Colossus vs. Sabertooth

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Your example is flawed. For the third time: did you read the PIS rule?

yes I just did...it hasn't changed from the last 8 times I read it... 🤨

it still deals with characters being brought up or down to make a suitable matchup for an overpowered or underpowered opponent...

yet I keep seeing you argue against wolverine's healing factor and reffering to pis....as well as a notion I think, that hulk vs. wolverine is pis...when wolverine's first opponent in super hero world was hulk... 🤨

Originally posted by Creshosk
You know what he means, why get on his case about it witha "It's SVFL not PIS!" sort of statment?

SvFl and pIs are pretty much the same thing, no?

Originally posted by jinzin
yes I just did...it hasn't changed from the last 8 times I read it... 🤨

it still deals with characters being brought up or down to make a suitable matchup for an overpowered or underpowered opponent...

yet I keep seeing you argue against wolverine's healing factor and reffering to pis....as well as a notion I think, that hulk vs. wolverine is pis...when wolverine's first opponent in super hero world was hulk... 🤨

Spiderman fought firelord one time, so?

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Why would it be hinted at?

Do they go "oh I'm depowered".

We are having problems grasping PIS/CIS here, its pIS for the whole scene.

Take die and drop it in the water, is half the cup of water red, or the ENTIRE cup?

What are you getting at with this dye analogy if not that?

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Jinzin, they are trying to say that it is PIS for the Hulk not Wolverine.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Why? Because they think that if Wolverine isn't koed in one hit by a brick it must be crap because it doesn't fit in with their flawed ideas and limited experinece with Wolverine... dispite being nothing to even sujest that Hulk (sub in one of the dozens of bricks Wolverine has fought) has been depowered.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
SvFl and pIs are pretty much the same thing, no?

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
This is what you're implying.

Why is it in one case he heals fast enough to not be impeded, but in the other he doesn't?

I'm not saying there are two. YOU are.

Originally posted by jinzin
yes I just did...it hasn't changed from the last 8 times I read it... 🤨

it still deals with characters being brought up or down to make a suitable matchup for an overpowered or underpowered opponent...

yet I keep seeing you argue against wolverine's healing factor and reffering to pis....as well as a notion I think, that hulk vs. wolverine is pis...when wolverine's first opponent in super hero world was hulk... 🤨

Originally posted by Creshosk
So because of one instance where something happens that means the rest of it has to be that way to?

What are you getting at with this dye analogy if not that?

I am still not getting you, you are saying wolverine is consistant 90% of the time, what is with that, it makes your points unreliable...

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Well at least someone gets it.
So we disregard all Hulk's considerable feats of strength. You're likely response: "But, but, but... Wolverine takes hits from other cl100's too." So we disregard all those cl100's considerable feats of strength.

It makes no sense other than wanting to see wolverine depowered

Originally posted by Creshosk
No it's not. I'm saying that wolverine heals instantly in both cases, or virutally instantly if you don't like those comicisms. . . You're saying that he can take armies without being cut up so fast that he bleeds to death, yet he can't heal instantly from a hulk punch.

Why is it in one case he heals fast enough to not be impeded, but in the other he doesn't?

I'm not saying there are two. YOU are.

There are two healing factors, its a plot device.

Wolverine heals right back without latency is garbage plain and simple, we'be been over what you are implying.

"he heals before the damage is registerd.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
I am still not getting you, you are saying wolverine is consistant 90% of the time,

He's inconsistant because there is a 10% of the time that he's not like the 90%.

But that 90% of consistancy out weight the 10% of inconsistance.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
what is with that, it makes your points unreliable...

Originally posted by Creshosk
No it's not. I'm saying that wolverine heals instantly in both cases, or virutally instantly if you don't like those comicisms. . . You're saying that he can take armies without being cut up so fast that he bleeds to death, yet he can't heal instantly from a hulk punch.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Not up and down. One character down. Makes weaker opponent seem stronger and/or for advancement of a storyline.

ahhhhhhhhhhhh so wolverine only "seeeeemed" 😏 stronger than he really was.................................

in his first appearance? 😕

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Gotta disagree and this is where the confusion lies.

I know the difference, Svfl happens once and isn't shown again, PIS happens NUMEROUS times..

Did you not see the "Or for advancement of storyline."?

Originally posted by Creshosk
Do you even listen to yourself?

He's inconsistant because there is a 10% of the time that he's not like the 90%.

But that 90% of consistancy out weight the 10% of inconsistance.

Why because I'm not using the 10% PIS happenings with Wolverine being knocked out?

He's not 90% consistent either, do you listen to yourself at all?

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
There are two healing factors, its a plot device.[b/]

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
[B]Wolverine heals right back without latency is garbage plain and simple, we'be been over what you are implying.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
"he heals before the damage is registerd.

yes, and my point still stands...

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Staggered attacks healing fast vs a single attack of force that kills/comas/KOs instantaneously healing the instant/during the time damage is done.