Originally posted by xkalybr
Don't care who won the Superbowl, but IMO, the refs called a very bad game. They favored the Steelers and gave them all the calls.Daryl Jackson TD in the 1st QT was a TD, but they said offensive pass interference because D. Jackson pushed off. Very iffy and questionable call.
Daryl Jackson caught a 2nd TD and they said he was out of bounds. Tell me anyone, if one foot is in bounds and the other brushes the pile on (orange foam stick in the end zone) isn't that a TD? I thought the pile on being touched meant TD all the time.
Ben Rothesliberger's TD looked like he was stopped on the one yard line. The ball was around his chest area when he was tackled.
Late in the 4th, Pittsburg tackled a Seattle WR with a blatant horse collar tackle. Even Al Michaels said it was a horse collar, and the refs never called it. Two plays later, Hasselbeck threw the INT.
Madden remarked about a holding call against Seattle which was very questionable. Instead of the ball on the 1 yard line, they got pushed back to like the 30 yard line.
I repeat, I don't care who won the game. I'm a Giants fan, but the refs were favoring Pittsburg this game.
Opinions???
I admit that the refs were favoring the steelers in this game but a few points I want to make is Rothlesberger DID make that touchdown.all the ball has to do is cross the plain -which it did and its a touchdown.It doesnt have to cross the blue area.The ball crossed the plain line when Ben was in the air and thats why it was called a touchdown.
I also agree with the refs that Jackson pushed off and they made the right choice calling that pass interference.It clearly showed him shoving him away from him.