Originally posted by Cosmic Cube
I gave an explanation of how gamma rays have the said effect on their victim. It's a few pages back. Anyone who has gained powers as a result of gamma radiation gained them because of their subconscious mind. Don't act like I haven't explained this.
I read your "explanation" - I guess Emil's secret fantasy was to be a giant green serpentine monster, huh?
Since Stan Lee is the u]creator[/u] of the Hulk. His opinion outweighs yours, mine, or the opinion of any of the Hulk's other writers. Stan Lee's *view* is the Hulk's history.
I take exception to that view - a character does not belong to the creator because the character is greater than the creator. The Hulk is the sum total of every writer who has ever written him. If Stan Lee's view of the Hulk's history is different from the Hulk's WRITTEN history, we are obligated to disregard that view - views aren't canon. Peter David, the longest writer of Hulk said that Hulk could beat Galactus. Now we have people like DevilHulk peeing himself running around the boards with "proof" that Hulk > Galactus.
A short while ago, you said that the writer's idea of the feat means more than the actual feat. Now you're saying the opposite. Have you changed your mind?
You're twisting my words and you know it, CC. I said you have to gauge the writer's intent, rather than fanboy Hulk scientists making more out of a feat than they should. That has no bearing whatsoever on my statement that Stan Lee's opinion is outweighed by the actual written history of the Hulk. I have no idea how you could make that conclusion.
What exactly is DKR? Was this normal Superman? Can you give an issue number on this? You seem to be a bit confused at what Superman can and cannot do, so with all due respect, I can't exactly trust your judgement. A few pages ago, you were telling me that he can lift at least half the weight of the universe. And since you've yet to prove that Superman has a strength advantage over Hulk to start with, your point is moot.
So now because you deem me "confused" about Superman you disregard evidence? DKR is Dark Knight Returns - it was indeed normal Superman. Pick up the series - it's great.
And - um - speaking of confused - YOU also said that Superman starts out with a strength advantage over every version of the Hulk except Savage and Mindless, and the same base strength as Savage. Are you retracting that statement now?
Superman's calm feat (moving between 1/3 and 1/2 the weight of Earth) STILL far outweighs anything Hulk's plate moving, a feat not even unique to Hulk.
You don't exactly seem to have an in depth knowledge of physics, so I'll explain a few things to you. Black holes do NOT have infinite gravitational pull. I don't know where you heard this. Gravity acts over an infinite distance, so if a black hole had infinite gravity, the entire universe would collapse into it. The force of gravity depends on how close you are to the said object, and it's mass.
You don't exactly seem to have an in depth knowledge of physics, so I'll explain a few things to you.
http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/BlackHoleAnat.html
"Applying the Einstein Field Equations to collapsing stars, German astrophysicist Kurt Schwarzschild deduced the critical radius for a given mass at which matter would collapse into an infinitely dense state known as a singularity. For a black hole whose mass equals 10 suns, this radius is about 30 kilometers or 19 miles, which translates into a critical circumference of 189 kilometers or 118 miles. "
"the singularity, where matter is crushed to infinite density, the pull of gravity is infinitely strong, and spacetime has infinite curvature."
Consider yourself corrected.
Regardless of what your opinion is, the comic says that it was a miniture black hole. Therefore, it was. A black hole has already collapsed upon itself. That's the definition of a black hole.
*sigh* No, Comic Cube, a black hole hasn't collapsed upon itself. A black hole is a collapsed star. A black hole is destroyed when it no longer has enough mass to sustain itself for any length of time. Get your facts straight. A mini black hole can be microscopic, but for it to last as long as it did in that issue, it would have to be hundreds or thousands of times larger than the minimum threshold of 9 billion tons.
I've since changed my position on that matter. Mindless Hulk never fought Onslaught. Savage Hulk did. In fact, at the beginning of the encounter, Hulk was Professor Hulk. Professor Hulk can't change into Savage Hulk by himself, so Jean used her power to turn him into Savage Hulk.
Now, as I recall Cosmic Cube, you specifically commented on Hulk changing versions while fighting Cable and Storm as evidence of his state change with rage. Are you retracting that?
Jean switched off Banner - that's not Savage Hulk. Banner's influence was totally turned off. That's beyond Savage Hulk, who Cable was able to transform him into during Onslaught without turning off Banner. So there's pretty clearly a difference beween the two.
Whether Jean was the source of the Savage Hulk's rage or not is debatable. Savage Hulk has shown in the past that he can reach such unstoppable states of rage by himself. He has no control over his anger whatsoever. Savage Hulk reaching that level of rage without external influence is not improbable.
What?!?! He has no control over his anger whatsoever??? are you serious? What do you make of all those instances where Savage Hulk is angry and unable to get stronger, then suddenly flips out over some friend of his (Jones, Betty, etc) getting hurt? Hulk reaching that level of rage IS improbable against Superman. Look, it's only happened in specific instances that we can count on one hand. I know you want to hype up Hulk as being Mr. Strong and everything, but you also have to be unbiased and reasonable in your assessments. I'm questioning that.
Here are a few problems with your argument:1) Superman does not, and cannot attain limitless amounts of strength. There is no infinite source of power that he can draw from.
I've given references in comics that say otherwise. As long as energy exists, he can draw from it. There is infinite energy in the comic universe, when you include all the dimensions - like the one from which Hulk draws his own "infinite" power.
2) Hulk has shown that he can become stronger than opponents far more powerful than himself, without any intervention or outside influence.
No evidence of Hulk doing that quickly without emotional trauma or outside influence. It's always - I repeat - ALWAYS taken some form of trauma for him to jump past his opponent in power. The burden of his showings strongly contradict that statement, CC.
Hulk is like Rocky. Infinite potential, yes, but he requires a montage, a loved one dying and Adrian to reach it. He doesn't get that against Superman the same way Superman doesn't get to sun dip.