Batman 89 and Batman Returns

Started by Mandorallen6 pages
Originally posted by Mr Parker
they are actually indeed crappy films.the movies totally butchered to death his character,they dont deserve to be called batman the way burton turned him into a cowardly killer killing people in cowardly ways,the ulimate sin him killing the joker,burton should be shot for such a travesty of justice betraying the comics like that. BATMAN BEGINS is 100 times better,it didnt make the same stupid mistakes burton did.

well i agree on one account.

begin's was 100x better. thats it.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Batman '89 ruled. It was the best Batman until "Batman Begins" the other 3 batman movies sucked hard.

What killed me was the "Batman platinum card". The movies almost made me not like Batman the character anymore but i kept the faith and it paid off with "Batman Begins"

Hearing that Batman '89 sucked or was a bad movie was the 1st time I've ever heard that in my life. Tim Burton is a great director and Keaton was perfect as Batman, he pulled it of 10 times better than Kilmer and Cloony did combined in my opinion.

The Batman has been resurrected as a result of the abortion of a movie Forever and Batman and Robin were. Demand turned on the Bat sign. and he returned, kick-ass style.

Batman Begins is the best Batman movie.

I have high hopes for the sequel.

well your halfway right.ALL four of them sucked hard.Burtons batman movies sucked even more hard than forever because keaton was such a horrible casting choice as others here have tried to point this out to you.Burton is a good director,but not when it comes to batman films.Keaton a perfect batman? 😆 thats hilarious.batman isnt a short runt who gets the crap beat out of him by ONE guy who has no special fighting skills.He was horribly miscast,he didnt even fit the part.Kilmer would have been great if he had just had good lines to work with,he suffered frome a bad script though with corny lines.again,ALL the BATMAN movies,the burton AND schumacher batman films,were abortions of a batman movie.thank god for batman begins because you got one thing right here.

BATMAN BEGINS is the best batman movie ever. 😄

Originally posted by Mr Parker

BATMAN BEGINS is the best batman movie ever. 😄

understatement of the year.

Originally posted by TMACalicious
Batman 89 and Batman Returns are very good. They are without a doubt far more superior than Schumacher's. Batman Begins is the best out of all of them tho.

And I totally agree with FistOfTheNorth. Burton is one fantastic director, Keaton was awesome as Wayne/Batman, Kilmer made Batman look bad, and Clooney made the whole franchise into a joke with all the puns and bad lines.

But I have to say Bale is the best Batman ever. 2nd would have to be Keaton. As for Kilmer and Clooney.... Well.... Let's not talk about them 😛

Man their crap.they are only superiour in being more crappy than batman forever.yeah burton is a fantastic director but not when it comes to batman films.Keaton was awesome as bruce wayne? that is hysterical. 😆 bruce wayne isnt a short runt who is half bald and acts like a bumbling dolt around women. 🙄 Kilmer made batman look much better than keaton did and brought respect back to his character by not killing people in cowardly ways and making a mockery of batmans character like burton did.He also made batman look much better than keaton did by showing what a true martial arts expert he is taking out 6 goons of two faces at the beginning.Burtons batman was a disgrace to the comics making him look like a wuss getting the crap beat out of him by one guy 🙄 now clooney? you wont get any argument out of me on THAT one because your correct on that count.I would also say your correct on Bale being the best ever.no question on that one.

Originally posted by Mandorallen
understatement of the year.

Not only would I say best batman movie ever but best film of the year as well. 💃

Originally posted by Mr Parker
well your halfway right.ALL four of them sucked hard.Burtons batman movies sucked even more hard than forever because keaton was such a horrible casting choice as others here have tried to point this out to you.Burton is a good director,but not when it comes to batman films.Keaton a perfect batman? 😆 thats hilarious.batman isnt a short runt who gets the crap beat out of him by ONE guy who has no special fighting skills.He was horribly miscast,he didnt even fit the part.Kilmer would have been great if he had just had good lines to work with,he suffered frome a bad script though with corny lines.again,ALL the BATMAN movies,the burton AND schumacher batman films,were abortions of a batman movie.thank god for batman begins because you got one thing right here.

BATMAN BEGINS is the best batman movie ever. 😄

Lol, I read in one of your post that Keaton as Batman was pudgy, short and bald? That made me lowly chuckle..Keaton as batman rocked. And can you tell me whom Burton's Batman killed?, because i don't recall, not saying he didn't, just askin' you to refresh my memory.

Kilmer was a Joke as the Batman and don't get me started on Cloony, lol. Keaton gave me the best and most convincing Batman impression out of all the movies. And Keaton wasn't as you describe, you falsified his appearance, don't do that. He was slim, he was fit. He wasn't short, he looked great in the bat suit and he kicked ass. What about when he was fighting those thugs in the alleyway, what about when he blocked every single hit that double machete-wielding Asian thug delivered. I saw about 6 clean skillful blocks in a row, with his arms and legs, in that scene, only to make the dude somersault, knocking his ass out. That was part was frikken kick ass. So don't say he couldn't fight.

A "Batman Returns" line i like also:

Penguin in Batman's face: "You don't really think you'll win do you?"

That lines a Classic.

yea cuz Batman totally didn't kill Two-Face by throwing coins in the air and letting him plunge to his death in Batman Forever....

Originally posted by FistOfThe North

A "Batman Returns" line i like also:

Penguin in Batman's face: "You don't really think you'll win do you?"

That lines a Classic.

A classic scene that was.

I loved it.

"I played this stinkin city like a harp from hell" I like that line.

i liked "eat floor, high fiber"

Guard: don't kill us lady!

Guard: we only make 300 bucks a week!

Catwoman: get lost..your over payed. (think that's how the lines went)

Catwoman: You and I have something in common.
Penguin: Sounds familiar.Appetite for destruction?? Contempt for the zsars of fashion?? Wait don't tell me.Naked sexual charisma.
Catwoman: Batman.The thorn in both our sides.The fly in our ointment.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
BATMAN BEGINS is 100 times better

Earlier on you found an understatement

Well now i've found an overstatement

To say that "Batman Begins" was 100 times better than "Batman" '89 is pushing it and smells of fan-boyism.

You also said something along the lines of, according to you, from now on, "Batman Begins" is the 1st true action "Batman" movie i started lmao.

"Batman Begins" had more drama than action more than that any of the previous Batman movies. Don't get it twisted, guy.

😎

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Lol, I read in one of your post that Keaton as Batman was pudgy, short and bald? That made me lowly chuckle..Keaton as batman rocked. And can you tell me whom Burton's Batman killed?, because i don't recall, not saying he didn't, just askin' you to refresh my memory.

Kilmer was a Joke as the Batman and don't get me started on Cloony, lol. Keaton gave me the best and most convincing Batman impression out of all the movies. And Keaton wasn't as you describe, you falsified his appearance, don't do that. He was slim, he was fit. He wasn't short, he looked great in the bat suit and he kicked ass. What about when he was fighting those thugs in the alleyway, what about when he blocked every single hit that double machete-wielding Asian thug delivered. I saw about 6 clean skillful blocks in a row, with his arms and legs, in that scene, only to make the dude somersault, knocking his ass out. That was part was frikken kick ass. So don't say he couldn't fight.

A "Batman Returns" line i like also:

Penguin in Batman's face: "You don't really think you'll win do you?"

That lines a Classic.

Your clearly in a world of denial here because your the ONLY Burton apologist batman fan-"someone who refuses to see the shortcomings and failures of burtons horrible batman films." your the only one on here I have encountered that has gone to the extents of denying that Keaton was short,pudgy and half bald.All the other burton apologists at least have all acknowledge he wasnt physically right for the role and had the wrong look.Their weak argument has always been _sure he wasnt physically right for the role but he was a great batman because he did such a great job in his role.That is a bad argument as well because according to that logic,if a guy is 400 pounds and is 5 feet tall is considered the best actor in the world,then according to that kind of logic,he should be cast for batman.your chuckling about that because your clearly living in denial on that count.

Okay Keatons Batman killed people in cowardly ways when he drove the unmanned batmobile into the jokers warehouse with clear intentions to murder those thugs by dropping the bomb right in front of them.That was so cowardly of batman to do that.Then there is the end when he shot the batarang at joker and caused him to fall to his death.He caused his death and regardless of the jokers past actions batman should have been wanted for murder at the end by the police instead of them treating him like a damn hero.thats horrible screenwriting at its worst.Then there is Batman returns where again,like a coward,he puts a bomb in the pants of one of the goons of the penguins.Burton made batman into such a cowardly killer,I was hoping he would die in the first batman movie,him killing people like that makes him no better of a person than those criminals.Those kind of things would have been good in a punisher movie,but this is a batman movie for god sakes.Burton butchered to death his character.Even in the begiing when batman carries a gun and killed people,he only did so when he absolutely had to and there was no other way>he never did it in such cowardly ways that burton had him doing it with the clear intentions to murder people.

NO that was Keaton that was a joke as batman because you obviously missed again batman is NOT a short runt who gets the crap beat out of him by one guy. 🙄 The proof is in the pudding that keaton is a short runt.just freeze the VCR sometime and as bruce wayne,it shows he is no taller than kim basinger is in his scenes with her.You must need glasses if you never noticed that.again your living in a world of denial here.Underneath his shirt you can clearly see a pudgy belly sticking out as bruce wayne.I also just proved to you that he was in fact a short runt. 😄 next thing your going to say is he had a full set of hair in your desperate attempts to show he was a good batman. 😆

Thats what is so inexcusable about burtons batman films is how he somehow beats up those guys and then later gets the crap beat out of him by ONE goon,the jokers at the end.a guy with no special fighting skills.horrible and inconsistent screenwriting.

Oh and about clooney,dont worry,you wont get any argument from me on that one.I would say he was an even worse choice for batman than keaton was.Clooney is one ugly looking dude and this guy gets cast for handsome bruce wayne? just like keaton,he was a joke as batman as well.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Earlier on you found an understatement

Well now i've found an overstatement

To say that "Batman Begins" was 100 times better than "Batman" '89 is pushing it and smells of fan-boyism.

You also said something along the lines of, according to you, from now on, "Batman Begins" is the 1st true action "Batman" movie i started lmao.

"Batman Begins" had more drama than action more than that any of the previous Batman movies. Don't get it twisted, guy.

😎

No its not because any true batman fan-the ones that dont accept those crapfest burton/schumacher batman films would see those films for what they are.Pure crap.The only thing that Burton did right in the first film was casting Kim Basinger as Vickie Vale.She is the ONLY thing that makes the first film worth sitting through.The other scenes without her is when its time to fastforward the VCR. your getting it twisted that Keaton wasnt a short runt and half bald dude.Yes Batman Begins is the first true live action batman movie and Begins actually had a nice balance of action and drama in it unlike those crapfest Burton films.Thats why I say Batman Forever is by far much better than that crapfest batman 89 because batman 89 was boring as hell.The first hour in half all they did was stand around talking the whole damn time with just a few actions scenes here and there and the action didnt begin till the last 30 minutes of the movie.boring boring boring.at least forever had a lot more action in it like a batman movie SHOULD have.thats insane for a batman movie to have them just stand around and talk most the time. 🙄

Long live BTAS

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Your clearly in a world of denial here because your the ONLY Burton apologist batman fan-"someone who refuses to see the shortcomings and failures of burtons horrible batman films." your the only one on here I have encountered that has gone to the extents of denying that Keaton was short,pudgy and half bald.All the other burton apologists at least have all acknowledge he wasnt physically right for the role and had the wrong look.Their weak argument has always been _sure he wasnt physically right for the role but he was a great batman because he did such a great job in his role.That is a bad argument as well because according to that logic,if a guy is 400 pounds and is 5 feet tall is considered the best actor in the world,then according to that kind of logic,he should be cast for batman.your chuckling about that because your clearly living in denial on that count.

Okay Keatons Batman killed people in cowardly ways when he drove the unmanned batmobile into the jokers warehouse with clear intentions to murder those thugs by dropping the bomb right in front of them.That was so cowardly of batman to do that.Then there is the end when he shot the batarang at joker and caused him to fall to his death.He caused his death and regardless of the jokers past actions batman should have been wanted for murder at the end by the police instead of them treating him like a damn hero.thats horrible screenwriting at its worst.Then there is Batman returns where again,like a coward,he puts a bomb in the pants of one of the goons of the penguins.Burton made batman into such a cowardly killer,I was hoping he would die in the first batman movie,him killing people like that makes him no better of a person than those criminals.Those kind of things would have been good in a punisher movie,but this is a batman movie for god sakes.Burton butchered to death his character.Even in the begiing when batman carries a gun and killed people,he only did so when he absolutely had to and there was no other way>he never did it in such cowardly ways that burton had him doing it with the clear intentions to murder people.

NO that was Keaton that was a joke as batman because you obviously missed again batman is NOT a short runt who gets the crap beat out of him by one guy. 🙄 The proof is in the pudding that keaton is a short runt.just freeze the VCR sometime and as bruce wayne,it shows he is no taller than kim basinger is in his scenes with her.You must need glasses if you never noticed that.again your living in a world of denial here.Underneath his shirt you can clearly see a pudgy belly sticking out as bruce wayne.I also just proved to you that he was in fact a short runt. 😄 next thing your going to say is he had a full set of hair in your desperate attempts to show he was a good batman. 😆

Thats what is so inexcusable about burtons batman films is how he somehow beats up those guys and then later gets the crap beat out of him by ONE goon,the jokers at the end.a guy with no special fighting skills.horrible and inconsistent screenwriting.

Oh and about clooney,dont worry,you wont get any argument from me on that one.I would say he was an even worse choice for batman than keaton was.Clooney is one ugly looking dude and this guy gets cast for handsome bruce wayne? just like keaton,he was a joke as batman as well.

How can I refuse to see short comings and failures that aren't there.

You know what, I'll have to re-watch Batman '89 in order to see what you somehow and apparently see that no one I know, including "true" Batman fans don't see at all. I'm not saying your perspectives aren't in the film, just wanna see if they really are in there for myself. But since i haven't seen it in like a year, i wont elaborate much in this discussion because, like i said i wanna re-watch the film again due to the fact that i'm not closed minded even though you said im in denial which your wrong in, of course, but I digress.

You said Keaton as Batman was pudgy which basically means you're calling him short and fat, literally. Look it up. Keaton was in no way short and fat. Christian Bale as height Bruce Wayne is 6' (1.83 m). http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000288/bio . Micheal Keatons height as Bruce was 5' 10" (1.78 m) . http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000474/bio
Are you telling me that Keaton being shorter than Bale as Bruce Wayne, by only a mere 2 inches makes Keaton short pudgy and "horribly cast" as you said on a previous post, as Batman? And did you ever even considered the fact that Vikki Vale was probably as tall as Keaton/Wayne was because of the high stiletto heels she always had on?

Ok. Keatons Batman killed no one in cowardly ways when he drove the unmanned batmobile into the jokers warehouse. He was destroying an immanent terrorist threat. The building along with any other threats, but the building mostly. Batman is a detective and detectives are similar to cops kinda. And sometimes cops kill thugs for good reasons, one of them is imminent threat. Are those cops cowardly for killing thugs that almost kill them. If your answers yes than your in the minority buddy. Just like your in the minority in saying Batman '89 sucked. But to each his own right?

So Batman is, in your words, "a cowardly killer" because he put a bomb in the pants of that one goon that tried to kill him. What would you have done? Say "stoppit!" lol or "shoo" maybe. To me, Batman would've been a coward if he didn't do what he did. And thats beside the fact that Batman was pissed off out of his mind already. He about had it with the Penguin and goons at that point. ANd I don't recall Batman carrying a gun and killing people as you said.

Ah the biggest Batman '89 misconception: Batman killed the Joker. Batman did not kill the Joker. Batman merely attached his batarang around the Jokers ankle with the intention of not allowing him to escape or capturing him, not murder him as you so falsely believe. And obviously and with reason, given the moment, Batman, like anyone else, didn't take into account how much the Joker's fat arse weighed and/or how strong the statue was. But to say Batman intentionally killed the Joker would be incorrect. Why do you think Batman kept a shocked glare down at the Joker as he fell. It was as if Batman couldn't believe the Joker fell.

I think you need trifocals more than i need the glasses because I dont think you clearly saw in Batman '89 when the Batjet crashed into the church head on. You try telling me how you feel after a plane crash. Then after you tell me how you feel, climb 50 or more stories and fight a well rested bulky goon that wants you tears you to shreds, but remember you have to beat him, just like Batman did. Then tell me, ok.

And your Cloony remark about him being ugly, id have to say nothing about it. I dont know what an ugly guy looks, I'm hetro. And didn't people mag vote him like the sexiest guy alive a couple of years ago? I thought girls went nuts over Clooney..

Originally posted by Mr Parker
No its not because any true batman fan-the ones that dont accept those crapfest burton/schumacher batman films would see those films for what they are.Pure crap.The only thing that Burton did right in the first film was casting Kim Basinger as Vickie Vale.She is the ONLY thing that makes the first film worth sitting through.The other scenes without her is when its time to fastforward the VCR. your getting it twisted that Keaton wasnt a short runt and half bald dude.Yes Batman Begins is the first true live action batman movie and Begins actually had a nice balance of action and drama in it unlike those crapfest Burton films.Thats why I say Batman Forever is by far much better than that crapfest batman 89 because batman 89 was boring as hell.The first hour in half all they did was stand around talking the whole damn time with just a few actions scenes here and there and the action didnt begin till the last 30 minutes of the movie.boring boring boring.at least forever had a lot more action in it like a batman movie SHOULD have.thats insane for a batman movie to have them just stand around and talk most the time. 🙄

Are you insinuating that "true" Batman fans are not true if they like Batman '89. If so you, you're just being comical now.

So, to you, Vikki Vale was the ONLY thing that made the first film worth sitting through? Why, cause she was cute? Not very subtle, are you.

I've been using my "Batman Forever" DVD case with Dvd in it, as a doorstop, ever since the first and last time seeing the film. "Forever" sucked so hard, lol.

You must be crazier than the Joker if you think anything Batman is filled with non-stop action from beginning to end. You made it sound like that when you wrote " a lot more action in it like a batman movie SHOULD have."..Any story with too much action and little depth is doomed to fail.

First of all: michael keaton isnt 5,10, he is shorter. Jack nicholson is like 5'8 and he was taller than keaton. Keaton is 5'7 as much. See his movies and compare his height with another actors. Shorter than jack nicholson, matthew moddine, melanie grifith, robert de niro, keneth branagh, alec baldwin, geena davies, denzel washintong, etc.

Bale is 6'1, compare his height in his another movies with another actors.

Batman begins have a very nice balance between action and drama. The burton movies were more about weird things and boring dialogues of the villains than action. The schumacher films were the same but more gay.

The correct way to make a batman movie is get a nice balance between drama and action, not one thing more than the other, and batman begins did it in a fine way.

Yeah, forever sucked, as the other three films sucked as well.

That is a poor excuse for batman being beat by that goon of the joker. Batman is martial arts artist, that isnt a valid excuse. He didnt look that hurted when he beat the crap of the joker.

That is simlply false. Batman knowed that the cathedra was in a bad condition. See how the jokers breaked the wall only with a few kicks. Batman isnt an idiot , he knowed that if he trapped the joker with the batarang to the gargoyle, the helicopter could break that runied gargoyle. Come one, batman is a very clever man, even an idiot could see that. What a poor excuse.

Keaton was short and out of sharpe. You are the one how need glasses.

Any true batman fan could see that the four previous movies were totally unfaithful to the comics and bad movies, that didnt any kind of justice to the character. Batman beings did.

Originally posted by bakerboy
First of all: michael keaton isnt 5,10, he is shorter. Jack nicholson is like 5'8 and he was taller than keaton. Keaton is 5'7 as much. See his movies and compare his height with another actors. Shorter than jack nicholson, matthew moddine, melanie grifith, robert de niro, keneth branagh, alec baldwin, geena davies, denzel washintong, etc.

Bale is 6'1, compare his height in his another movies with another actors.

That is a poor excuse for batman being beat by that goon of the joker. Batman is martial arts artist, that isnt a valid excuse. He didnt look that hurted when he beat the crap of the joker.

That is simlply false. Batman knowed that the cathedra was in a bad condition. See how the jokers breaked the wall only with a few kicks. Batman isnt an idiot , he knowed that if he trapped the joker with the batarang to the gargoyle, the helicopter could break that runied gargoyle. Come one, batman is a very clever man, even an idiot could see that. What a poor excuse.

Keaton was short and out of sharpe. You are the one how need glasses.

Again, Christian Bale's height as Bruce Wayne is 6' (1.83 m). http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000288/bio . Micheal Keatons height as Bruce was 5' 10" (1.78 m) . http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000474/bio

So plane-crashing dead on into a cathedral and surviving, getting out and then climbing up 50 or more flights to face a well rested muscle-headed goon is a poor and invalid excuse for Batman getting hit a few times even though Batman defeated the guy? lol

Wake up and smell the Foldgers.

And hey, I may need glasses to you, which I don't, but at least my spelling is "sharpe",

like me.. 😎