Originally posted by leonidas
as for the chopper--he was braced against the car. let's assume the car DID aid him. in order to do so he would have had to have the leg strength still to maintain his braced stance against the pull of the chopper anyway as he was not fastened to the car. since he was independent of it, the chopper would have pulled him free first before pulling the car.put yourself in the car--think you or anyone you know could have done it? clearly it was a superhuman feat.
I never claimed it wasn't a superhuman feat (definitely a durability feat). I said that his strength didn't do all of the work. Who cares about anything else? For one, the force of the car had to be greater than the force the helicopter was pulling at. If not, then assuming Cap is perfectly attached to the car (glued like crazy), then helicopter would have pulled both the car and Cap with it. The skateboard analogy is a perfect one. If Cap is glued to the skateboard then him and the skateboard will be pulled unless the skateboard exerts a force on the ground equal to the force the helicopter is pulling with. Otherwise the skateboard will be pulled and start rolling toward the helicopter. Cap can't stop the skateboard from rolling because he is bracing against it but it is connected to the ground with wheels.
Hell, a small weak child can pull you with a rope on the skateboard against your will. Think about it?
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
The vehicle Captain America is on / in is completely irrelevant. One end of the grappling hook is tether to the helicpoter. The other end is tether to an object in Captain America's hand. If at any point that line goes taunt, and Captain America isn't physically strong enough to pull the helicopter against it's resistance... then Captain America gets yanked up off the ground by the helicopter. It doesn't mater if he is on a car, a boat, a skateboard, roller blades, or chilling in on the patio in a lawn chair. You'd be right if the line was fixed to the car, or Captain America was buckled in with a seat belt, but neither of those things are true.
You are not understanding. If Cap's feet are glued to a skateboard then do you think he could pull down a helicopter (assuming he had infinite strength)?
Originally posted by psycho gundam
you should be asking why cap wasn't simply pulled up by the copter. the car isn't part of his lower body
Cap wasn't pulled because he was bracing against the vertical part of the seat of the car. It prevented him from being pulled out of the car by the helicopter. If not, then why the hell you think the writer had him brace against the vertical part of the seat.
Originally posted by Blight
This is the most stupid logic I have ever read on a site. If he were on a skateboard and a helicopter were pulling him, he would be pulled off the skateboard... unless he somehow had the muscle fortitude to keep himself on (which is inhuman).
No assuming the helicopter is pulling him laterally or Cap's feet are glued to the skateboard. My point is that the skateboard will be pulled along with Cap (even if Cap had infinite strength) since the skateboard isn't providing a resistance against the helicopter and will roll.