Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Doesn't irritate me, amuses me. Greatly.
Denial #1.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
True, true. Oh, that and the fact that you're not doing what I did. You're doing something childish and claiming I did it.
Denial #2
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm not worried about upsetting fanbases.
Writers are, that's why as such they don't apply.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You ask me who would win, I assess the powers and abilities of each person and/or team, pros and cons, then decide who are the more likely victors.
Don't forget that you factor in your own personal tastes and preferences.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Everyone on this forum more or less seems to be a bunch of X-Men yes men.
Ah yes, the victim routine, since not everyone agrees with you it must be the BOARD that is baised.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Why? She isn't Sue-resistant is she?
😆
Follow the bread crumbs dear.
We were discussing Emma vs Torch.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Who's logic? Yours.
No, common sense sort of logic.
Better we should follow yours? You like a character more so they inherently gain additional powers to help them?
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You are saying it's more likely Torch would be taken out than Emma purely because he's not psionically resistant.
I'm saying its more likely for him to be taken out by Emma than to not be If she is able to get her attack off.
He starts to go nova she starts to mind wipe. Who is more likely to succeed first?
Here's a hint: 30 m/s
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
As said, Emma isn't Sue resistant, why isn't this being considered? Because you don't want to.
So is Sue psionically resistant then since you want to focus on this?
Because a psionic attack can effect multiple peopl at the same time, as it has before.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
What plot? It's a Vs Thread. We're judging on the characters so yes it's a factor. Why wouldn't it be? Because you'd be up slack alley? Exactly.
So the plot is considered, even though this is a vs thread? 😆 look at that a contradiction in one paragraph.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I didn't imply it. You misread my post and misinterpreted it to a degree that you were happy with.
Here's the next denial.
Sad really.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
No. Does Emma have Sue resistance? No. So why are you assuming it's more likely for Torch to be taken out than Emma? Simple question.
Covered this, moving on.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm not here to impress, not suggesting you are either. The fact that you're talking complete nonsense and only replying with mirroring comments, albeit wrong, suggests that you aren't all that anyway.
And I've seen nothing but the same old same old from you, that I see from everyone else. Oh well.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I'm not misreading your posts unintentionally nor intentionally.
Here's another denial. You misread my first post. It has since been pointed out. Now you further it by insisting on sticking to the misread post.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Nor am I refusing to correct myself because there is nothing to correct.
Here's the next denial. You think you're right, you think you read all my posts properly, oddly enough if you had we wouldn't be this involved.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You misread my post so you're implying I should "correct" my post to mean what you interpreted it to mean.
You misread my post first, now I'm being intentionally obtuse until you correct yourself. You are refusing to correct yourself so you continue to be obtuse as well.
I'm fighting fire with fire.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
That would be altering for your intents and purposes, not correcting. I'm not a newbie, you can't twist words with me, sunshine.
Newbie or someone who's been around for awhile, status doesn't determine intelligence.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Yes, why is it? Because you're scripting it so, biasedly.
Not really, I just feel that Emma's mindwipe is faster than Sue's attack.
Sue really didn't prove how fast the attack was when emma was talkign about doing it, since Emma was talking for the plot instead of acting.
Had Emma been acting instead of talking and Sue took her down, I'd be more inclined to beleive that Sue was faster.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
So, speed attacks or not. You're creating a biased and one-sided, scripted fight in which you've gave the F4 a handicap more or less, despite it not being specified in the thread title.
So I'm more baised for following the rules, than you are for wanting to bend the rules in favor of the FF?
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
THEN unintermittedly you form a sequence of events that are unrealistic yet perfectly "realistic" according to you, as how the fight would go.
As opposed to being unrealistic but realistic to you?
That's the real kicker though, anyone that doesn't agree with your opinion, and your veiw is obviously the one that's baised. The whole forum is baised, it's everyone ELSE that's at fault, rather than you.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
When confronted with the fact that we all know that would be far from the case, you claim that comics aren't relevant.
Oh so now suddenly its a "we" who's we? I thought you said that the forum was baised towards the X-side. . . Hmm. . .
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
No, I've shown myself to be of the belief that the F4 would win. You are assuming I'm biased because it gives you some kind of comfort in the subconscious thought of "I'm biased, he is too".
Thanks for confessing, and explaining exactly why you think I'm baised.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I never stated "Emma Frost cannot effect Torch." Let this be a lesson to you for diving in head first and making assumptions.
But obviously it's more realistic for the psionic to be unable to effect the one without the psionic resistence.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I never said it was a non-factor, I said it's not a reason that they will win the battle. You make such huge leaps of connection and fall each time. Let's make a thing clear, I'm no newbie. I'm not impressed nor confused by your oh so played out tactic of "Let's confuse them into conceding or agreeing". Don't play the smart ass, I'm better at it than you.
So you didn't bring it up to make a point, but you didn't bring it up to not make a point. . .
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Not my problem. I'm responsible for what I say, not what you hear.
You also seem to be responsible for what I say, and what I hear whjen reading your posts. . .
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
A) Never said it wouldn't work theoretically. I said it's not going to happen in the comics because nobody is gonna take that and nobody is gonna believe that it could happen.
And why do you suppose that is?
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
B) It's a COMIC Vs forum. Stop acting as if referring to comics is a cardinal sin.
I'm not. But if you're going to reference comics please refer to something that doesn't rely heavily on a plot device.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Cling to? Coming from the guy who has relied on misinterpretation, purposefully I might add, to continue as far as he has, I'd consider who's clinging to who here.
So now you are responsible for what I hear, obviously because you assume I misunderstood, when in truth I cut right through all your BS straight to what you really meant.
Do you have anythign else to support your argument, you should obviously if you aren't clinging to it.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
We're discussing characters, characters that exist in the comics. Stop acting as if referring to comics is "stupid". Emma let slip before, Sue took her out. It's on the CV.
And now we're back to viciously defending the thing that you aren't clinging to.
Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
It's not biased, learn the meaning of the word and stop clinging to that.
No, but obviously I am the one that's baised, even though I clearly don't know the meaning of the word that refers to favoring one side or the other.
You seem to be upset about me using it on you, and pointing out your bais, but there's nothing wrong with you doing the same.