard and got the better of her, then made the claim, it wouldn't do much good. Psychologically Sue would have said it before she acted if she wanted to psyche her out.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Still seems like posturing to me.
Now who's being biased?
Originally posted by Creshosk
she had "prep".
Yes, "prep". Hence why you put it in inverted commas.
Originally posted by Creshosk
And obviously you know more about the character than the writer does. . . Since you know for sure that she definitly wasn't posturing.
I don't, but since you wanted to get into psychology, I've proven why psychologically it's not likely that she was.
Originally posted by Creshosk
The claim that her poer does move at the speeed of thought.
Well considering the comment followed the action, I'd say you have the burden to prove it's not proven. Because that would suggest it was.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Sure lecture someone who's loved one suffers from the phobia, obviously they don't know as much about it with their secondhand knowledge, than someone with third hand knowledge does.
I know about 5 people, close friends and family, who suffer from it. It doesn't change the fact that area of sight isn't relevant to a claustrophobic. My mother has had attacks in glass elevators. It's a fear of being in enclosed or confined spaces. It's got nothing to do with sight.
Originally posted by Creshosk
They have to feel trapped. if they can see out then they don't feel as trapped.
That's false, because I've had many experiences that disprove you and on top of that, you're factually wrong. Claustrophobia is a fear of enclosed or confined spaces.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Tired of being shut down?"Stop responding to my posts!"
Why don't you start countering mine, instead of responding for the sake of responding? 😉
I am. I've taken you to the woodshed multiple times.
All you do is twist, misinterpret and mirror. You're not doing anything but replying. You're not proving anything, nor are you countering anything. As proven by this post.
-AC