Originally posted by dadudemonlol, I could never be offended by having a person think I was of a given religon that I respect. Because to me there's nothing shameful about beign part of certain religions. 🙂
You are a really nice guy and you know a lot about Mormons so I got to wondering about it. (Not that all Mormons are nice people...)
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
I have a friend who recently became a Mormon...he did it for the girl he loves I think.
I find that that happens quite a bit.
In fact, some males go on their "Mission" because they want to get married to a Mormon girl...they say that it is hard to find a girl who won't marry a "return missionary".
Originally posted by Bardock42
I'm guessing "Latino American", too etc.
You'd be wrong with that one.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Even if it isn't in Japan (which I doubt), it has sexual connotations for people from our cultural backgrounds.
What? Chicks who don't look a day over 14 wearing cat costumes? That's actually not very popular or commonplace in the US.
Japan is however obsessed with the cute fetish.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
You'd be wrong with that one.
You are telling me that girls dressed in cat dresses posing for a camera stretching out their ****....is not the least bit thought of as sexual in Latino culture.
Seriously?
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
What? Chicks who don't look a day over 14 wearing cat costumes? That's actually not very popular or commonplace in the US.Japan is however obsessed with the cute fetish.
that's contrary to what you said before. But it doesn't matter to my point, I didn't say that my culture had an obsession with that fetish, but that a picture like that would be viewed as sexual.
Originally posted by Bardock42
You are telling me that girls dressed in cat dresses posing for a camera stretching out their ****....is not the least bit thought of as sexual in Latino culture.Seriously?
A woman doing that (the stretching action), yes. But the whole thing with the cat ears, face paint, flat chest and doe-eyed look really isn't that appealing to Latinos. Just take my word Bardock, between the two of us I'm fairly certain that I'm the authority on Latino culture (Call it a hunch).
Originally posted by Bardock42
that's contrary to what you said before. But it doesn't matter to my point, I didn't say that my culture had an obsession with that fetish, but that a picture like that would be viewed as sexual.
Because of the outfit's conotation, coupled with Japanese popculture.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
A woman doing that (the stretching action), yes. But the whole thing with the cat ears, face paint, flat chest and doe-eyed look really isn't that appealing to Latinos. Just take my word Bardock, between the two of us I'm fairly certain that I'm the authority on Latino culture (Call it a hunch).
Wouldn't deny it, though it strikes me as odd. Like...nonsensical, you know? But I am sure there are lots of cultures I don't understand.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Because of the outfit's conotation, coupled with Japanese popculture.
Maybe, point I was making is that it is reasonable to be viewed as sexual. You seem to agree now.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Wouldn't deny it, though it strikes me as odd. Like...nonsensical, you know? But I am sure there are lots of cultures I don't understand.
What strikes you as odd? That we don't care for catsuits, or don't like women who lack curves?
Originally posted by Bardock42
Maybe, point I was making is that it is reasonable to be viewed as sexual. You seem to agree now.
I never denied that the picture could be taken as sexual, I just said that it wasn't as blatant as Adam's picture.
But you already summed that up:
Originally posted by Bardock42
It's a guy. It's sick. Just accept it already.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
What strikes you as odd? That we don't care for catsuits, or don't like women who lack curves?
That you wouldn't consider a picture like that sexual.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I never denied that the picture could be taken as sexual, I just said that it wasn't as blatant as Adam's picture.
That's arguable. I'd say inimalist pictures is more of a fetish, while Adam's might have had more sexual intention, it seems to me less sexual in view.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
But you already summed that up:
I was joking, of course.