Demonic Possession, A Realy Possibility?

Started by Great Vengeance29 pages

I think we have settled demons dont exist, move along people.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
So while I can take it lighter than I would if you meant it offensively, the very fact that you chose to interject yourself where you have no right, is offensive to me.
-AC

And therein lies the rub.

Originally posted by Great Vengeance
I think we have settled demons dont exist, move along people.

um, we didn't settle that they don't exist. we basically spent our time fighting over Ghost....demons..you know what I am not even gonna start again. My opinion is Demons are real. Note its only an opinion.

Originally posted by Great Vengeance
I think we have settled demons dont exist, move along people.

Wtf? No we didn't, and we never will.

I think demons exist. But they're not from Hell, to me there is no Hell, demons are created from negative energy.

Negative energy in my opinion is right, just like we have positive energies....not demonic......that's just the name we place on it. There are polarities to everything.

Originally posted by BlackC@t

I think demons exist. But they're not from Hell, to me there is no Hell, demons are created from negative energy.

Yeah, Hell would just be a silly idea wouldn't it?

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Yeah, Hell would just be a silly idea wouldn't it?

OUCH.

That sarcasm left teeth marks!

I personaly believe demons are patheons and society has grown to be unaccepting of the fact that gods have selfish agendas and let emotion override logic in alot of cases. They don't want to think for a second dieties are simply more powerful humans, who have wants and needs. And hold thier own values and are willing to go to extremes much like many people are.. But then my entire basis on faith and spirituality was never happy-times.. It's a dark and dreary world. And it's like that for a reason..

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Yeah, Hell would just be a silly idea wouldn't it?

I believe there is a Hell and I believe there is a Heaven. The Heaven in Hell that are mentioned in the Bible.

Each to their own.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Each to their own.

what do you believe in? Just out of curiosity?

Originally posted by Raven Guardia
what do you believe in? Just out of curiosity?

I suppose I'm a pessimistic agnostic.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
I suppose I'm a pessimistic agnostic.

does that mean your not sure if you believe in God or not? 😮 sorry, I dont know exactly what your views are 😮

Originally posted by Raven Guardia
does that mean your not sure if you believe in God or not? 😮 sorry, I dont know exactly what your views are 😮

Yes, agonistics aren't sure if they believe in God or not. Though for that matter one could call themself a Buddhist, but then agnostics are like the wussy athiests not proud enough to admit they don't believe in anything.

Just as Satanists are just athiests who want to intimidate people and fail miserably..

Originally posted by Spelljammer
Yes, agonistics aren't sure if they believe in God or not. Though for that matter one could call themself a Buddhist, but then agnostics are like the wussy athiests not proud enough to admit they don't believe in anything.

Just as Satanists are just athiests who want to intimidate people and fail miserably..

i disagree ther actually.....I think agnostics are people that see it from the real point of view.....atheist are people that just don't believe..donY't even consider it....Buddhists have an own Mythology, set of morals...they are basically a religion...or at least an Ideology....and Satanists...well...really...who cares for the anyways, except for the few people they slice up once in a while...

Originally posted by Spelljammer
Yes, agonistics aren't sure if they believe in God or not. Though for that matter one could call themself a Buddhist, but then agnostics are like the wussy athiests not proud enough to admit they don't believe in anything.

Just as Satanists are just athiests who want to intimidate people and fail miserably..

😆 Your funny 😛..seriously that wasn't sarcasm. But what you said is true, or at least I agree with you.

Originally posted by Spelljammer
Yes, agonistics aren't sure if they believe in God or not. Though for that matter one could call themself a Buddhist, but then agnostics are like the wussy athiests not proud enough to admit they don't believe in anything.

What's brave about atheism?

I have a neutral stance on it. To be against something, you have to imbue it with some kind of standing, that's why atheism always seems a bit idiotic to me.

Imagine if there was a word for someone that doesn't believe in fairies.

An afairist. If someone said to me, 'do you believe in fairies, or are you an afairist?', I wouldn't say I'm an afairist, I'd say shut the **** up.

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
What's brave about atheism?

I have a neutral stance on it. To be against something, you have to imbue it with some kind of standing, that's why atheism always seems a bit idiotic to me.

Imagine if there was a word for someone that doesn't believe in fairies.

An afairist. If someone said to me, 'do you believe in fairies, or are you an afairist?', I wouldn't say I'm an afairist, I'd say shut the **** up.

Hm interesting approach...I just always thought, to be an agnostic would be the most logical thing.....I mean I don't have proof but I can't disprove either.....I live my live as if there wasn't but sure, there could be.....just cause all Swans I have seen are white doesn't mean they all are....

Whoever slices someone up in the name of religion is an idiot anyway. Satanist, Christian, Jew, whatever. There's a very famous person blowing people up in the name of God today, he's no different to the "Satanists" then is he? Besides the fact that he's a Christian and that apparantly makes it ok. Murder in the name of a "good guy" is passable while murder in the name of the devil is not. Found that strange for as long as I can remember.

On what Spelljammer said: You can also say that people who believe are just wussy atheists who are afraid to admit there's nothing.

But you wouldn't because it's called respecting belief. Something you claim to do but obviously do not.

-AC

Originally posted by Bardock42
Hm interesting approach...I just always thought, to be an agnostic would be the most logical thing.....I mean I don't have proof but I can't disprove either.....I live my live as if there wasn't but sure, there could be.....just cause all Swans I have seen are white doesn't mean they all are....

well, I dont see how its Logical...I mean if your not sure about what you believe in how is that logical?.