http://new.petitiononline.com/nfl12006/petition.html
Sing this Petition.
http://new.petitiononline.com/nfl12006/petition.html
Sing this Petition.
The only two calls that Seattle got screwed was the Hasslebeck penalty and maybe the holding call.
Please STOP with saying Rothesburger didn't get in. It was impossible to tell.
And maybe if Seattle didn't screw up in the end of both halves and Stevens didn't drop balls in three crucial plays, Seattle wouldn't have lost.
The Raiders got screwed in the tuck rule in the Snow bowl a few years ago but know what. They also had a 3rd and 1 which would've WON the game if they got a first. They couldn't get a measely one yard and lost. They didn't deserve to win the the game which is true for Seattle. Seattle had their chances but blew them- the better team won.
so you mean to say Darrel Jackson commited offensive pass interference strangelove? and that mack strong didnt lose a yard or 2 on the spot of the ball? buy a TV if you think so.
and again im not saying Seattle would have won for sure, al though they likely would have because pitt played miserable most of the game, but the reffs shouldnt have a HUGE impact on MANY plays.
Originally posted by forumcrew
so you mean to say Darrel Jackson commited offensive pass interference strangelove? and that mack strong didnt lose a yard or 2 on the spot of the ball? buy a TV if you think so.and again im not saying Seattle would have won for sure, al though they likely would have because pitt played miserable most of the game, but the reffs shouldnt have a HUGE impact on MANY plays.
I'm not saying they Seattle should have won either.
But I know this:
Pitts had 2 official touchdowns
Seattle had one official TD, one taken away, and one probable (the way they were moving the ball I think they would have punched it in from the 1 yard line) taken away.
Thats a 21-14 game
Originally posted by forumcrew
so you mean to say Darrel Jackson commited offensive pass interference strangelove? and that mack strong didnt lose a yard or 2 on the spot of the ball? buy a TV if you think so.and again im not saying Seattle would have won for sure, al though they likely would have because pitt played miserable most of the game, but the reffs shouldnt have a HUGE impact on MANY plays.
Yes, and he did. If you arm goes out to create space between you and your defender, it is a penalty. That is what I saw and that is what the ref's saw. Good call.
Not sure what play you're talking about with Strong.
Don't need anymore TV's, thank you.
Wouda, shoulda, coulda. I've seen all my favorite teams (Kings, Raiders, A's) get bad calls against them in the playoffs that were way worse than this game. But know what!!! They also had many chances to win the series/game. They didn't capitalize on their opportunities lost because of it.
Seattle screwed themselves more than the ref's.
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove
Yes, and he did. If you arm goes out to create space between you and your defender, it is a penalty. That is what I saw and that is what the ref's saw. Good call.Not sure what play you're talking about with Strong.
Don't need anymore TV's, thank you.
Wouda, shoulda, coulda. I've seen all my favorite teams (Kings, Raiders, A's) get bad calls against them in the playoffs that were way worse than this game. But know what!!! They also had many chances to win the series/game. They didn't capitalize on their opportunities lost because of it.
Seattle screwed themselves more than the ref's.
Read this over, then tell me what you think:
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=20060205023
Stats wise, I'd say Seattle is the better team. Hasselback threw way better than Ben did. So the steelers had 40 yards more rushing. Woop-di-doo
Originally posted by OB1-adobe
Read this over, then tell me what you think:
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=20060205023Stats wise, I'd say Seattle is the better team. Hasselback threw way better than Ben did. So the steelers had 40 yards more rushing. Woop-di-doo
Do stats tell the story of how Seattle screwed up at the end of both halves? or how Seattle couldn't make the big play unlike Pitt? or how Seattle couldn't stop 3RD and 28?
Yards are nice and all but does it really matter when your third down effiency is at 29%?
Don't care who won the Superbowl, but IMO, the refs called a very bad game. They favored the Steelers and gave them all the calls.
Daryl Jackson TD in the 1st QT was a TD, but they said offensive pass interference because D. Jackson pushed off. Very iffy and questionable call.
Daryl Jackson caught a 2nd TD and they said he was out of bounds. Tell me anyone, if one foot is in bounds and the other brushes the pile on (orange foam stick in the end zone) isn't that a TD? I thought the pile on being touched meant TD all the time.
Ben Rothesliberger's TD looked like he was stopped on the one yard line. The ball was around his chest area when he was tackled.
Late in the 4th, Pittsburg tackled a Seattle WR with a blatant horse collar tackle. Even Al Michaels said it was a horse collar, and the refs never called it. Two plays later, Hasselbeck threw the INT.
Madden remarked about a holding call against Seattle which was very questionable. Instead of the ball on the 1 yard line, they got pushed back to like the 30 yard line.
I repeat, I don't care who won the game. I'm a Giants fan, but the refs were favoring Pittsburg this game.
Opinions???
It was bad officiating.
The biggest were the holding call, the block below the belt, the non-td (I'm sorry but thats not offensive pass inteference), and the horse tackle.
That holding call would of given Seattle the ball on the one. The block below the belt would of given the Steelers the ball near the 20 instead near the 40, that td would of change the whole outcome of the game, and if it didnt, the last drive for Seattle would of been completly different, the horse tackle, the less severe of miscalls, still would of given better field position for Seattle.
I dont know about the other Jackson td catch with cone, I am not too sure about the exact ruling about it, but I'm pretty sure if you hit the cone, its a td. But Im not totally sure.
Big Ben's TD was the correct call. I think he didnt cross the line, but theyre wasnt enough evidence to overturn. But it was funny that the line judge first called it on the 1, then changed his mind soon afterwards. What change his mind?
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=bayless/060205
article by skip bayless who pick the steelers to win and has no respect for seattle..
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs05/columns/story?columnist=smith_michael&id=2320683
Michael smith a senior writer for espn.com
if you dont trust espn, heres cbssportsline.
http://www.sportsline.com/general/story/9211623?controversial2062006
Originally posted by XxILuvVegetaxX
Super Bowl this year was so boring, there was almost no action in the 1st half. Im glad Steelers won, I won some money ^_^
😎 ✅ 👆
The Steelers won, and I won a fiddy bucks.......which is good cuz I spent about 30 at the bar last night.
football#36 Jerome "The Bus" Bettis (HB)
football#43 Troy Polamalu (SS)
football#85 Nate Washington (WR)
Originally posted by XxILuvVegetaxXI fell asleep when the rollin stones were performin, They so borin, i fell alseep. I wuz so pissed cuz i wanted to stay up to watch the boondocks
Super Bowl this year was so boring, there was almost no action in the 1st half. Im glad Steelers won, I won some money ^_^
Originally posted by JacopeX
I fell asleep when the rollin stones were performin, They so borin, i fell alseep. I wuz so pissed cuz i wanted to stay up to watch the boondocks
Seriously, homes! Why the hell were the Stones performing at the Superbowl anyways? Those British vatos probably don't know the first thing about football, much less give a shit.
Originally posted by DiamondBullets
😎 ✅ 👆The Steelers won, and I won a fiddy bucks.......which is good cuz I spent about 30 at the bar last night.
football#36 Jerome "The Bus" Bettis (HB)
football#43 Troy Polamalu (SS)
football#85 Nate Washington (WR)
is that your list of players who did nothing in the superbowl?