A Decent Versus Thread...

Count Dooku Luke Skywalker (NJO) vs Yoda and Mace Windu

Originally posted by DarthMaul9123
Count Dooku Luke Skywalker (NJO) vs Yoda and Mace Windu

What does this have to do with anything?

well the topic of this thread....a decent vs thread.....

Originally posted by DarthMaul9123
well the topic of this thread....a decent vs thread.....

OMG... Why do people do this?

READ THE FIRST POST BEFORE REPLYING!

Damn, I'm not asking you to do anything that common sense shouldn't.

Obi-Wan 2
Dooku 3

Originally posted by Darth_Janus
OMG... Why do people do this?

READ THE FIRST POST BEFORE REPLYING!

Damn, I'm not asking you to do anything that common sense shouldn't.

And you said i was cranky today! YIKES!

All shall run because the Jawa Masters are in bad moods today!

SCRAMBLE!

Well dude, that is ridiculous to totally skip the first post and just post something random. It's insulting to those of us who took the time to read.

Originally posted by Nai Fohl
Obi-Wan 2
Dooku 3

Obi Wan= 3

Dooku= 3

uh oh, it's getting close.

Originally posted by Illustrious
uh oh, it's getting close.

What happened to the Jawas?

Jawas are divided when it comes to Obi-Wan and Dooku. Those are two very cool dudes in direct competition.

But I blame those who voted for the likes of Exar Kun and Revan. Of course those two will survive the first trial. It's the easiest one.

And no one has commented on my five minute sig. Pfft.

It's a very nice sig.

It...is a very nice sig.

The top text kinda messes it up. It's a picture of Hitler in a car saluting, with the heads substituted with Tarkin, Dooku, and Sidious, of course.

Should we limit the voting to only those who contribute arguments?

Perhaps. But if that's the case we should consider each voter listing certain bullet point inferences and facts that make this person the loser.

well its primarily to stop the flow of fanboys who have nothing but a name from flooding the thread with their votes.

Agreed. I reserve the right to ignore votes if they're clearly not thought out or just at random. Since everyone who has voted thus far I know (somewhat) and they have more likely than not considered the matter, all votes as of now stay.

Originally posted by Illustrious
Should we limit the voting to only those who contribute arguments?

My vote counts, damnit! I contributed semantics! I deserve praise!